On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:38:18AM +0800, Manuel Mall wrote:
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 07:55 am, J.Pietschmann wrote:
Hi devs,
while examining the Checkstyle and JavaDoc complaints I
got a few more questions about the FOP style:
1. There is still quite a bit of hungarian notation here and
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:48:11PM +0200, J.Pietschmann wrote:
Next question: I used to have old (maintenance branch) jars
for FOP and Batik in the repository, which causes compilation
problems. Therefore it might be a good idea to include only
specific fles rather than *.jar in the classpath
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:04:08PM +0200, Luca Furini wrote:
Luca Furini wrote:
For example, if we have this LM tree
Outer BlockLM
|
+++
|||
BlockLM 1BlockLM 2BlockLM 3
|
Andreas,
You are asking a lot of questions. To most I have no answer, but I
have one reservation.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 01:41:05AM +0200, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
The other ones I encountered so far: implicit columns (from cells in
first row), column-number and number-columns-repeated.
I apologize for not responding sooner, but I've been very busy lately.
Anyways, I've finally found some time to get working on the website. I
think I got everything right, now I just need to work on some broken links.
Also, I am wondering if the svn diff will show everything (I moved some
