DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42748] - FOP 0.93 is not resolving empty fo:inline index markers

2007-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Creating New org.apache.fop.fo.flow.table Package

2007-11-02 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Nov 2, 2007, at 12:08, Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi Guys, this proposal will be based on lazy consensus. I think that table-related FObj descendants are numerous enough to deserve their own package. Moreover, creating a new sub-package will allow for more fine-grained access control of

Creating New org.apache.fop.fo.flow.table Package

2007-11-02 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi Guys, this proposal will be based on lazy consensus. I think that table-related FObj descendants are numerous enough to deserve their own package. Moreover, creating a new sub-package will allow for more fine-grained access control of methods. And the flow package is already quite big. If

Re: Creating New org.apache.fop.fo.flow.table Package

2007-11-02 Thread Adrian Cumiskey
Hi Vincent, You certainly have more knowledge in this area than I, so I'm quite happy to go along with your suggestion :). Adrian. Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi Guys, this proposal will be based on lazy consensus. I think that table-related FObj descendants are numerous enough to deserve

Re: AFP GOCA

2007-11-02 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Adrian, look here: http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/AFPResources I'm using the Internet Explorer plug-in and it hasn't let me down, yet. I'm looking forward to seeing how well the Graphics2D interface can be mapped to AFP. Jeremias Maerki On 02.11.2007 17:43:07 Adrian Cumiskey wrote:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42748] - FOP 0.93 is not resolving empty fo:inline index markers

2007-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42423] - id attribute on fo:wrapper ignored (if fo:wrapper is a direct descendant of the fo:flow)

2007-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42423. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42029] - Wrong title on the FOP 0.93 Release Notes page

2007-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42029. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35749] - fo wrapper/basic-link combination doesn't work

2007-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35749. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.