A single XML file as I showed it in my first post. That's more easily
processed later when we put this information on the website.
On 19.10.2005 00:22:39 Mark Gaywood wrote:
Hi
Sorry for the delay, but I've got some clear evenings ahead.
With the text file (disabled-testcases.txt) are you
On 19.10.2005 03:45:33 Manuel Mall wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 05:44 am, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I've started to comment on the individual issues you listed and only
when I got to the examples I realized there must be something wrong.
You place the white-space-treatment after the
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 03:33 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 19.10.2005 03:45:33 Manuel Mall wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 05:44 am, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
snip/
Still, I get the impression that *-treatment
are both handled before white-space-collapse.
Yes, linefeed-treatment is definitely a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37157.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Yesterday I added a couple of comments concerning this bug; at the
moment I haven't received the bugzilla email yet, so here is a
copy-and-paste of the last message.
I added a comment after the copied text, so this message would not be
completely useless even if you received the original one!
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37116.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm comfortable now with the space resolution code. If it's ok for
everybody, I'd like to merge the space resolution branch into Trunk.
I've documented the open issues I know. All these issues have a
(disabled) test case to demonstrate the problem. The only thing that I
will probably do right now
Exactly.
On 19.10.2005 17:11:25 Luca Furini wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I'd prefer to make the area tree more detailed and the renderers
simpler.
Maybe we could use a trick to minimize the memory increase by creating
an additional word area as a child to the text area so we
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37165.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37157.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 08:15 am, Stephen Denne wrote:
I have not read the spec regarding these attributes recently, but I
was wondering whether the treatment of whitespace in the fo file
defaults to the normal whitespace treatment in xml files if no
special white-space treatment attributes are
11 matches
Mail list logo