DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36180.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36180.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36082.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36180.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 06:43 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36082
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-15
12:43 --- Applied. Thanks a lot, Manuel. This is a big step in
the right direction!
On 15.08.2005 14:04:16 Manuel Mall wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 06:43 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36082
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-15
12:43 --- Applied. Thanks a lot, Manuel. This is a big step in
the
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 08:20 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 15.08.2005 14:04:16 Manuel Mall wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 06:43 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36082
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-15
The URI
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36180.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36180.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36180.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I've posted a demo with XML Commons Resolver on the Wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/HowTo/XmlCommonsResolver
This demo shows what still needs to be done to support XML Commons
Resolver and other general purpose URIResolvers. Since the resolver.jar
is only 40KB, we could think about
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 09:14 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Oh, right, looks like the CCFFilter needs to be ported from the
maintenance branch to the trunk. I didn't remember that one. The
Batik codecs are actually not so much involved in this case, since
the TIFF doesn't have to be fully decoded.
I haven't looked into it in detail but what you say makes sense. If
possible I'd try to use loadOriginalData() as much as possible even if
I needed to stretch the meaning a bit. I'm sure you'll figure out the
right way.
On 15.08.2005 16:04:00 Manuel Mall wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 09:14 pm,
On 15.08.2005 14:38:41 Manuel Mall wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 08:20 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 15.08.2005 14:04:16 Manuel Mall wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 06:43 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36082
--- Additional Comments
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36082.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
15 matches
Mail list logo
