RE: [PATCH] changes to bugs.xml doc
Keiron Liddle wrote: I'm not really sure what is the source of the problem. A few of the patches had hunks failing and some worked with fuzz offsets. One error meesage I got was that it couldn't find the character on line 9, so I went to line 9 and found the character, of course it was really looking for . Well, that was probably my bad for not using the universal diff format (I need to start doing these at 2pm instead of 2am). The behavior I saw a few minutes ago makes me think that IE may be getting confused by the fact that these patches are for XML files, and that it is treating them as such instead of as plain old text files. Maybe archiving the patch might work better. I'll try to remember to do that. Anyway there are better ways of solving this problem. I do not understand. Victor Mote - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [PATCH] changes to bugs.xml doc
Keiron Liddle wrote: Still having some trouble with diffs, it might be something to do with downloading via IE. Thanks for pointing this out -- I didn't realize there was a problem. I do use IE to upload the attachments through Bugzilla. Do you think that is the source of the problem? Also, since I don't see it, I don't know what problem you are seeing. Is it best practice to use a different browser? Victor Mote - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [PATCH] changes to bugs.xml doc
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 18:59, Victor Mote wrote: Keiron Liddle wrote: Still having some trouble with diffs, it might be something to do with downloading via IE. Thanks for pointing this out -- I didn't realize there was a problem. I do use IE to upload the attachments through Bugzilla. Do you think that is the source of the problem? Also, since I don't see it, I don't know what problem you are seeing. Is it best practice to use a different browser? I'm not really sure what is the source of the problem. A few of the patches had hunks failing and some worked with fuzz offsets. One error meesage I got was that it couldn't find the character on line 9, so I went to line 9 and found the character, of course it was really looking for . Maybe archiving the patch might work better. Anyway there are better ways of solving this problem. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14606] - [PATCH] changes to bugs.xml doc
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14606. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14606 [PATCH] changes to bugs.xml doc [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-18 12:51 --- patch committed. The changed dtd was not committed, mainly because I had some trouble with the patch and didn't put it in. Should we instead change all dtd declarations for all xml documents to keep it consistent. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] changes to bugs.xml doc
Keiron Liddle wrote (while committing patch from Bug 14606): patch committed. The changed dtd was not committed, mainly because I had some trouble with the patch and didn't put it in. Should we instead change all dtd declarations for all xml documents to keep it consistent. I did not realize until I looked right now that I failed to use the -u option on my diff. Sorry about that. Yes, we should change all of the declarations to be consistent. I'll go ahead do that en masse instead of piecemeal. Victor Mote - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14606] - [PATCH] changes to bugs.xml doc
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14606. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14606 [PATCH] changes to bugs.xml doc --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-15 20:12 --- Created an attachment (id=3866) patch for src/documentation/content/xdocs/bugs.xml - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
