On 13.11.2006 11:06:51 Andrejus Chaliapinas wrote:
Jeremias,
In this case, if the XML format is fixed and cannot be changed at the
source, I don't think that XSL-FO is capable of rendering this content.
I'd check if you can't change the XML format to process in the first
place. If not,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40729.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40729.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Jeremias,
You can also
place your wish/requirement for tabs there so it can be considered for
XSL-FO 2.0. Just be prepared that they may wrinkle their noses.
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/
Thank you for pointing there. I'll try to post my feature request.
Is it? I'm
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40729.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40729.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
If nobody objects I'm going to remove the deprecated elements in the
apps package later this week.
Jeremias Maerki
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40729.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi all,
Sorry for the long post, but I think this is an important one.
I would like to have your feelings about the FOrayFont integration.
Since I started to work on that (in July 2005), things have quite
evolved and I'm starting to doubt that integrating FOrayFont really is a
good thing for
Hi Vincent and team,
I won't comment on the whole thing as IMO there's one element which
narrows down the choices a lot (but thanks for the detailed
explanations):
On 11/13/06, Vincent Hennebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...FOrayFont is mainly a one-man-show and it's not very good for Fop to
Another of my travel projects checked in: I wanted to know how easy it
is to load fonts without the XML metrics file. As you can see from the
amount of code, it was rather easy. Makes me wonder why we didn't do it
earlier. :-)
Please note that the existing functionality is still fully there. The
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Comments are welcome, of course.
I'm quite impressed. The layout improvements are very exciting.
J.Pietschmann
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Just be prepared that they may wrinkle their noses.
I'd expect them to do exactly this. How should tabs mix with, say,
centered text, or BIDI stuff? I'm not convinced it's worth the
additional complexity of the spec.
J.Pietschmann
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
If nobody objects I'm going to remove the deprecated elements in the
apps package later this week.
Umm, couldn't this wait until after the 0.93 release? Well, that's
a question, not a veto. If you think it's a good idea, go ahead.
J.Pietschmann
14 matches
Mail list logo
