Re: text-decoration in block

2001-06-06 Thread Christian Geisert
Hoang Nam wrote: Hello all, I have put the property text-decoration=underline in block level and it did not work . It works only in inline object. Could sombody tell me what I am doing wrong ? Could we have the property text-decoration in a block ? Or it is not implemented yet in

Re: Displaying PDF output on IE 5.0..

2001-06-16 Thread Christian Geisert
Prakash Kalidindi wrote: Hi I am working on FOP-0.18.1 ,and i have problem displaying the PDF output on IE 5.0,it just displays a blank screen, But on IE 5.5 the PDF output is shown though!! Could there be any problem with IE 5.0 in invoking the Acrobat reader?? Is that i need to

Re: Text-Transform

2001-06-22 Thread Christian Geisert
John Wyman wrote: I need to produce all capital output from possibly mixed input text, and the text-transform=uppercase seems to generate a not supported warning, this used to work in .12, am I doing something wrong ? Are you really sure that it worked with FOP 0.12 ? It is not supported

Re: Keep-with-previous

2001-06-26 Thread Christian Geisert
Falk wrote: Hello, i've got the following list where I included the keep-with-previous=always directive in order to prevent the list from beeing split at the end of the page. However the list does get split at the end of the page. Are there any other directives I could use ? AFAIK

Re: Text-Decoration (underline) Problem

2001-07-03 Thread Christian Geisert
John Wyman wrote: This used to work in .12 doesn't work in ,18 and up, I think it should, could someone look into it, please. I'm quite sure it did not work in 0.12 !! (And as I have done the code for text-decoration I should know ;-) Underline isn't done and I can't move the underline

Re: PDF2PS

2001-08-03 Thread Christian Geisert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi all, I have generated pdf file from xml by using FOP-0.19.0-CVS, but I don't know how to use Ghostscript to convert the pdf file to postscript file under Windows environment, can you help me? You do not need Ghostscript, FOP has a Postscript renderer ! Try

Re: Performance and java 1.1

2001-09-21 Thread Christian Geisert
Keiron Liddle wrote: [..] So the question is: can we drop java 1.1 support and use better data structures? +1 (I think we should make this an official vote) and AFAIK at the moment fop does not work with jdk1.1 anyway... Christian

Re: Performance and java 1.1

2001-09-21 Thread Christian Geisert
Alex McLintock wrote: [..] PS What are the rules for an official vote. I have been told off before for voicing my opinion about a vote in another Apache project. Basically I was told I couldn't vote because I hadn't contributed any source. Shockingly enough this is true for FOP too. see

Re: FOP on IBM AS400

2001-09-22 Thread Christian Geisert
Stephen Fry wrote: Hi We are attempting to port our application which uses fop 0.20.1 to the AS400. We seems to have some issues with FOP's use of AWT classes. Has anyone any experience of this environment ? Is it possible to configure FOP not to use AWT or is it fundemental ? We

Re: [Bug 4562]: XSL 1.0 uses master-reference now, not master-name

2001-11-23 Thread Christian Geisert
Keiron Liddle wrote: There is not likely to be a significant release that has this fixed any time soon. That is it may be several months. If some changes really need to be released then it may be possible to do a maintanence release. I would rather not since it takes time. I think we

Re: underlining, fo:inline and page breaks.

2001-11-28 Thread Christian Geisert
Beer, Christian wrote: Hi List! I have a problem. I want to underline the whole text, which may go over several pages. But to underline one must use fo:inline, right?? But using that At the moment: yes! I have started coding support for underline in blocks some time ago, but it's not

Re: FOP conformance

2001-11-30 Thread Christian Geisert
Keiron Liddle wrote: On 2001.11.30 15:39 Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: At 4:48 PM -0400 11/29/01, Arved Sandstrom wrote: This was already a known thing, and Norman Walsh pointed it out also. There is simply no point in fixing this until the FOP rewrite emerges. That's your choice.

