DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42049] - RTF (and PDF) tables incorrectly handle margin-left inheritance

2007-09-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42049.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42049





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-05 07:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=20776)
 -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20776action=view)
Indent inheritance test - PDF generated by fop 0.94


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42049] - RTF (and PDF) tables incorrectly handle margin-left inheritance

2007-09-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42049.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42049





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-05 07:36 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
 V Schappert;
 
 FOP does not have a bug wrt Indent inheritence. FOP implements indent 
 inheritence according to the XSL-FO specification. Other implementations are 
 not compliant. Although perhaps they are more along the lines of what Users 
 would expect. See the following Wiki for a detailed explanation of indent 
 inheritence:
 
 http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/IndentInheritance

It's not clear what version of fop (any of you) are referring to. I tried to
generate the examples
(http://people.apache.org/~jeremias/fop/indent-inheritance2.fo) found on the
Wiki mentioned above and got different results for the versions I tried. The
versions I tried were 0.20.5 and 0.94.

I'm not sure which one is correct, but I assume fop 0.20.5 got it right (0.94
seems to give nested blocks where start-indent has been reset a negative indent
relative its containing block - or did I miss something :-).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43307] - Misleading Error Message w/ XML+XSL input

2007-09-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43307.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43307


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-05 13:10 ---
Did some further testing, and I am now definitely going to close this one.

When using other versions of Xalan, the problem does not occur. We cannot do 
anything about this at the 
FOP side.
Try replacing your XSLT processor to avoid the problem, or check with xalan-dev 
if it is a known bug and 
whether a patch is available.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


Fonts page?

2007-09-05 Thread Andreas L Delmelle


Hi all,

Is there a slight error on our fonts page?

see: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.94/fonts.html#register

What is the function/meaning of the first four bullets?

Have I missed something? Anyone know where these come from?


Cheers

Andreas