Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41019] - Left-align oddness with long, unbreakable strings following

2006-12-06 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi Luca, Luca Furini a écrit : snip/ 1) TextLM breaks the text even when a / or a - is found, handling them as hyphenation points with the usual sequence of glue + penalty + glue elements. The LineLM tries, in the first instance, to avoid using hyphenation points, so the penalty is not

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41019] - Left-align oddness with long, unbreakable strings following

2006-12-06 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi guys, J.Pietschmann a écrit : Simon Pepping wrote: Would this be a good moment to make these features of the breaking algorithm user configurable, like they are in TeX? This allows people to play with the various possibilities without having to modify the code. This can be combined with

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41019] - Left-align oddness with long, unbreakable strings following

2006-12-06 Thread Simon Pepping
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 12:19:01PM +0100, Luca Furini wrote: Simon Pepping wrote: Would this be a good moment to make these features of the breaking algorithm user configurable, like they are in TeX? This allows people to play with the various possibilities without having to modify the

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41019] - Left-align oddness with long, unbreakable strings following

2006-12-06 Thread Simon Pepping
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 03:46:54PM +0100, Vincent Hennebert wrote: Luca Furini a écrit : Vincent wrote: I don't follow you: IIUC the glue-penalty-glue triplet is generated only the second time, when the first breaking doesn't give acceptable results? What do you mean by the penalty is

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41019] - Left-align oddness with long, unbreakable strings following

2006-12-06 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Dec 6, 2006, at 20:39, Simon Pepping wrote: Hi folks, On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 12:19:01PM +0100, Luca Furini wrote: snip / I agree with you that it would be good to have them configurable. Your idea is to put them in the configuration file or in the fo file itself? At the moment, my

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41044] - [PATCH] FOP memory usage patches.

2006-12-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41044. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41044] - [PATCH] FOP memory usage patches.

2006-12-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41044. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41044] - [PATCH] FOP memory usage patches.

2006-12-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41044. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.