On Apr 21, 2008, at 12:22, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
My reaction was not so much triggered by this (indeed) minor issue, as
by the fact that once again I was being answered “feel free to
improve”
when asking for cleanup/documentation, and I got tired of it. Each
time,
they were small issues
Jeremias,
For what it's worth, I think you have done an extraordinary job with
FOP. From my outside perspective, you have been the primary driver of
the progress of the product since you came to the forefront of development.
There's an inherent problem of clashing egos in OS development. I
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Simon Pepping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Easy please. Vincent has a preference. Jeremias is OK with it, but he
is not hot about it, so he is not going to do it. Vincent did not add
the new utilities, so he is not going to do it. That leaves Andreas to
do it,
On Apr 18, 2008, at 21:52, Simon Pepping wrote:
Easy please. Vincent has a preference. Jeremias is OK with it, but he
is not hot about it, so he is not going to do it. Vincent did not add
the new utilities, so he is not going to do it. That leaves Andreas to
do it, or me, or ..., or it remains
Simon, Peter, Clay, Andreas, Chris,
thank you very much for your valuable feedback! It's reassuring to know
that I'm not totally off course.
Vincent, please keep the bug reports and other suggestions coming in the
future. But please try to treat me as a peer. I'll do the same back.
Thank you.
We each have different ideas about what quality software means and the
compromises we make with the costs associated with it. Its important to
try and be tolerant and respectful and give positive reinforcement to
everyone who contributes to the project. I don't think it would harm if
*all* FOP
Hi,
A few comments:
- some time ago I created a BreakUtil class in the o.a.f.util package.
I think this class and KeepUtil should be put in the same place.
Perhaps we could even merge them into a unique KeepsAndBreaksUtil
class. I don’t really know what the best place would be. I put it in
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 18.04.2008 12:48:53 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi,
A few comments:
- some time ago I created a BreakUtil class in the o.a.f.util package.
I think this class and KeepUtil should be put in the same place.
Perhaps we could even merge them into a unique
On 18.04.2008 16:51:37 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 18.04.2008 12:48:53 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi,
A few comments:
- some time ago I created a BreakUtil class in the o.a.f.util package.
I think this class and KeepUtil should be put in the same place.
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 18.04.2008 16:51:37 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 18.04.2008 12:48:53 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi,
A few comments:
- some time ago I created a BreakUtil class in the o.a.f.util package.
I think this class and KeepUtil should be put in the
On 18.04.2008 19:24:05 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 18.04.2008 16:51:37 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 18.04.2008 12:48:53 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi,
A few comments:
- some time ago I created a BreakUtil class in the o.a.f.util package.
Easy please. Vincent has a preference. Jeremias is OK with it, but he
is not hot about it, so he is not going to do it. Vincent did not add
the new utilities, so he is not going to do it. That leaves Andreas to
do it, or me, or ..., or it remains undone. Fortunately, that would
not create a mess.
12 matches
Mail list logo