Re: FOP conformance

2001-12-03 Thread Christian Geisert
Tore Engvig wrote: [..] The simple-page-master stuff that originated the whole maintenance release and Karen's table suggestions are still left to be done (Christian?) Yes, I hope to send the patches tomorrow (tuesday) Tore

Re: Maintanance release (was: FOP conformance)

2001-12-03 Thread Christian Geisert
it would be a good idea to add it with user-level integration as proposed by Betrand. Christian Geisert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Missing versions in Bugzilla

2001-12-05 Thread Christian Geisert
Hi, I just noticed the versions for FOP in Bugzilla are still at 0.17 Could someone please add the missing ones. Christian P.S: this is also a test mail as it seems the patch I sent one hour didn't make it to the list - To

[PATCH] update FOP (maintenance branch) to REC syntax

2001-12-05 Thread Christian Geisert
Hi, I finally managed to update FOP to REC syntax.. According to the documented changes at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/sliceF.html#changes http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/PR-xsl-20010828/sliceF.html#changes the biggest thing was the renaming of the master-name property to

[PATCH] update FOP (maintenance branch) to REC syntax

2001-12-05 Thread Christian Geisert
Hi, I finally managed to update FOP to REC syntax.. According to the documented changes at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/sliceF.html#changes http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/PR-xsl-20010828/sliceF.html#changes the biggest thing was the renaming of the master-name property to

timeframe for maintenance release

2001-12-06 Thread Christian Geisert
Hi, Arved already proposed 15 Dec as release date. I think it would be a good idea to do some testing before the actual release, so we should do a code freeze some days in advance. What about Monday the 10th ? Should we make another release candidate? Christian

Re: [PATCH] update FOP (maintenance branch) to REC syntax

2001-12-07 Thread Christian Geisert
Claus Nielsen wrote: Christian, When is page-position last correct implemented ? When someone sends a patch ;-) Seriously, I don't know anything about the current status of page-position last. Maybe Arved can comment on it ? Claus Christian

[PATCH] update test dir to REC syntax (maintenance branch)

2001-12-10 Thread Christian Geisert
Hi, this patch updates the 'test' dir to REC syntax. (just changed master-name to master-reference on page-sequences) I had some problems with strange line endings but I hope it is ok now. Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[PATCH] update test dir to REC syntax (maintenance branch)

2001-12-10 Thread Christian Geisert
Doh, forgot the attachment... this patch updates the 'test' dir to REC syntax. (just changed master-name to master-reference on page-sequences) I had some problems with strange line endings but I hope it is ok now. Christian

[PATCH] update documentation for maintenance release

2001-12-12 Thread Christian Geisert
Hi, I've taken a first look at the documentation and updated some links etc. You need to run makedoc in docs/xml-doc to generate the html documentation. I had a lot of problems to get makedoc.bat to work and after fixing those I realised that makedoc.sh had already been fixed. (Doh, should have

[PATCH] update documentation for maintenance release

2001-12-12 Thread Christian Geisert
I'm really sorry, forgot again the attachment ;-( Hi, I've taken a first look at the documentation and updated some links etc. You need to run makedoc in docs/xml-doc to generate the html documentation. I had a lot of problems to get makedoc.bat to work and after fixing those I realised that

[PATCH] text-decoration for blocks (maintenance branch)

2001-12-12 Thread Christian Geisert
Hi, this patch adds text-decoration support for blocks. There still some things I want to do (like inherit text-decoration from a parent inline, problems with hyphenation and nbsp). Christian Index: docs/examples/fo/textdeko.fo

Re: [PATCH] text-decoration for blocks (maintenance branch)

2001-12-13 Thread Christian Geisert
Tore Engvig wrote: Christian Geisert wrote: Hi, this patch adds text-decoration support for blocks. There still some things I want to do (like inherit text-decoration from a parent inline, problems with hyphenation and nbsp). Actually I think fop supports nbsp (more or less

[PATCH] fix for looping table bug (maintenance branch)

2002-01-07 Thread Christian Geisert
Hi, this patch should fix infinite looping on tables if keep_with or row spans are not fitting on a page. This hack just ignores all keeps for a table after the first page-break (sounds really simple :-) It would be better to check if the table starts already on top of the page but I found no

[PATCH] more text-decoration (maintenance branch)

