DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33801] New: - FOP 0.20.5 AWTRenderer: Sometimes rendering fails in the middle of a table with no error message
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33801. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33801 Summary: FOP 0.20.5 AWTRenderer: Sometimes rendering fails in the middle of a table with no error message Product: Fop Version: 0.20.5 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: awt renderer AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] My french team and I work on a Java project and we plan to embed FOP 0.20.5 for the needed print reports. We experience a problem when we are using the AWT renderer with documents that contain tables. Sometimes, a page is cut in the middle of a table and its header (fo:region-before) is missing. As far as we have investigated we can say that: * We have neither abnormal output message, nor exception stack trace. * We only experience this problem with the AWT renderer. Using the PCL renderer works fine (but it lacks multibyte characters support that is critical for some of our translated releases). * We only experience this problem on a true printer (we have tried several models from HP and OKI). We never reproduced the problem using a fake printer such as Adobe Acrobat Distiller. * With the FO document (bug.fo) that is attached, we experience the problem 20% of the time when launching the printing from our application (we tried both java.awt.print and javax.print APIs). When using the `fop.bat' script, we experience the problem 100% of the time with the same FO document. fop.bat -fo bug.fo -print We tried JDK 1.4.1_07 and 1.4.2_07. * So far, 100% of the time it happened, tables were involved in the document. * Using the same FO document and the same FOP command line several times may result in having the bug occuring on different pages of the document. The printing does not fail systematically at the same point of the document. I have attached: You can download http://www.guillaumeponce.org/fop/bug.fo.zip The reference FO document we have used to investigate this problem (zipped). You can also download http://www.guillaumeponce.org/fop/bug.pdf It is 12 Mb large. It is an actual 8 pages long paper print that has been scanned. You can see that the problemI describe occured on page 7 out of 8. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33801] - FOP 0.20.5 AWTRenderer: Sometimes rendering fails in the middle of a table with no error message
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33801. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33801 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-02 10:11 --- Created an attachment (id=14386) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14386action=view) Test case for the bug fop.bat -fo bug.fo -print Rendering should fail. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33801] - FOP 0.20.5 AWTRenderer: Sometimes rendering fails in the middle of a table with no error message
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33801. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33801 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-02 13:39 --- (In reply to comment #0) I could also reproduce the bug using FOP 0.20.5 and the provided bug.fo. It occured on page 2 out of 8. As far as we have investigated we can say that: * We have neither abnormal output message, nor exception stack trace. Same here for me (also using the command line option -d) * We only experience this problem with the AWT renderer. Using the PCL renderer works fine (but it lacks multibyte characters support that is critical for some of our translated releases). Haven't tried it. * We only experience this problem on a true printer (we have tried several models from HP and OKI). We never reproduced the problem using a fake printer such as Adobe Acrobat Distiller. Same here: the output in the Window of the AWT-Renderer looks fine. Only at printing comes a problem. If you (FOP Team) suspect that the problem lies in the AWT-Renderer, I could try to investigate. HTH, Renaud -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3497] - id already exists error when using span=all attribute
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3497. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3497 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] OS/Version|Linux |All Platform|PC |All --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-18 05:33 --- Any chance that some kind committer will commit this patch? The patch has been languishing for ALMOST THREE YEARS, which is quite a while in internet time :-) I have applied it and it fixed a bug for me too (NB the bug is not dependent on span=all). But it would be nice not to have to maintain a private build of FOP. I would like to see it fixed in Cocoon, but this will have to wait for an official FOP release. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?
Jeremias Maerki wrote: [Glen Mazza] So Luca is correct that both fo:simple-page-masters should generate the same overall margins of 50 pt. each, no? No. :-) Ok, now I am convinced you are right. Thanks for all your explanations, I always found this part of the recommendation quite obscure! Regards, Luca
Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?
--- Glen Mazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This IMO is the fatal flaw in your logic in your previous email. You determined fo:s-p-m and fo:r-b to be type (1) FO's, and hence used the wrong equations in 5.3.2 to determine calculated values for them. They are type (3) FO's, and hence the first two equations can never be relevant for them. Oops! The second equation set in 5.3.2 *can* be relevant for an FO that does not generate areas. It is not applicable for the fo:region-body in Luca's example, however, because margin- was not explicitly specified on it. Hence, we are left with the third equation set. Glen
Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?
