Roland wrote:
Hello,
I noticed that the apache project uses mostly XML files for
configuration. Personally I prefer using .properties files because
then I don't have the overhead of parsing the file each time. So what's
the advantage of using XML files?
They are hierarchical, can easily be
keiron 2002/12/05 01:30:16
Modified:src/documentation cocoon.diff forrest.diff
Log:
updated to latest cvs
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +18 -19xml-fop/src/documentation/cocoon.diff
Index: cocoon.diff
keiron 2002/12/05 02:29:12
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/image GifImage.java
Log:
use a dummy url connection to enable loading of gif image
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +58 -10xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/image/GifImage.java
Index: GifImage.java
Roland wrote:
I noticed that the apache project uses mostly XML files for
configuration. Personally I prefer using .properties files because
then I don't have the overhead of parsing the file each time. So what's
the advantage of using XML files?
Properties are flat and non unicode-aware,
Karen Lease wrote:
Peter,
...
... I will make a few comments on the redesign
issue. I agree with Arved that we certainly have some large problems to
face. As he points out, the mainstream redesign suffers from not being
understood and therefore from a lack of active contributors.
...
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 19:08, Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
Hello there!
Well, bugzilla shake-up is over, sorry if I closed something not-to-be-closed
or leave something-to-be-closed, but anyway I believe we can say bugzilla is
cleaned up now.
Now it's 111 entries in there (it was 188 IIRC):
Responses below.
-Original Message-
From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 5:27 PM
To: fop-dev
Subject: Redesign issues
This is the question that everyone has to answer. Blind faith that that
the problem can be solved by simply hurling onself
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 13:01, Peter B. West wrote:
There is an implication in what you are saying that you do have the
direction forward for the FO processor internalised, so to speak,
and
that a complete FO processor is, as Christian says, just a matter of
time. I, and I suspect Arved,
Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
Hello there!
What do you think about
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13586?
Stefan asks us to use something like
float currentLetterSpacing = (float) 9.99;
instead of
float currentLetterSpacing = Float.NaN
in PDFRenderer.java due to jre-1.3.1 for
J.Pietschmann wrote:
[..]
web.xml: keep it with the *.java.
I would prefer something like src/conf/web.xml
servlet.jar: provide a property for the location, defaulting
to lib/servlet.jar. Conditionalize the servlet compilation
on availability of ${servlet.jar}. Users can either copy a
Victor Mote wrote:
I see that Keiron has republished the web site. Here are some comments:
1. Keiron, would it help any, now that you have gotten the basic flow going,
for one of us to take the web-site publication burden from you? I know
Christian is involved in doc. If he does not wish to do
Hi all,
I just noticed bsf.jar in the lib directory and IIRC it was needed by
xalan1. As we switched to xalan2 some time ago is it ok for everyone if
I remove bsf.jar?
Christian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
How will we maintain the website after the copy? Change in trunk then
copy over to maint branch each time something is changed? Or can we
Yes, I'm not sure if automatic merging would work and I don't think
there will be a lot of changes.
Christian
Peter B. West wrote:
Victor Mote wrote:
While working on an FAQ for FO dtd schema, I see that we have
two schema
in docs/foschema: fop4f.xsd fop4.xsd. They are similar. Does
anyone know
what the purpose for both is, why we have 2, or the 4 4f designations?
Victor,
I think that
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15119.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13586.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Victor Mote wrote:
If no one objects, I would like to move this information to fop.xsd let
CVS handle the revision issues. The viewcvs program allows us to append a
revision number, so we could even branch tag this to keep it tied to
releases.
Sounds OK.
Peter
--
Peter B. West [EMAIL
Keiron Liddle wrote:
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 13:01, Peter B. West wrote:
There is an implication in what you are saying that you do have the
direction forward for the FO processor internalised, so to speak,
and
that a complete FO processor is, as Christian says, just a matter of
time. I, and
Rhett,
Nerver having used it, I am not aware of its capabilities. As I don't
develop in a Microsoft environment, and have no access to MS Visual C++,
and I don't run in a Solaris environment, my options for trying this are
limited.
If anyone else want to have a look I would be interested in
I have a Solaris box (Sun Blade 100) here at home, but the sources should compile on
Linux, I would think. I'm actually looking at integrating a jProf library into an
MBean for the JBoss project, and I did all my preliminary work on my Solaris box (some
of that research will be in the February
20 matches
Mail list logo