2002-01-09 Thread Christian Geisert
Ok, this should be my last patch for this maintenance release ;-) It adds inheritance for the text-decoration property from parent inline or block elements and fixes a bug with non-breaking spaces (but not all) Christian Index: docs/examples/fo/textdeko.fo

uncommitted patches

2002-01-10 Thread Christian Geisert
Ok, while browsing the archives I found the following uncomitted patches, and as it is quite frustrating if your patch gets not noticed (and you worked hard for it..) we should try to commit all (if possible). * improved font-encoding by Peter S. Housel (see

Plan for maintenance release

2002-01-10 Thread Christian Geisert
Ok, I'm ready for the maintenance release ;-) The attached patch just updates the version number (and removes the JDK 1.1 stuff) Here is my plan: Make another release candidate (don't forget to update docs from cvs HEAD) Give some days for testing (there seem to be a lot of people interested

Re: uncommitted patches

2002-01-11 Thread Christian Geisert
Keiron Liddle wrote: Hi Christian, I agree that it is good to get patches in, the problem has been that in many cases these patches are altering messy code (eg. LineArea.java) and I had the same thoughts while looking at the patches... but I think it's ok for the maintenance branch. its

Re: Table layout

2002-01-11 Thread Christian Geisert
Matt Savino wrote: Right now keep-with-next at the row level is the only thing that works. But if you have more rows than can fit on a page, FOP goes into an endless loop. This issue isn't adressed at all in the upocoming maintenance release is it? It is adressed .. and you hereby

[ANNOUNCEMENT] FOP 0.20.3 Release Candidate available

2002-01-22 Thread Christian Geisert
Hi all, the Release Candidate for 0.20.3 (Maintenance release) is finally available at http://xml.apache.org/dist/fop for downloading and testing. This version has been updated to XSL 1.0 Recommendation syntax and requires (now officially) JDK 1.2 or better. Christian

Re: refocusing fop-dev and fop-user?

2002-01-25 Thread Christian Geisert
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Friday 25 January 2002 10:26, Jens von Pilgrim wrote: . . . On http://xml.apache.org/mail.html is only the fop-dev listed - is there also a user list? This is probably the cause - AFAIK fop-user is alive and kicking, just not listed in the proper places.

Re: [PATCH] Proper use of font encodings for native fonts

2002-01-31 Thread Christian Geisert
Arved Sandstrom wrote: Noted. Do you want to include this in the coming release ? Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Status maintenace release

2002-02-08 Thread Christian Geisert
Ok, just a short info about the current status of the maintenace release. Things I want to do for the release: -apply proper font econding patch by Peter S. Housel and Rainer Garus I've tested it and it's looks good, 'build test' showed a small difference in the width of '-' character. (I

Re: sax conflicts with tomcat-4.0.2-LE-jdk1.4

2002-02-12 Thread Christian Geisert
Joerg Pietschmann wrote: [..] I believe all this stuff could be replaced by JAXP 1.1 standard functionality. This means FOP could also be build with any JAXP 1.1 compatible XML/XSL library. This would also get rid of some unfortunate dependencies from Driver.getParserClassName() (why not

Re: remove html-docs dir?

2002-02-18 Thread Christian Geisert
Keiron Liddle wrote: Can I remove everything under docs/html-docs. +1 Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: FOP AWT Window Shuts Down Application

2002-02-20 Thread Christian Geisert
Keiron Liddle wrote: If it makes you feel better it has already been done. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-cvsm=101420095016596w=2 Someone might even commit this to the maintanence branch. Ok, I'll do it .. but it's to late for 0.20.3rc2 (which is already on icarus, waiting for

[ANNOUNCEMENT] FOP 0.20.3 Release Candidate 2 available

2002-02-21 Thread Christian Geisert
instead of ISO-8859-1 - MIF output strings escaping (see bug #1332) Submitted by: Vicente Salvador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Fixed NoSuchElementException in MIF renderer (Christian Geisert) - Added Polish Hyphenation based on TeX hypenation Submitted by: Marcin Kuthan [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] - Added

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] FOP 0.20.3 Release Candidate 2 available

