https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
--- Comment #35 from Julien Aymé julien.a...@gmail.com ---
I will attach both a test case and a patch, later this afternoon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
--- Comment #36 from Julien Aymé julien.a...@gmail.com ---
The bug is trivial:
if (source = 10e-3 source 1e7) { is wrong !
if (source = 1e-3 source 1e7) { is right.
My mistake when reading 10 exp -3 in Double.toString javadoc and
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43962
--- Comment #4 from Julien Aymé julien.a...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 28849
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28849action=edit
patch for both class and test case (DoubleFormatUtil.java and
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43962
--- Comment #5 from Julien Aymé julien.a...@gmail.com ---
Patch attached to wrong issue. Please ignore.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
--- Comment #37 from Julien Aymé julien.a...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 28850
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28850action=edit
patch for both class and test case (DoubleFormatUtil.java and
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
--- Comment #38 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org ---
(In reply to comment #36)
The bug is trivial:
if (source = 10e-3 source 1e7) { is wrong !
if (source = 1e-3 source 1e7) { is right.
My mistake when reading 10 exp -3 in
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43962
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28849|0 |1
is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
--- Comment #39 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org ---
(In reply to comment #38)
(In reply to comment #36)
The bug is trivial:
if (source = 10e-3 source 1e7) { is wrong !
if (source = 1e-3 source 1e7) { is right.
My mistake
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
--- Comment #40 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org ---
(In reply to comment #39)
(In reply to comment #38)
(In reply to comment #36)
The bug is trivial:
if (source = 10e-3 source 1e7) { is wrong !
if (source = 1e-3 source
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
--- Comment #41 from Julien Aymé julien.a...@gmail.com ---
My understanding of Double.toString javadoc is that the contract described in
the javadoc is mandatory for every implementation of the JVM.
But since I may be wrong, feel free to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
--- Comment #42 from Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #41)
My understanding of Double.toString javadoc is that the contract described
in the javadoc is mandatory for every implementation of the JVM.
I agree
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50852
Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53316
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 53316
Assignee: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Summary: Obscure algorithm of lines break in output PDF
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53316
Pascal Sancho pascal.san...@takoma.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53316
--- Comment #2 from Nawa navat...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 28854
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28854action=edit
new samples
input1.fo contains simplified input with
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53316
Nawa navat...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
Julien Aymé julien.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28850|0 |1
is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53316
--- Comment #3 from Manuel Mall man...@apache.org ---
What you are observing is most likely the effect of the FOP linebreaking
algorithm that is based on so called Knuth model
(http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/KnuthsModel). In a very
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53316
--- Comment #4 from Nawa navat...@gmail.com ---
Thank Manuel
Seems to be true. Is it possible to change linebreaking behavior from Knuth
model to simple in my XSL-FO?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53316
--- Comment #5 from Manuel Mall man...@apache.org ---
AFAIK you cannot switch off the Knuth algorithm or fallback to a simpler
algorithm. Looking at your output1.pdf it would be interesting to figure out
what a first fit algorithm would
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53316
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
Bug 51150 depends on bug 43940, which changed state.
Bug 43940 Summary: [PATCH] Faster method for double formatting
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
What|Removed |Added
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
You are
24 matches
Mail list logo
