DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38257] New: - non-SPACE white space chars are not treated as whitespace in footnote-tag
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38257. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38257 Summary: non-SPACE white space chars are not treated as whitespace in footnote-tag Product: Fop Version: 0.91 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P4 Component: pdf AssignedTo: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] If the fo:inline producing the footnote-text-mark inside a footnote-tag contains white space which is not a SPACE #x20;, it is recognizable in the pdf-output. A newline char produces a line-break, a tab char even a '#' (looks like number sign). In AWT-output, the line-break-issue still remains. V0.20.5 does not have this problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38257] - non-SPACE white space chars are not treated as whitespace in footnote-tag
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38257. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38257 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-13 10:29 --- Created an attachment (id=17410) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17410action=view) Source xsl fo-tree Several examples of mishandled white-space in footnote-tag -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38257] - non-SPACE white space chars are not treated as whitespace in footnote-tag
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38257. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38257 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #17411|pdf-Result |pdf-Result of former fo-tree description||# -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38257] - non-SPACE white space chars are not treated as whitespace in footnote-tag
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38257. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38257 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #17411|pdf-Result of former fo-tree|pdf-Result of former fo-tree description|# |#17410 -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Re: svn commit: r367395 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/XMLWhiteSpaceHandler.java
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:01 am, Manuel Mall wrote: On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:49 am, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: On Jan 12, 2006, at 01:14, Manuel Mall wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:34 am, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: snip / without your patch I cannot really replicate this. When I run through the debugger now I can see the space being given from the FO to the TextLayoutManager (look at the textarray in the TextLM constructor) therefore to me its still a refinement issue. But if your latest modifications fixes that then I would need that patch to further investigate. Try the diff in attach (modifications to XMLWhiteSpaceHandler and LineLayoutManager) Applied the diff but it didn't change my observation in the debugger. The extra space you noticed is coming from the FO. Therefore IMO the patch is not quite doing what you would like it to do. I haven't looked at your code yet. Andreas, The following change in XMLWhiteSpaceHandler (/*nonWhiteSpacePresent ||*/ nextChild != null)) seems to fix it. That is I just commented out the test for nonWhiteSpacePresent. I do not fully understand the implications of this change. I'll leave it up to you to further explore. Manuel Manuel
FOPDEV.org
Fop-devs, What have you been hiding? http://www.fopdev.org/ Peter smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38263] New: - NullPointerException at LineLayoutManager.findHyphenationPoints
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38263. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38263 Summary: NullPointerException at LineLayoutManager.findHyphenationPoints Product: Fop Version: 0.90 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: general AssignedTo: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the source for 0.90 alpha 1: org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.inline.LineLayoutManager line 1481 reads currLM.getWordChars(sbChars, firstElement.getPosition()); This causes a NullPointer exception because currLM never gets a chance to be initialised. line 1466 reads if (firstElement.getLayoutManager() != currLM) If currLM is still null, and firstElement.getLayoutManager() is also null, then currLM will not be initialised by the content of the if statement. A quick fix seems to be replacing - if (firstElement.getLayoutManager() != currLM) with + if (currLM == null || firstElement.getLayoutManager() != currLM) This has cured the problem with my test. I attach the FO file that reproduce the problem. It could be that the syntax I used is not correct, in which case I would appreciate comments on how to do it bettwe. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38263] - NullPointerException at LineLayoutManager.findHyphenationPoints
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38263. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38263 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-13 18:31 --- Created an attachment (id=17418) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17418action=view) FO sample that reproduce the NullPointer exception -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38264] - linefeed-treatment=preserve hyphenate=true : INCORRECT + Duplicates the text!!!
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38264. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38264 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-13 19:32 --- Created an attachment (id=17419) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17419action=view) an FO file that demonstrates the problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38264] - linefeed-treatment=preserve hyphenate=true : INCORRECT + Duplicates the text!!!
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38264. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38264 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-13 19:34 --- Created an attachment (id=17420) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17420action=view) the PDF output of the hyphen2.fo -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Re: svn commit: r368462
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 07:34:40AM +0800, Manuel Mall wrote: On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: spepping Date: Thu Jan 12 12:40:08 2006 New Revision: 368462 xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/expr/FromParentFunct ion.java (original) +++ xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/expr/FromParentFunct ion.java Thu Jan 12 12:40:08 2006 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* - * Copyright 1999-2004 The Apache Software Foundation. + * Copyright 1999-2006 The Apache Software Foundation. * I know this is very picky but shouldn't this be written as: Copyright 1999-2004, 2006 The Apache Software Foundation. Unless there was a change to the file in 2005 (see http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html)? I thought of it when I made the change, but I did not know of any pertinent rule. At the page you link to, I suppose you aim at this phrase: Source files contributed to or developed as part of an ASF project should begin with a copyright notice like Copyright 2004 The Apache Software Foundation. or Copyright 1999-2004 The Apache Software Foundation. or Copyright 2002,2004 The Apache Software Foundation. where the years given start with the first publication year of the file contents (the authored expression) and include a range of years for each year that new significant content (derivative work) is published within the file. Since the ASF publishes its code in public source code modules (CVS and Subversion), we generally want to include a range of years starting with the year of origin. It is quite equivocal for me. On the one hand it speaks about new significant content, which would mean: leave out 2005. On the other it speaks about a range of years due to the public accessibility (meaning continuous publication?), which would mean: 1999-2006. Simon -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38257] - non-SPACE white space chars are not treated as whitespace in footnote-tag
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38257. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38257 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-13 21:11 --- The reported result is indeed produced by the latest unstable release, version 0.91beta. The output is OK with the latest code from the Subversion repository (currently at revision 367760). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 635] - Doesn't support id= attribute in fo:page-sequence
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=635. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=635 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|__UNKNOWN__ |fop- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|REOPENED|NEW -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38263] - NullPointerException at LineLayoutManager.findHyphenationPoints
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38263. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38263 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-13 21:16 --- The NPE is indeed thrown in version 0.90alpha1. The problem is no longer present in the latest release, version 0.91beta. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38264] - linefeed-treatment=preserve hyphenate=true : INCORRECT + Duplicates the text!!!
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38264. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38264 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-13 21:21 --- This problem is also present in subversion HEAD, rev. 367760 -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Re: FOPDEV.org
On Jan 13, 2006, at 14:09, Peter B. West wrote: Fop-devs, What have you been hiding? OK, I give up. I'm actually forty years older than I look... :-) Cheers, Andreas
Re: svn commit: r367395 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/XMLWhiteSpaceHandler.java
On Jan 13, 2006, at 15:47, Manuel Mall wrote: Applied the diff but it didn't change my observation in the debugger. The extra space you noticed is coming from the FO. Therefore IMO the patch is not quite doing what you would like it to do. I haven't looked at your code yet. Andreas, The following change in XMLWhiteSpaceHandler (/*nonWhiteSpacePresent ||*/ nextChild != null)) seems to fix it. OK. I'll have a closer look at it this weekend Cheers, Andreas
