[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13559323#comment-13559323
]
Glenn Adams commented on FOP-2190:
--
i've implemented a portion of this patch already in FOP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Glenn Adams resolved FOP-2196.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/xmlgraphics/?p=127
Glenn Adams created FOP-2196:
Summary: remove release candidate binaries and source artifacts
from svnpubsub repository
Key: FOP-2196
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2196
Project: Fop
One more point, which is "probably inlined" is not a very good guarantee,
since that is strictly an implementation option. Better to error on the
side of assuming it won't inline, and at least optimize the hot spots that
would be affect if inlining doesn't occur.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:12 PM,
I agree that when JIT inlines this it will not have much affect. However,
when profiling, this was identified as a hot spot.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi Glenn,
>
> does that significantly improve performance? I would be really surprised
> if it would, given tha
Hi Glenn,
does that significantly improve performance? I would be really surprised
if it would, given that the method call is probably inlined by the JIT
compiler anyway. Do you have figures to share?
Thanks,
Vincent
On 18/01/13 22:13, gadams wrote:
> Author: gadams
> Date: Fri Jan 18 21:13:42
thanks, i will remove from the release dir; the archives automatically copy
everything that went into the release dirs, and can't be removed, so that
is why 1.1 already appears there
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi Glenn,
>
> I think they can definitely be removed f
Hi Glenn,
I think they can definitely be removed from the mirrors (the source as
well for that matter).
But I think that, rather than removing them altogether, they should be
moved to the archives:
http://archive.apache.org/dist/xmlgraphics/fop/binaries/
where actually they already appear. Not to
Hi Glenn,
I don't have a strong preference either way, but I think it probably
makes sense to encourage people to use the actual released version by
removing it.
Thanks,
Chris
On 20/01/2013 21:41, Glenn Adams wrote:
What is the practice regarding retention of RC binaries? Should we
remove