2002-02-25 Thread Christian Geisert
I checked my patche. The resources.ja file which included my posted patch has NOT included in 0.20.3rc2. I repost only org/apache/fop/viewer/resources/resources.ja file. Please commit this file. Done Regards. --- Satoshi Ishigami VIC TOKAI CORPORATION Christian

Re: JDK 1.4 and fonts

2002-02-25 Thread Christian Geisert
Christopher Burkey wrote: Hi, Has anyone been able to compile FOP with JDK 1.4? It gets this far in the build process: [..] C:\src-workspaces\per\xml-fop\build\src\org\apache\fop\render\pdf\CodePointM apping.java [style] Failed to process

Re: JDK 1.4 and fonts

2002-02-25 Thread Christian Geisert
Ramaprabhu Janakiraman wrote: funny, i compiled 0.20.3-rc with 1.4-rc and everything was smooth except for some problems with svg/PDFGraphics2D.java (a new abstract method in java.awt.GraphicsConfiguration ) that i had to put a stub for, This worked for me too but then it didn't

Re: [Understanding] Images [4]

2002-02-25 Thread Christian Geisert
Keiron Liddle wrote: [..] There are a number of packages in Avalon that would be useful, such as command line parsing. I would be for an integration in general espacially since cocoon uses it. +1 Avalon sounds interesting (pooling etc.) but I did not have a close look yet. There will be

Re: PNG support in fop 0.20.3rc2

2002-02-25 Thread Christian Geisert
Sven Kitschke wrote: Hi all, after switching from fop 0.20.3rc to fop 0.20.3rc2 i was surprised about the broken PNG support. I got a lot of error messages like [ERROR]: Error while creating area : Error creating FopImage object (Error creating FopImage object

Re: break-before in table-row

2002-02-25 Thread Christian Geisert
Mickey, John wrote: I have a situation in FOP where it is dropping off the last table-row if it has a 'break-before' attribute set to 'page'. The second page is completely blank. It works correctly if the 'break-before' is not in the last table-row. Is this a bug in FOP or am I not

Re: problem building on macosx

2002-02-26 Thread Christian Geisert
Stephen Bannasch wrote: [..] The systems stops on the very first taskdef element in the build. taskdef name=serHyph classname=org.apache.fop.tools.anttasks.SerializeHyphPattern/ There are no classes in the anttasks dir for the taskdef to link serHyph to:

Re: problem building on macosx

2002-02-26 Thread Christian Geisert
Stephen Bannasch wrote: created buildtools.jar: [bash stephen:~/apache/xml-fop]ant -f buildtools.xml Buildfile: buildtools.xml You shouldn't have to build it yourself, it's included in lib/ which claimed success then ran build.sh which again dies on the first taskdef What

Re: fop-0.20.3rc2 problems

2002-02-28 Thread Christian Geisert
Keiron Liddle wrote: Hi Christian, There is one problem with the rc2. It appears that the TextState, ts, is not initialised in FObjMixed. Causing the following error. java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.fop.fo.FObjMixed.addCharacters(FObjMixed.java:47) at

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Fop 0.20.3 released

2002-03-12 Thread Christian Geisert
David B. Bitton wrote: I notice the timestamp on the files is 3/4. Is that right, because that means I already have code made fresh daily. Yeah, that correct. I've just been on holiday last week and had no time to send the announcement until now. David B. Bitton Christian

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Fop 0.20.3 released

2002-03-13 Thread Christian Geisert
Raimund Kammering wrote: Hi, in the announcement for the fop 0.20.3 release there was a note about EPS images. I am not sure what this means: a.) Now you can also use EPS images in the FOP - PDF process b.) FOP can now produce an EPS file as output For the announcement I just

Re: Using Avalon/Logkit

2002-03-15 Thread Christian Geisert
Michael Gratton wrote: [..] Out of curiosity, what was the name of that branch? Keiron mentioned elsewhere that I'd probably want to patch both branches - one is obviously going to be HEAD, the other I assumed was MAIN, but I'm not so sure now.. You get the maintenance branch with co -r

