> Isn't the jai.jar (which would give fop great functionality!) not
> redistributet for the same reason?
Yes.
I think the javax.imageio package is where Jimi and Jai were leading. So once
jdk1.4 can be used...
> Best Regards
>
> Markus Schäffler
--
> Did you know that the Cocoon guys have jimi.jar in their CVS? I wonder
> if that's correct and if yes, I think we should do it, too.
>From my reading of it, by downloading the jar you automatically agree to the
license. This is quite different to ASL.
It is also non-transferable, I think that m
I think this is overdue! Most developer, like me, do not know a lot about
the different Licences out in the wild. There must be a reliable Homepage were
the Apache Project can build up on his own definition, about what is allowed
and what is not. This should include of course information for the us
- forwarding to incubator and licensing lists -
- note: licensing is not open to all -
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Did you know that the Cocoon guys have jimi.jar in their CVS? I wonder
if that's correct and if yes, I think we should do it, too.
Reading the licence I get the impression th
Did you know that the Cocoon guys have jimi.jar in their CVS? I wonder
if that's correct and if yes, I think we should do it, too.
Reading the licence I get the impression that redistribution of the jar
is possible but not without restrictions. IANAL so who can we ask if
distributing this jar is o
