Re: FOPIDESetupGuide updated to Netbeans 6.5
Andreas Delmelle wrote: On 21 Jan 2009, at 11:45, Peter B. West wrote: It might be a good idea to set svn:ignore properties on ant.jar and the offo jars in lib. Then you could tell interested parties to drop those jars into lib as part of the preparation for building, and it's unlikely that the jars will come back t haunt you. Yep, dropping the ant.jar in $FOP_HOME$/lib would probably be the fastest solution. It's what I wanted to suggest first, but then again, I'm personally not too fond of copying JARs around. If you have Ant somewhere on your machine, then IMO, it's cleaner to have the build-classpath point to that ant.jar than copying it to the lib folder. Just remembered: we have svn:ignore set on the file $FOP_HOME/build-local.properties, which one could create and use to specify locations of dependencies that are dependent on the local setup. If you're running *n*x, you can link ant.jar into lib. I believe you can even do that with ntfs nowadays. It's simpler to have all your build requirements in one place. -- Peter B. West http://cv.pbw.id.au/ Folio http://defoe.sourceforge.net/folio/folio.html
Re: FOPIDESetupGuide updated to Netbeans 6.5
I was interested to read the procedure outlined, but I think there is a slightly easier way, using what NetBeans calls Free-Form Projects. When I get a bit of time, I'll put some detail son the wiki. -- Peter B. West http://cv.pbw.id.au/ Folio http://defoe.sourceforge.net/folio/folio.html
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46567] FOP throws a validation exception when an fo:table-row contains a marker as its first child
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46567 Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #4 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-01-22 14:01:50 PST --- Fix committed. See: r736813 ( https://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?view=revrev=736813 ) Note: although FObj.addMarker() also checks for possible preceding nodes, followed the same approach as the other table objects. Makes sense to bail out early here. Added the testcase to the FO tree tests for the moment. Haven't checked whether the marker is processed, yet. Last I recall, this was not yet implemented, and the markers are ignored during layout. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