Re: Using Avalon/Logkit

2002-03-15 Thread Christian Geisert
Jeremias Maerki wrote: [..] That's a good point. Since I have a day off tomorrow and Michael is doing the logging stuff, I might look into the issue if FOP and JAXP might be able to get a bit closer together. I have already a JAXP patch from Joerg, I just had no time to apply it yet (I hope

Re: Using Avalon/Logkit

2002-03-17 Thread Christian Geisert
Michael Gratton wrote: [..] Anyway, a preliminary, but fully functional patch against the fop-0_20_3 branch can be found here: http://web.vee.net/fop/AvalonLogger-patch-20020315.jar. I just need to Committed. Mike. Christian

Re: Difference between fop.jar in distribution and after a new build.

2002-03-20 Thread Christian Geisert
Klosa Uwe wrote: Hi, I've got following problem: If I use the fop.jar, which is included in the distribution 20.0.3, my pdf-generation is working fine. When I run build.sh (with no errors), the resulting fop.jar is creating an error. The output contains only %PDF-1.3 %ª«¬­. In log

Re: Logging work: MessageHandler patch

2002-03-21 Thread Christian Geisert
Michael Gratton wrote: There was a problem with MessageHandler.error() in that patch. The attached patch fixes that and makes MessageHandler.log() a bit more readable. It also includes a fix for the outstanding ToBeImplementedProperty problem - by using MessageHandler. I've committed

JAXP / upgrade to xerces2

2002-03-25 Thread Christian Geisert
Hi all, I finally have Joerg's JAXP patch committed (well most part of it). FOP should now *run* with any JAXP1.1 compliant parser/transformer. I've succesfully tested it with Saxon 6.5.1 (which includes Aelfred) and JDK1.4 (which includes Crimson/Xalan). Still needs to be done: - build process

Re: How to get 20.3 to build

2002-04-04 Thread Christian Geisert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get this error when running build.sh compile: [echo] Compiling the sources [mkdir] Created dir: /home/husseinp/java/fop/fop-0.20.3/build/classes/org/apache/fop/viewer/resources [copy] Copying 11 files to

Re: fo:basic-link does not work in xsl-region-before?

2002-04-04 Thread Christian Geisert
Costantino Sertorio wrote: Hi, does anyone know if this is a FOP bug? Yes. It appears to me that a basic-link cannot be used in the region-before, as in the following snippet: fo:static-content flow-name=xsl-region-before fo:block fo:basic-link color=red

Re: fo:marker broken

2002-04-08 Thread Christian Geisert
J.Pietschmann wrote: Hi, fo:marker is broken in 0.20.3 and causes trouble with the docs/examples/marker stuff. The problem is that the TextState ts variable in FObjMixed is not set at all for Marker objects. The fix should be to copy the parent state as it is done in Block. Does someone

Re: Multithreaded failure

2002-04-08 Thread Christian Geisert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thats not the only problem. I get problems when loading an image when multithreaded. As previously posted. If I could build the darn thing, I might look into fixing it. Have you tried with jdk1.3 ? Maybe './build.sh -debug' gives some more info. Paul.

Re: [Vote] New committers: Peter West, Joerg Pietschmann?

2002-04-11 Thread Christian Geisert
Keiron Liddle wrote: I propose that we offer Peter West and Joerg Pietschmann to become committers. +1 and while we are at it in addition I would like to propose Jeremias Märki as committer (I'll send an extra mail) Christian

[Vote] New committer: Jeremias Maerki

2002-04-13 Thread Christian Geisert
Hi all, I would like to propose Jeremias Maerki as a new committert for Fop. Jeremias has already contibuted the PS Renderer and quite a few bugfixes/patches, helped to improve the documentation and is very helpful on the mailing lists. Here is my vote: +1 Christian

Re: Driver.run() bug in FOP 0.20-3?

