Why is it more efficient (I know it is, given your
metrics, but want to know why)--aren't you just moving
the values already stored in the PropertyList into
separate fields in the FO objects? Yes, you're
releasing the PropertyList's memory, but the elements
that the PropertyList previously stored
I don't know what goes wrong here, but please try putting the latest
Xerces and Xalan releases in the jre/lib/endorsed directory of your JDK.
I temporarily took out my JARs in the endorsed directory to see if
anything changed but it didn't. Are you on JDK 1.4.2_something? I'm on
1.4.2_05.
On
Sorry for the delay.
On 12.10.2004 01:20:54 Glen Mazza wrote:
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glen,
I don't
particularly like selecting renderers by integer
constant.
FOP has been using integers for six years now, and as
I explained earlier [1], MIME types don't
On Oct 15, 2004, at 12:05 AM, Finn Bock wrote:
snip
In the rest of the elements, the set of fields matches the spec. The
only exception is a bug where the some of the inline LayoutManagers
uses vertical-align which is a shorthand. The layoutmanagers should
instead use the properties that the
Clay Leeds wrote:
snip/
When I look at the FOP Compliance page, I see a couple of items which
are implemented (I assume this page is in reference to the
0_20_2-maintain CVS branch--I am I correct in this assumption?).
Hi Clay - yes compliance page does refer to 0.20.5 functionality.
snip/
Chris
Simon Pepping wrote:
1. InlineStackingLM implements InlineLM. LineLM extends
InlineStackingLM and thus implements InlineLM. IMHO it should
not. Implementing InlineLM should be equivalent to
generatesInlineAreas returning true.
You are right, it's quite strange, but the LineLM still uses a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31206.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31206.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31206.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31206.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31206.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31206.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31206.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31206.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[Luca]
IMPORTANT: I had to revert Finn Bock's changes to the PDFRenderer (dated
2004/09/22 13:22:16), otherwise leaders with svg use-content produce
errors in the pdf output.
There isn't any run-time error, but when I try to open the pdf file, I get
these warnings:
- There was an error processing
[Clay]
Which of the alignment-* property is the one you're referring to that
has been implemented?
I was just looking at them from the point of view of the property
subsystem, where only baseline-shift has been implemented. I didn't
mean to imply that it actually work all the way through
On Oct 15, 2004, at 1:02 PM, Finn Bock wrote:
[Clay]
Which of the alignment-* property is the one you're referring to that
has been implemented?
I was just looking at them from the point of view of the property
subsystem, where only baseline-shift has been implemented. I didn't
mean to imply
Hi Gumpers,
we're currently facing a somewhat strange failure of FOP in Gump. I
don't have that failure locally. One of the other committers as a
different error but that's probably related to some weird Xerces problem.
It seems like the JUnit task doesn't pick up the test classes that were
Excellent. Thanks a lot!
On 15.10.2004 10:53:30 Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It seems like the JUnit task doesn't pick up the test classes that
were compiled beforehand.
Yes, because you didn't run unit tests before, it hasn't been
19 matches
Mail list logo
