Re: [RTF] jfor progress

2003-07-09 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Victor, Thanks for your work! ...I *really* like the approach of having the independent package, and recommend that we use the same approach for other StructureRenderers, including MIF Yes, the StructureRenderer interface nicely decouples these renderers from the rest of FOP. Maybe a

RE: [RTF] jfor progress

2003-07-09 Thread Victor Mote
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Maybe a new build target that creates a standalone fop-rtflib.jar would be good? I'd still keep rtflib in the main fop.jar, but offer a standalone rtflib in addition. +1 Note that the interest for a MIF renderer is probably lower than it was before, as newer

Re: [RTF] jfor progress

2003-07-08 Thread Glen Mazza
--- Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Question for Everyone: I *really* like the approach of having the independent package, and recommend that we use the same approach for other StructureRenderers, including MIF, and the yet-unborn merely-glimmers-in-my-mind RawText and TeX renderers.

Re: [RTF] jfor progress

2003-07-08 Thread Glen Mazza
--- Glen Mazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Question for Everyone: I *really* like the approach of having the independent package, and recommend that we use the same approach for other StructureRenderers, including MIF, and the yet-unborn