2002-04-17 Thread Christian Geisert
Rhett Aultman wrote: Greetings FOP team. I was noticing the other day that, when I attempted to embed FOP in some software that I was writing, that the default activity for Driver.run() when no other XML parser is specified is this- [..] I saw no mention of this in Bugzilla, but I

Re: Fop with Cocoa Obj-C with Java

2002-04-25 Thread Christian Geisert
Rich Van Deren (???) wrote: I am Fopping now, embedded in an MacOS X Cocoa Application. I am so happy. [..] If any fop-dev folks want me to make it an example let me know if I should. In the Apache.org Xerces-C they make a Projects directory in the distribution source with

Re: build failure with J2SDK1.4

2002-04-25 Thread Christian Geisert
Cyril Rognon wrote: Hi Fopers I have checked out the 0.20.3 with a -r fop-0_20_3 version tag (think that's the right thing to do to get the 0.20.3 release) Yes, but if you want the current maintenance branch source use -r fop-0_20_2-maintain when I try to build FOP, I get an error

Re: Cleaning up bugzilla and next maintenance release

2002-04-26 Thread Christian Geisert
J.Pietschmann wrote: Hi committers, as you probably noticed, i started to rummage around in Bugzilla, searching for bugs still in existence and learning more about current and persistent problems. Great work, I hope I can help a bit soon. [..] Questions: Will there be another maintenance

Re: Czech translation for AWT viewer

2002-05-02 Thread Christian Geisert
Buchtk, Michal wrote: Hi Fops, I translate messages and resources for AWT viewer, can you commit it? It's in ISO-8859-2 coding. Does this work with current maintenance branch (or 0.20.3 final) ? The reason I'm asking is that the enconding of the resources has been changed to utf-8 with fop

Re: Czech translation for AWT viewer

2002-05-02 Thread Christian Geisert
Buchtk, Michal wrote: Hi, i forgot for encoding change. I convert it to UTF-8 a test it with current maintain branch. It works ok. See new attachment. Committed, thanks for your contribution. Thanks for notice. Michal Christian

Re: [PATCH] Proper use of font encodings for native fonts

2002-05-16 Thread Christian Geisert
Keiron Liddle schrieb: One reason for waiting was to see how it would work. There are some user issues that have popped up but nothing too serious. It would be good to know how people should deal with this situation. A new patch would certainly help. Christian might be able to say more

Re: new batik

2002-05-16 Thread Christian Geisert
Keiron Liddle schrieb: Hi, Since a new beta of batik has been released I think we can go with this for the next release. I will put the new batik into cvs and update the code to work with it. Is it possible to make Fop work without batik.jar ? (of course if no svg is used) Keiron.

Re: Character encoding on other platforms (previously os/390)

2002-05-16 Thread Christian Geisert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I've had a couple folks ask me for the modified code so the proper character encoding is returned on the toString().getBytes() is US-ASCII. This is cool that other people besides me need this. [..] I downloaded this snapshot xml-fop_20020515162132 and I don't see

Re: status on website

2002-05-16 Thread Christian Geisert
Keiron Liddle schrieb: Hi, I added some status info to the website. So hopefully this will answer Cool some peoples questions (I'm sure they will still want to know more things that are unknown). Sure ;-) Any comments, complaints, suggestions? (apart from my poor spelling!) Maybe put

Next maintenace release

2002-05-21 Thread Christian Geisert
Ok, as a lot of people want a date for the next release I propose 1st of june as target date for the release candidate for 0.20.4 What do you think? Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: build changes

2002-05-21 Thread Christian Geisert
Peter B. West schrieb: Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, What's the state of play now with the changes to the build system? Has the elimination of Xalan1 been completed? Who's doing what there? Xalan1 has been removed. Upgrade of xerces/xalan hasn't been done yet (but I'll hopefully

Re: basedir fix for fop 0.20.4

2002-05-22 Thread Christian Geisert
Jeremias Maerki schrieb: Please attach the patch as attachment to the bugreport. Hopefully, I or someone else will look at it before the release. There is already another patch which seems to adress this (and more?): http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=102036672926722w=2 Yes, this

Re: AW: Running Prefligh PDF tools on PDF files produced by FOP

2002-05-24 Thread Christian Geisert
J.U. Anderegg schrieb: Matt, Matthew, can you send me a sample doc in error - as small as possible? I will have a look at it. Maybe this is related to the following bug: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9054 Hansuli Anderegg Christian

