done.
On 18.05.2005 00:58:46 Glen Mazza wrote:
I believe you had also commented out some Maker classes in
layoutmgr.LayoutManagerMapping for unused table LMs. Can we get rid of
those now as well?
Thanks,
Glen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jeremias2005/05/17 02:10:40
On 17.05.2005 22:54:31 Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Luca Furini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Luca,
First of all: compliments on yet another Nice Job!
I second that!
At the moment the page breaking algorithm is quite strict: it tries to
insert every
AbstractBreaker has maybe two or three methods in common with
LayoutManager. Furthermore, I see the Breaker as something else than a
layout manager. I think it would be confusing to merge the two concepts.
The duplicate methods can probably be moved up to the base class.
I admit that the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34948.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I admit that the AbstractBreaker was simply an artifact from merging in
Luca's initial code and which later evolved a bit but I began to like
the distinction between the LMs and the breakers.
OK, we'll keep that distinction then. This would have been a very
Hi Andreas
On 17.05.2005 23:24:55 Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jeremias and others interested in table-borders,
(Sorry for the --again-- long post, but...)
The following comment in the code (TCLM) got me
