DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47380] Alignment handling text-align-last="justify"

2012-04-07 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380 --- Comment #5 from Glenn Adams 2012-04-07 07:46:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > One block, an inline left, an inline right, a leader in between. I'd expect > the > right inline to end at the right page end. Saying "inline left" an

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47380] Alignment handling text-align-last="justify"

2012-04-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380 Glenn Adams changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 -- Configure bugmail: https://is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47380] Alignment handling text-align-last="justify"

2012-04-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380 --- Comment #4 from Glenn Adams 2012-04-07 01:43:40 UTC --- resetting P2 open bugs to P3 pending further review -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47380] Alignment handling text-align-last="justify"

2009-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380 --- Comment #3 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-06-17 05:42:49 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > Also found the revision that (most likely) introduced this: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=749012&view=rev > > A zero-width rule-thic

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47380] Alignment handling text-align-last="justify"

2009-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380 --- Comment #1 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-06-17 04:31:25 PST --- No precise idea on the exact cause, but I already played with the testcase a bit, and it seems that changing rule-thickness to 0.1pt suffices to achieve the desired

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47380] Alignment handling text-align-last="justify"

2009-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380 --- Comment #1 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-06-17 04:31:25 PST --- No precise idea on the exact cause, but I already played with the testcase a bit, and it seems that changing rule-thickness to 0.1pt suffices to achieve the desired