Re: Increase in activity?
Chris Bowditch a écrit : Jeremias Maerki wrote: Do I have a slightly distorted perception or do we currently see an increase in activity, even patches, following the 0.93 release? Hi Jeremias, yes I think there has been a increase in both user and development activity in the few weeks since the New Year. Maybe as a result of the recent stable release. Also, the adoption of Fop 0.93 seems to be rather quick in the DocBook community. I've already seen many messages about it on the docbook-apps@ list. That's all good news! Vincent
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41448] - java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.inline.WrapperLayoutManager
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41448. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41448 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-25 00:29 --- Created an attachment (id=19453) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19453action=view) broken.xml reproduces this error, works.xml works. Includes .fo files Used xsltproc: B:\xsltproc --version Using libxml 20619CVS2407, libxslt 10114CVS1012 and libexslt 812CVS1012 xsltproc was compiled against libxml 20619, libxslt 10114 and libexslt 812 libxslt 10114 was compiled against libxml 20619 libexslt 812 was compiled against libxml 20619 DocBook XSL Stylesheets 1.71.1 fop-0.93 -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41448] - java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.inline.WrapperLayoutManager
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41448. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41448 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-25 01:50 --- The FO generated by docbook contains fo:wrapper elements as direct children of fo:flow, e.g. fo:wrapper id=id91268 !--index term-- /fo:wrapper In 0.93 this is the cause of the ClassCastException. The ClassCastException has been fixed in SVN. But the id attribute has no affect on an fo:wrapper in FOP currently. I guess docbook generates this as a placeholder for PDF destinations. If you don't care about PDF destinations and just want to overcome the ClassCastException then get an SVN client, download the code and compile it yourself. If you don't fancy doing that then you may want to tell the docbook folks about this problem. Maybe when fop1.extensions is set they could skip generating such fo:wrapper elements for PDF Destinations, since PDF Destinations aren't supported in FOP anyway. I'm closing this bug as the ClassCastException is fixed. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41460] New: - Forced Line break breaks word wrap
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41460. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41460 Summary: Forced Line break breaks word wrap Product: Fop Version: 0.93 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: page-master/layout AssignedTo: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] When generating a simple PDF which includes a word which is wider that the width of the document, the word-wrapping of the rest of the document is wrong. It seems to half the horizontal space used. Example fo: ?xml version=1.0? fo:root xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format; fo:layout-master-set fo:simple-page-master master-name=my-page page-width=100mm page-height=70mm fo:region-body margin-top=2px margin-bottom=2px column-count=1 / /fo:simple-page-master /fo:layout-master-set fo:page-sequence master-reference=my-page fo:flow flow-name=xsl-region-body fo:block color=black fo:block This next little bit will test out us font sizes, which we need to be able to change and play with. Another interesting little test is this following URL, which is too wide to fit on to a single line of htis PDF. Question is, will FOP split is in a sensible way. https://some.imaginary.long.url.com/chaptereight/love_experience/ecommerce/admin?showinfo That'd be a yes then! /fo:block /fo:block /fo:flow /fo:page-sequence /fo:root -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41460] - Forced Line break breaks word wrap
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41460. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41460 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-25 04:08 --- This problem seems to be cropping up a lot *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41019 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41019] - Left-align oddness with long, unbreakable strings following
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41019. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41019 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-25 04:08 --- *** Bug 41460 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41019] - Left-align oddness with long, unbreakable strings following
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41019. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41019 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-25 04:53 --- Enabling hyphenation also seems to prevent the problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41019] - Left-align oddness with long, unbreakable strings following
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41019. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41019 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-25 06:35 --- I have created a patch fixing the BreakingAlgorithm, so that, when a restart is needed, the algorithm starts from a previously deactivated node (if it exists) instead of using either a short break or a long one (there are a few messages in fop-dev concerning this). This should solve the bug, but makes the testcase block_uax14_linebreaking.xml fail; in particular, the block testing exclamation and question marks creates a different set of breaks that looks quite worse than the expected one, while still being correct. I already have a couple of suspects: - the LineLM can call findBreakingPoints() with a threshold equal to 20: this allows a huge overstretch, especially with unjustified text when the glue elements have some conventional (and quite high) stretch value - the element sequences created by the TextLM have some unintentional feasible breaks that could be actually chosen while the algorithm is ignoring the hyphenation points For the moment I'm attaching the partial patch, as I'm reluctant to apply it before fixing the other details; I should have some time to finish it tomorrow afternoon, but if someone else is quicker :-) Luca -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41019] - Left-align oddness with long, unbreakable strings following
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41019. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41019 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-25 06:36 --- Created an attachment (id=19459) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19459action=view) Partial fix, patching the BreakingAlgorithm -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41019] - Left-align oddness with long, unbreakable strings following
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41019. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41019 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |tech.com| -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Re: Adding Named Destinations for all IDs
I seem to remember doubts being raised as to whether it should be made standard or handled by resurrecting the fox:destination extension. Adding named destinations for each and every id in the document may not always be desirable, so it may be better to leave this choice up to the end-user. Right, we were talking about an extension attribute to enable a named destination as replacement for fox:destination. OK. I'll look at doing it as an extension, with the form of fox:destination internal-destination=something. Thanks. Jay Bryant Bryant Communication Services
