On 28.11.2007 17:28:04 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Jeremias,
Thanks for your patience... but I’m still not convinced ;-)
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
For illustration I have attached an FO file that shows different
scenarios with some explanations. This renders correctly in FOP 0.94.
Hi Jeremias,
I think we’re making progress ;-)
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 28.11.2007 17:28:04 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
For illustration I have attached an FO file that shows different
scenarios with some explanations. This renders correctly in FOP 0.94.
There's really
On 29.11.2007 13:30:56 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
snip/
Studying the spec more carefully I come to the same conclusion as you,
but not the same explanation.
First, width doesn’t apply to fo:block, so what I said above (“it should
then also stick out in the margin”) is non-sense and damn me for
Jeremias-
Thanks! Sounds great on #1.
As for the font stuff...we need to be able to have per template fonts
as the application allows for dynamic addition of new ones and there are
multiple independent users. One of the problems with our current system
is having to manage fonts for multiple
Hi,
Ready for yet another one? Everyone’s welcome to join the game ;-)
If a table-row element has a forced height, must that height include
border-separation and the cells’ borders, or only the cells’ bpd?
See the attached pdf. On the left you have a table with one cell, and:
-
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42768.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41860.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42769.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Nov 29, 2007, at 19:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Errrm... Just wondering if I am the only one who finds this
incredibly funny?
snip/
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42768
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41841.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39840.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Carlos.
Carlos Sanchez:
The best person that will help you is a user of Batik that uses Maven, Lars?
see some comments inline
Cameron McCormack:
First, should I keep the groupId as batik? It seems inconsistent with
those for FOP and Commons, which are using org.apache.xmlgraphics.
On 29.11.2007 17:00:40 Patrick Jaromin wrote:
Jeremias-
Thanks! Sounds great on #1.
As for the font stuff...we need to be able to have per template fonts
as the application allows for dynamic addition of new ones and there are
multiple independent users. One of the problems with our
13 matches
Mail list logo
