Re: [VOTE] Finalized API - Merge Temp_API_Finalization branch back into Trunk

2006-03-26 Thread J.Pietschmann
Jeremias Maerki wrote: 1. I'd like to propose merging back the Temp_API_Finalization branch back into Trunk. +1 2. ... +1 from me for deprecating all Fop constructors, +1 J.Pietschmann

Re: [VOTE] Finalized API - Merge Temp_API_Finalization branch back into Trunk

2006-03-23 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Mar 21, 2006, at 15:23, Jeremias Maerki wrote: 1. I'd like to propose merging back the Temp_API_Finalization branch back into Trunk. +1 snip / 2. This is somewhat detached from point 1 above, so I put it in a second item. Jess Holle asked in [2][3] to leave the existing Fop

Re: [VOTE] Finalized API - Merge Temp_API_Finalization branch back into Trunk

2006-03-21 Thread Chris Bowditch
Jeremias Maerki wrote: We need to finish the API discussion once and for all, especially since we need to get another release out of the door soon. I'm happy with the API as described in [1] and implemented in the Temp_API_Finalization branch, except for one item handled separately below.

[VOTE] Finalized API - Merge Temp_API_Finalization branch back into Trunk

2006-03-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
We need to finish the API discussion once and for all, especially since we need to get another release out of the door soon. I'm happy with the API as described in [1] and implemented in the Temp_API_Finalization branch, except for one item handled separately below. Thanks to Simon for cleaning up

Re: [VOTE] Finalized API - Merge Temp_API_Finalization branch back into Trunk

2006-03-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 21.03.2006 16:01:40 Chris Bowditch wrote: snip/ Removing the reflection code from Jess' example, it looks like this: Fop fop = new Fop(application/pdf); fop.setOutputStream(out); DefaultHandler defaultHandler = fop.getDefaultHandler(); With the revised API, this

Re: [VOTE] Finalized API - Merge Temp_API_Finalization branch back into Trunk

2006-03-21 Thread Chris Bowditch
Jeremias Maerki wrote: On 21.03.2006 16:01:40 Chris Bowditch wrote: snip/ Whats the proposed replacement for setOutputStream() before I decide on my vote here? (The Wiki shows examples with it in) Whoops, the example wasn't updated. Just done that:

Re: [VOTE] Finalized API - Merge Temp_API_Finalization branch back into Trunk

2006-03-21 Thread Clay Leeds
These changes look like a move in the right direction... Glad to hear we're nearing another release again! On Mar 21, 2006, at 6:23 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: We need to finish the API discussion once and for all, especially since we need to get another release out of the door soon. I'm

Re: [VOTE] Finalized API - Merge Temp_API_Finalization branch back into Trunk

2006-03-21 Thread Simon Pepping
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 03:23:26PM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote: We need to finish the API discussion once and for all, especially since we need to get another release out of the door soon. I'm happy with the API as described in [1] and implemented in the Temp_API_Finalization branch, except