DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46823] LayoutException when rendering ./examples/fo/basic/blockcontainer.fo

2012-04-17 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823 taffy-tyler6...@hotmail.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||taffy-tyler6...@hotm

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46823] LayoutException when rendering ./examples/fo/basic/blockcontainer.fo

2012-04-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823 Glenn Adams changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 -- Configure bugmail: https://is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46823] LayoutException when rendering ./examples/fo/basic/blockcontainer.fo

2012-04-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823 --- Comment #9 from Glenn Adams 2012-04-07 01:42:03 UTC --- resetting P2 open bugs to P3 pending further review -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46823] LayoutException when rendering ./examples/fo/basic/blockcontainer.fo

2009-03-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823 --- Comment #8 from Jeremias Maerki 2009-03-24 10:24:51 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) > Created an attachment (id=23407) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23407) [details] > Proposed patch > > Would the at

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46823] LayoutException when rendering ./examples/fo/basic/blockcontainer.fo

2009-03-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823 --- Comment #7 from Simon Pepping 2009-03-24 05:42:14 PST --- Created an attachment (id=23407) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23407) Proposed patch Would the attach patch solve the problem in a good way?

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46823] LayoutException when rendering ./examples/fo/basic/blockcontainer.fo

2009-03-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823 --- Comment #6 from Jeremias Maerki 2009-03-24 04:11:44 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) > The spec says: error-if-overflow: This value implies the same semantics as the > value "hidden" with the additional semantic that an error shal

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46823] LayoutException when rendering ./examples/fo/basic/blockcontainer.fo

2009-03-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823 --- Comment #5 from Simon Pepping 2009-03-24 03:26:54 PST --- The spec says: error-if-overflow: This value implies the same semantics as the value "hidden" with the additional semantic that an error shall be indicated; implementations

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46823] LayoutException when rendering ./examples/fo/basic/blockcontainer.fo

2009-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823 --- Comment #4 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-03-09 14:05:29 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > I should have looked at the FO more closely... still, this is not a very good > example for someone wanting to try FOP out. It would be b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46823] LayoutException when rendering ./examples/fo/basic/blockcontainer.fo

2009-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823 --- Comment #3 from Adrian Cumiskey 2009-03-09 13:58:31 PST --- I should have looked at the FO more closely... still, this is not a very good example for someone wanting to try FOP out. It would be better to remove the error on over

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46823] LayoutException when rendering ./examples/fo/basic/blockcontainer.fo

2009-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823 --- Comment #2 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-03-09 10:53:45 PST --- Sorry, a bit too quick, but there is a logical explanation: I had commented out the last fo:block-container, which has a overflow='error-if-overflow', so the fact th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46823] LayoutException when rendering ./examples/fo/basic/blockcontainer.fo

2009-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823 --- Comment #1 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-03-09 10:50:04 PST --- FWIW: in spite of the fact that this bug is marked as applicable to 'ALL' versions, I cannot reproduce the issue with FOP Trunk on Mac OS X (tried rendering to PDF o