Re: svn commit: r377403 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_API_Finalization: src/java/org/apache/fop/apps/ src/java/org/apache/fop/area/ src/java/org/apache/fop/cli/ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/ test/

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Most of the API finalization proposal is implemented now. No deprecations, yet, and the image cache and a couple of nits are not addressed, yet. I know this is slightly late, but shouldn't the PreviewPanel interfaces for embedding the viewer be counted as part of

Re: svn commit: r377403 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_API_Finalization: src/java/org/apache/fop/apps/ src/java/org/apache/fop/area/ src/java/org/apache/fop/cli/ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/ test/

IMO, no. At least it's not part of the core API. The PreviewPanel is some sort of an add-on component to FOP which it can theoretically live without. Someone could maintain that outside the project. Why do you ask? On 28.02.2006 13:49:07 richardw wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Most of the

Re: svn commit: r377403 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_API_Finalization: src/java/org/apache/fop/apps/ src/java/org/apache/fop/area/ src/java/org/apache/fop/cli/ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/ test/

Jeremias Maerki writes: IMO, no. At least it's not part of the core API. The PreviewPanel is some sort of an add-on component to FOP which it can theoretically live without. Someone could maintain that outside the project. Why do you ask? Just for completeness, Richard