RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-03-07 Thread Thomas E Deweese
> "SG" == Swapan Golla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: SG> I am trying to use batik extensions through FOP. I added SG> BatikElementMapping and BatikObj objects into my FOP src and then SG> registered them in the driver class but I am still getting some SG> exceptions. Can anybody help me out ?

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - xml-fop

2003-06-02 Thread Thomas E Deweese
> "JM" == Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JM> However, I'm worrying about binary compatibility. At the moment we JM> have to tell our users that they have to use the Batik-version JM> delivered with FOP. I'd like to see Batik's API stabilize some JM> more so people can just downloa

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - xml-fop

2003-06-03 Thread Thomas E Deweese
> "JM" == Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> FOP is a special customer and I am actually quite surprised that >> you are creating subclasses of GraphicsNode (I understand what is >> being done there but I could have suggested a couple of 'better' >> ways to do it I think). JM> Wel