Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44412] Missing border-after when break-after set on a block

On May 15, 2008, at 12:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Comment #25 from Vincent Hennebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED] tech.com> 2008-05-15 03:53:03 PST --- (In reply to comment #18) page, along with the inner block, in attachment #21531 [details]. I think our best bet is to ask for clarification on [

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44412] Missing border-after when break-after set on a block

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44412 --- Comment #25 from Vincent Hennebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-15 03:53:03 PST --- (In reply to comment #18) > page, along with the inner block, in attachment #21531 [details]. I think our > best bet is > to ask for clarification

Breaks and Borders, Successive Break Contexts

Dear XSL-FO Editors, The following situations are not explicitly described by the XSL-FO 1.1 Recommendation and no consistent behaviour could be found among the various implementations: Given the following FO snippet: Some text. If the outer block is not leading

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40557] PDF encryption and Acrobat 5

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40557 Andreas L. Delmelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED