Re: [PATCH] Support for percentages and table-units

2004-02-20 Thread Finn Bock
[me] If an expression reference another expression in a parent fo, the parent fo expression must be evaluated against the LayoutContext that was in effect for the parent fo and *not* against the child fo LayoutContext. fo:block id=a border-start-width=10% fo:block id=b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27107] New: - TTF Reader fails

2004-02-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27107. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27107] - TTF Reader fails

2004-02-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27107. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27111] New: - basic-link after some elements/attributes does not render hyperlink in output PDF

2004-02-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27111. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [PATCH] Support for percentages and table-units

2004-02-20 Thread J.Pietschmann
Finn Bock wrote: If it is evaluated already where would the evaluated value be stored? The layout context for the child LM could be an appropriate place. And then the value should be reverted to the expression when the base value changes due to breaks. No problem, this is known at the place

Re: Java thory and proctice: Garbase collection and performance

2004-02-20 Thread J.Pietschmann
John Austin wrote: Isn't allocation the only unseen part of construction ? Everything else is visible in the code and surely a few assignments are never expensive. Any other expensive operations will stand out in measurements of code execution. That's correct. However, the article seemed to shout

Re: [PATCH] Support for percentages and table-units

2004-02-20 Thread Finn Bock
If it is evaluated already where would the evaluated value be stored? [J.Pietschmann] The layout context for the child LM could be an appropriate place. The resolved property values of the parents should be stored in the layout context? I must be missing something here! And then the value

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23509] - Problem with marker 'first-starting-within-page'

2004-02-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23509. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Java thory and proctice: Garbase collection and performance

2004-02-20 Thread John Austin
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 15:46, J.Pietschmann wrote: *bg* Twenty years ago, I had to work on a 8008 driven computer with 4k RAM and 12k ROM. That's enough to run a program which nicely prints formatted and justified text (25 lines a 80 characters). We went a lng way since then. I went to a

Re: [PATCH] Support for percentages and table-units

2004-02-20 Thread Simon Pepping
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:52:41AM +0100, Finn Bock wrote: If an expression reference another expression in a parent fo, the parent fo expression must be evaluated against the LayoutContext that was in effect for the parent fo and *not* against the child fo LayoutContext. fo:block id=a

Re: [PATCH] Support for percentages and table-units

2004-02-20 Thread Simon Pepping
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 04:00:26PM -0800, Glen Mazza wrote: In general, yes, but not as 100%. We had this debate for months, with Victor holding fast to your view on the issue. We've done more spec research since then (I encourage you to read the parts of the spec I indicated in my posting)

Test - please ignore

2004-02-20 Thread Peter B. West
-- Peter B. West http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html

Re: [PATCH] Support for percentages and table-units

2004-02-20 Thread Peter B. West
Re-sending due to mailer problems. Peter Original Message Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for percentages and table-units Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:48:59 +1000 Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: -Original Message- From: Simon Pepping [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] In my view FOP

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26778] - [PATCH] Support for percentages and table-units

2004-02-20 Thread Peter B. West
Re-resending... Original Message Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26778] - [PATCH] Support for percentages and table-units Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:05:20 +1000 Simon Pepping wrote: I like the patch and the way RelativeNumericProperty holds and evaluates an expression tree

Re: [PATCH] Support for percentages and table-units

2004-02-20 Thread Peter B. West
Re-resending... Original Message Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for percentages and table-units Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 19:07:06 +1000 Finn Bock wrote: [me] If an expression reference another expression in a parent fo, the parent fo expression must be evaluated against the

Re: [PATCH] Support for percentages and table-units

2004-02-20 Thread Peter B. West
Re-resending... Original Message Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for percentages and table-units Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:20:52 +1000 Finn, When I apply your most recent patch (10366) against a cvs updated HEAD tree and attempt to compile, I get the following: [javac]