Re: Running Prefligh PDF tools on PDF files produced by FOP

2002-05-28 Thread Christian Geisert
Matthew Brook O'Donnell schrieb: I've found that FOP 0.20.1 and 0.20.2 produce PDFs that do not cause a 'fatal PDF error' in PitStop, even without the modification of (_data.size() + 1) to _data.size() in the PDFStream class that Hansuli proposed. However, I haven't been able to produce

Re: Build problems Could not read filters from file:

2002-05-28 Thread Christian Geisert
Elliotte Rusty Harold schrieb: I'm trying to compile FOP 0.20.3 to add PMG support through JIMI. However, all builds keep dying like this: BUILD FAILED J:\fop-0.20.3\build.xml:293: Could not read filters from file: J:\fop-0.20.3\build\src\codegen\filter This is not just regular

delay for release candidate

2002-06-03 Thread Christian Geisert
Hi all, as you probably have noticed the date for the release candidate has been reached but I would like to see the following things done for 0.20.4: (new target date: next weekend ;-) - fix broken PDFs http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9054

Re: How do you edit your XML files?

2002-06-03 Thread Christian Geisert
ewitness - Ben Fowler wrote: [..] A 'proper' XML editor/IDE would be very useful for examining XML and FO files, parsing and validating them and processing with XSLT. Is there already a project in existence that does this? Jedit (www.jedit.org) seems to do is (and a lot more ..) I just

Fop and JDK1.2

2002-06-10 Thread Christian Geisert
Hi, Building Fop with JDK1.2 does not work at the moment. The problem is the method java.awt.Font.createFont(..) which is used by the AWT viewer for displaying truetype fonts and is avaible first since JDK1.3. So what should we do? 1) Declare that Fop needs JDK1.3 2) Remove truetype font

Re: delay for release candidate

2002-06-10 Thread Christian Geisert
Peter B. West schrieb: Christian, What's the latest? I have just patched .../fo/flow/BasicLink.java to My plan was to make the RC later this evening (european time). But I've just seen a patch from Oleg which would be nice to have in the RC and Jeremias is working on the PS renderer. So I

manifest classpath (was: Re: delay for release candidate)

2002-06-10 Thread Christian Geisert
Arved Sandstrom schrieb: Christian, if it's not already changed, this release would be a good opportunity to modify the manifest file Class-Path so that it does not expect JARs inside a lib/ directory. As was discussed some time back this is awkward for a number of J2EE servers. If nothing

Re: [PATCH] list of font family names in font-family property

2002-06-10 Thread Christian Geisert
Oleg Tkachenko wrote: Hello! Here is my patch on font-family property implementation. It allows the propery to contain comma-separated list of font family names. Actually this patch doesn't go so far as spec does by introducing concept of glyph lookup in each font in turn, it only

release candidate (was: Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/render/ps...)

2002-06-12 Thread Christian Geisert
Jeremias Maerki schrieb: I forgot to add the following changes to the log: - Changed the positioning of text elements (I'm using more absolute positioning instead of relative becaus it leads to suboptimal results. We need to analyze the cause in more detail.) - Make SVG work from

Re: PDF-files generated with FOP rejected by RIP engines

2002-06-12 Thread Christian Geisert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi I have a problem with PDFs generated by FOP. I am generating PDFs that are supposed to be sent directly to a printer via a RIP engine. FOP seems to embed the entire image into the PDF resulting in a huge (size) PDF (depending of image file of course). All RIP

Re: Fop and JDK1.2

2002-06-13 Thread Christian Geisert
Peter B. West schrieb: Can anyone answer the questions below? Hopefully, before the release. Ok (building the RC atm ;-) I think we need to discuss these issues in more depth. We have people using FOP in production, and, in spite of the fact that everyone is aware that FOP is pre-beta,

[ANNOUNCEMENT] FOP 0.20.4 Release Candidate available

2002-06-13 Thread Christian Geisert
Hi all, the Release Candidate for 0.20.4 is available at http://xml.apache.org/dist/fop for downloading and testing. It is planed to make the actual release in about a week (or two?) if no serious bugs show up. Changes since 0.20.3 include: - Support for background-image - FOP should now work

