[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2733) [PATCH] Drop dependency on Avalon-Framework

2018-11-30 Thread Vikram Sherigar (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16705001#comment-16705001
 ] 

Vikram Sherigar commented on FOP-2733:
--

Any plans of Apache FOP v3.0 yet? Or resolution to this issue in a minor 
release maybe?

> [PATCH] Drop dependency on Avalon-Framework
> ---
>
> Key: FOP-2733
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2733
> Project: FOP
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Chris West
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: fop-no-avalon-1.patch
>
>
> FOP depends on avalon-framework, an old Apache project officially abandoned 
> in 2004. Nearly nobody uses avalon-framework anymore, and I'd like to see it 
> laid to rest.
> avalon-framework no-longer compiles with Java 9. Fixing it yet again seems 
> like insanity. This isn't a problem for Maven users, who can keep using the 
> old binary (and suffer slow verification on startup), but is a problem for 
> distros like Debian, who want to be able to build everything.
> Others have asked about this before, e.g. 
> http://apache-fop.1065347.n5.nabble.com/FOP-and-Avalon-td44302.html
> I propose removing the dependency on Avalon entirely, fixing the couple of 
> cases where it breaks, and inlining the two packages that are actually still 
> used.. I have created a patch here: 
> https://github.com/apache/fop/compare/trunk...FauxFaux:trunk , also attached.
> It's not great to read in patch form, so here's a summary of the changes:
>  * Remove dependence on avalon-framework from Maven, classpath variables etc.
>  * Add Avalon's configuration package as main:org.apache.fop.configuration 
> directly, and keep using it essentially unmodified.
>  * Add Avalon's logging framework as test:org.apache.fop.threading.logger. 
> This is only used in test code, in the threaded test code runner. It is 
> essentially source compatible with log4j/commons-logging, so could probably 
> be deleted.
>  * Change `CIDFontType` from a Avalon enum to a Java5 `enum`. This appears to 
> be source, but not binary, compatible.
>  * Remove some use of lifecycle management interfaces in test code, which are 
> not doing anything.
>  * Change some exception printing in test code to print the full exception 
> (using the Java api), instead of a truncated exception. The output is not 
> asserted upon, just sent to stderr.
>  * Stop using Cascading*Exception in tests, and for ConfigurationException. I 
> doubt anyone will notice, as it offers no real functionality.
> That's it!
> The most controversial thing here is probably adding the configuration 
> package, and the extra lines of code it drags along with it. I am happy to 
> give it a bit of a polish; make significant changes to fop to remove all the 
> unused interfaces / abstract classes (which are just waste); put some 
> generics and formatting in, etc.?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2830) Compatibility with Oracle Java 11

2018-11-30 Thread Vikram Sherigar (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16704992#comment-16704992
 ] 

Vikram Sherigar commented on FOP-2830:
--

Ok Simon, good to know that!

I'll close this particular for now. In case I face any issue in performing 
further checks, will log a fresh issue.

Thanks for your attention!

> Compatibility with Oracle Java 11
> -
>
> Key: FOP-2830
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2830
> Project: FOP
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Vikram Sherigar
>Priority: Major
>
> Is compatibility with Java 11 (or Java 9) planned for a future release? If 
> not, pls plan accordingly as all the earlier versions of Java have already 
> become obsolete.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Closed] (FOP-2830) Compatibility with Oracle Java 11

2018-11-30 Thread Vikram Sherigar (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Vikram Sherigar closed FOP-2830.

Resolution: Not A Bug

> Compatibility with Oracle Java 11
> -
>
> Key: FOP-2830
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2830
> Project: FOP
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Vikram Sherigar
>Priority: Major
>
> Is compatibility with Java 11 (or Java 9) planned for a future release? If 
> not, pls plan accordingly as all the earlier versions of Java have already 
> become obsolete.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2830) Compatibility with Oracle Java 11

2018-11-30 Thread simon steiner (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16704795#comment-16704795
 ] 

simon steiner commented on FOP-2830:


We would try to resolve any issues reported, there was FOP-2802

> Compatibility with Oracle Java 11
> -
>
> Key: FOP-2830
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2830
> Project: FOP
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Vikram Sherigar
>Priority: Major
>
> Is compatibility with Java 11 (or Java 9) planned for a future release? If 
> not, pls plan accordingly as all the earlier versions of Java have already 
> become obsolete.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2830) Compatibility with Oracle Java 11

2018-11-30 Thread Vikram Sherigar (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16704787#comment-16704787
 ] 

Vikram Sherigar commented on FOP-2830:
--

Thanks for your quick response!

At a preliminary level there doesn't seem to be any issue. Detailed tests are 
yet to be performed.
Just wish to know whether it is officially supported or not.

> Compatibility with Oracle Java 11
> -
>
> Key: FOP-2830
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2830
> Project: FOP
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Vikram Sherigar
>Priority: Major
>
> Is compatibility with Java 11 (or Java 9) planned for a future release? If 
> not, pls plan accordingly as all the earlier versions of Java have already 
> become obsolete.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2830) Compatibility with Oracle Java 11

2018-11-30 Thread simon steiner (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16704778#comment-16704778
 ] 

simon steiner commented on FOP-2830:


It should work, what issues do you have

> Compatibility with Oracle Java 11
> -
>
> Key: FOP-2830
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2830
> Project: FOP
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Vikram Sherigar
>Priority: Major
>
> Is compatibility with Java 11 (or Java 9) planned for a future release? If 
> not, pls plan accordingly as all the earlier versions of Java have already 
> become obsolete.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Created] (FOP-2830) Compatibility with Oracle Java 11

2018-11-30 Thread Vikram Sherigar (JIRA)
Vikram Sherigar created FOP-2830:


 Summary: Compatibility with Oracle Java 11
 Key: FOP-2830
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2830
 Project: FOP
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Vikram Sherigar


Is compatibility with Java 11 (or Java 9) planned for a future release? If not, 
pls plan accordingly as all the earlier versions of Java have already become 
obsolete.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)