Re: Text handling in svg files, transcoders
Hi Thomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : But this doesn't work when I run Fop with the same svg included in an fo file. Am I missing something? I take it this is an FO with inline SVG consisting of an SVG 'image' element referencing the SVG file? The svg file is referenced by an external-graphic element. With the 0.9alpha1 FOP and Batik 1.6 it turns out this won't work properly. If you bundle Batik from SVN this should work. That's it. It works with the newest versions of Batik and Fop. Thanks! Vincent
Re: Version numbers
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 11:53:41AM +0100, Christian Geisert wrote: Jeremias Maerki schrieb: Not necessarily. We've called it 0.90alpha1. I'd assume we'd have a 0.90beta or directly a 0.90 (final) first. But I guess that's open for I thought we do it like 0.91alpha2, ... 0.93 beta ... 1.0 discussion. I don't care too much about it. What do others think? Upping two different numbers at the same time is not logical. I go with Jeremias' idea, but I do not care too much either. Simon -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl
