Doubled commit messages

2004-07-24 Thread Peter B. West
Is anyone else getting double cvs commit messages?  I assume I am 
subscribed under more than one address, but my guess at what the 
redundant address might be has proved fruitless.

Peter
--
Peter B. West http://cv.pbw.id.au/


Re: Doubled commit messages

2004-07-24 Thread Glen Mazza
No, but I just subscribe to the digest version of
fop-cvs.

Glen

--- Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Is anyone else getting double cvs commit messages? 
 I assume I am 
 subscribed under more than one address, but my guess
 at what the 
 redundant address might be has proved fruitless.
 
 Peter
 -- 
 Peter B. West http://cv.pbw.id.au/
 



Re: Doubled commit messages

2004-07-24 Thread Clay Leeds
Have you tried looking at the Long Headers (aka Full Headers, 
Extended Headers, etc.)? Looking at the Long Headers for both messages 
should provide insight into which address is 'extra'.

Web Maestro Clay
On Jul 24, 2004, at 10:38 AM, Peter B. West wrote:
	From: 	  Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED]
	Subject: 	Doubled commit messages
	Date: 	July 24, 2004 10:38:28 AM PDT
	To: 	  fop-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
	Reply-To: 	  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
	Return-Path: 	[EMAIL PROTECTED]
	Received: 	from firewall.medata.com (tustin-net-firewall-int 
[172.24.0.1]) by mail.medata.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 
i6OHcjXL022421 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 
verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 10:38:45 -0700
	Received: 	from [209.237.227.199] (helo=mail.apache.org) by 
firewall.medata.com with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BoQTv-0006h2-Fy for 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 10:38:47 -0700
	Received: 	(qmail 68225 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2004 17:38:44 
-
	Received: 	(qmail 68208 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2004 17:38:44 -
	Received: 	from [203.12.160.103] (HELO mail.tpgi.com.au) 
(203.12.160.103) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 
Jul 2004 10:38:39 -0700
	Received: 	from tpg.com.au (203-219-25-88-bri-ts2-2600.tpgi.com.au 
[203.219.25.88]) by mail.tpgi.com.au (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
i6OHcTsp013687 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) 
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 03:38:31 +1000
	Mailing-List: 	contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
	Precedence: 	bulk
	List-Help: 	mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
	List-Unsubscribe: 	mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
	List-Post: 	mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
	Delivered-To: 	mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
	X-Asf-Spam-Status: 	No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 
tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
	X-Spam-Check-By: 	apache.org
	Message-Id: 	[EMAIL PROTECTED]
	User-Agent: 	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) 
Gecko/20040124
	X-Accept-Language: 	en-us, en
	Mime-Version: 	1.0
	Content-Type: 	text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
	Content-Transfer-Encoding: 	7bit
	X-Tpg-Antivirus: 	Passed
	X-Virus-Checked: 	Checked
	X-Spam-Score: 	-0.5 (/)
	X-Scan-Signature: 	9b27bf4a4363194e7857fe52dc7bbea4
	X-Synonym: 	Copied by Synonym (http://www.modulo.ro/synonym) to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
	X-Virus-Scanned: 	clamd / ClamAV version 0.75, clamav-milter version 
0.75 on mail.medata.com
	X-Virus-Status: 	Clean
	X-Spam-Checker-Version: 	SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on 
mail.medata.com
	X-Spam-Level: 	
	X-Spam-Status: 	No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
autolearn=ham  version=2.63
	X-Sanitizer: 	This message has been sanitized!
	X-Sanitizer-Url: 	http://mailtools.anomy.net/
	X-Sanitizer-Rev: 	$Id: Sanitizer.pm,v 1.87 2004/05/07 17:42:12 bre 
Exp $

Is anyone else getting double cvs commit messages?  I assume I am 
subscribed under more than one address, but my guess at what the 
redundant address might be has proved fruitless.

Peter
--
Peter B. West http://cv.pbw.id.au/



Re: Doubled commit messages

2004-07-24 Thread Peter B. West
Clay,
Yes I had, but I had failed to spot the relevant details.  Thanks for 
making me look again.

Peter
Clay Leeds wrote:
Have you tried looking at the Long Headers (aka Full Headers, Extended 
Headers, etc.)? Looking at the Long Headers for both messages should 
provide insight into which address is 'extra'.
--
Peter B. West http://cv.pbw.id.au/