Re: Fwd: Re: Fop and JDK1.2

2002-06-20 Thread Christian Geisert
Ralph LaChance schrieb: [..] Plus this: I work from the premise that most users of fop will prefer ~not~ to explicitly configure their own fonts (unless the locale require it) but will take the built-ins -- which to my mind, means those supplied by Java. Would that be an um ~naive~

Re: image support (was: RE: Fop and JDK1.2 (using ant copy tasksto select implementations))

2002-06-20 Thread Christian Geisert
Keiron Liddle schrieb: On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 11:05, Rob Smith wrote: Everyone who needs PNG support? Batik has a png decoder, a png encoder, a tiff encoder and a tiff decoder. So what about using those ? (we ship batik anyway..) While we are stuck with a obselete library that we can't

Re: Fop and JDK1.2

2002-06-20 Thread Christian Geisert
Peter B. West schrieb: [..] I noticed again, following Satoshi's email, that we have no tags for RCs. I think this is an oversight which should be addressed. Are there I didn't think about a tag for a RC yet.. But the whole release process should be documented somewhere like the batik

Re: FOP in the forrest

2002-06-21 Thread Christian Geisert
Keiron Liddle schrieb: Hi, In order to improve the information, process and updating I suggest we start using better document systems. Forrest is the first thing that will help us here. With a supplement to the sitemap (not sure how to do this) we can also display FOP better. We can have

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] FOP 0.20.4 Release Candidate available

2002-06-21 Thread Christian Geisert
Martin Peina schrieb: [..] It works fine, just two things: 1) If baseDir is set for example to /opt/fop, FOP doesn't add / at the end of baseDir as other systems commonly does, so you can start use path for fonts like this: font

plan for 0.20.4 release

2002-06-27 Thread Christian Geisert
Ok, here is the plan for the 0.20.4 release First there are the following uncommitted patches: - reload functionality for AWT viewer http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=102415975220531w=2 - implementation of margin shorthand http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=102483701915153w=2 -

Re: documentation for the maintenance branch

2002-06-27 Thread Christian Geisert
J.Pietschmann schrieb: [..] The last checkin showed a generate commit notification mail or something, but I didn't get one either. AFAIK your commit mail needs to be approved once. Best thing would be to ask root. J.Pietschmann Christian

Re: documentation for the maintenance branch

2002-06-27 Thread Christian Geisert
Joerg Pietschmann schrieb: [..] That's exactly what I'm currently doing, the HTML and the intermediate document-DTD files are produced in the build directory. Unfortunately, as I already noted, it's an all-or-nothing thing unless you are comfortable with broken doc builds for some time.

Re: System.exit stuff

2002-07-01 Thread Christian Geisert
Oleg Tkachenko schrieb: Hello! btw, I've just noticed AWT previewer is broken in cvs maintenance branch. Actually the previewer itself is ok, but it is closed when page I noticed this while testing your patch ;-) is ready to show due to System.exit(0) at the end of Fop.java main

Re: System.exit stuff

2002-07-01 Thread Christian Geisert
Keiron Liddle schrieb: On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 16:54, Christian Geisert wrote: Simplest solution seems to be to remove System.exit(0) from Fop.java (I'll committ this together with Oleg's patch) You do know that every second person will complain that FOP hangs if you remove this. :/ Mmmh

Re: plan for 0.20.4 release

2002-07-01 Thread Christian Geisert
Jeremias Maerki schrieb: Hi Christian here is the plan for the 0.20.4 release [..] There is a bug that needs to be fixed IMHO (or to be documented as known issue): - fo:list-item-label at the end of line http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9864 IMHO this is no showstopper

Re: System.exit stuff

2002-07-03 Thread Christian Geisert
J.Pietschmann schrieb: Keiron Liddle wrote: That explains it. The execution is separated between the CommandLineStarter and the AWTStarter and it needs to call exit when being run with the CommandLineStarter but not the AWTStarter. I've added other exits() in the catch clauses. Could

  1   2   3   >