Damn, Glen, thanks for being so insistent. I was indeed wrong. You didn't really give me the prove I needed to be rewired but you got me looking again all over the spec and I found what was wrong: It doesn't really matter if the FOs generate reference areas or not, the key is that 5.3.2 is talking exclusively about block-level FOs. See the comment within paratheses in the first and second paragraphs in 5.3.2, for example: There are two more properties, end-indent and start-indent (block-level formatting objects) which correspond... p-s-m and r-b are no block-level FOs. D'Oh! Even though p-s-m and r-b refer to the 7.10 Common Margin Properties-Block, the properties space-before|after and start|end-indent only apply to block-level FOs. Sections 6.4.12 and 6.4.13 explain that the margin-* properties have to be used to calculate the indents for these the two FOs in question. I used start|end-indent. :-( So the 5.3.2 rules cannot be triggered, not because p-s-m and r-b don't generate reference area, but because they are no block-level FOs!!! In this light you were right to complain about my bringing in the block-container example. Still, RenderX is wrong about the block-container thing. That part still stands. RenderX (and AntennaHouse) deliberately chose to break inheritance rules in these cases. This is documented in [1]. But as you say, this is a different story. [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/08/28-XSL-PR-DOC.html (see comment 20) Wow, now I need a pause. Thank you, Glen! Jeremias Maerki
Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It doesn't really matter if the FOs generate reference areas or not, the Well, the Recommendation declares which of the three types each FO belongs to, in the Areas section in each FO definition. It is a static answer that holds for all FO's of a given type, i.e. it is not something dynamically dependent on how a particular instance of an FO is currently used in processing. So there should not need to be any debate of whether any FO (1) generates areas, (2) returns areas, or is (3) used in generating areas -- we would have a bug in the Rec if it were vague for any particular FO. Glen
Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?
I noticed a strange behaviour concerning margins that could be related to the inheritance of start-indend and end-indent, which was discussed a few weeks ago. It seems that in some situations the margins are subtracted twice from the available inline progression dimension. In the little fo file I'm attaching there are two simple-page-masters: - in one of them, left and right margins are set inside simple-page-master itself - in the other, they are set inside region-body In both cases, the page width is 200 points, with left and right margin set to 50 points; so, the line width should be 100 points. In the method PageSequenceLayoutManager.getViewportRectangle(), the computed ipd is right when the margins are set in region-body, but it is 0 if they are set in simple-page-master, because relDims.ipd is already 100 and start- end-indent are 50. As this method has not been modified recently, the error (if this behaviour is really wrong) must be elsewhere ... Regards, Luca ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? fo:root xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format; xmlns:svg=http://www.w3.org/2000/svg; fo:layout-master-set fo:simple-page-master master-name=marginsInMaster page-height=800pt page-width=200pt margin-top=60pt margin-bottom=60pt margin-left=50pt margin-right=50pt fo:region-body/ /fo:simple-page-master fo:simple-page-master master-name=marginsInRegion page-height=800pt page-width=200pt margin-top=60pt margin-bottom=60pt fo:region-body margin-left=50pt margin-right=50pt/ /fo:simple-page-master /fo:layout-master-set fo:page-sequence master-reference=marginsInMaster hyphenate=true language=it text-align=justify fo:flow flow-name=xsl-region-body fo:block background-color=pink font-size=16pt font-weight=bold space-after=5mmcorto piccolo mini super qualcosa corto qui e qui precipitevolissimevolmente e poi ancora bla bla bla e ancora qualche parola./fo:block /fo:flow /fo:page-sequence fo:page-sequence master-reference=marginsInRegion hyphenate=true language=it text-align=justify fo:flow flow-name=xsl-region-body fo:block background-color=pink font-size=16pt font-weight=bold space-after=5mmcorto piccolo mini super qualcosa corto qui e qui precipitevolissimevolmente e poi ancora bla bla bla e ancora qualche parola./fo:block /fo:flow /fo:page-sequence /fo:root
Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?
Hi Luca, the reason for the effect you're seeing is the inheritance of start-indent and end-indent. In your exapmle, if you specify a margin-left and margin-right on the simple-page-master, this results (corresponding properties) in a start-indent and end-indent of 50pt each. Now, because start|end-indent are inherited, region-body also starts with a start-indent and end-indent of 50pt which together with the parent's start-indent accumulates 100pt because each of the FOs are generating a reference area. If you'd do this on nested blocks you wouldn't see this behaviour because they don't establish a new reference area. That's really one of the things I stumbled upon and which I believe after a lot of thinking to be the correct behaviour given by the spec. RenderX seem to have chosen to break inheritance in these cases because they create strange effects like you found out now. It took me some time to get used to it. So in your case you could specify a margin=0pt on the region-body which triggers the first formula given in 5.3.2. If you don't specify margin the inherited value for start-indent is used. There are other instances like on tables where you have to start specifying start-indent=0pt and end-indent=0pt on table-body if you have a margin on fo:table. I'm 99.9% sure that the current behaviour is correct even if it produces strange results for the XSL-FO user. See my layout engine test cases where I have such auxiliary margin and start|end-indent properties in some places. On 15.02.2005 15:03:00 Luca Furini wrote: I noticed a strange behaviour concerning margins that could be related to the inheritance of start-indend and end-indent, which was discussed a few weeks ago. It seems that in some situations the margins are subtracted twice from the available inline progression dimension. In the little fo file I'm attaching there are two simple-page-masters: - in one of them, left and right margins are set inside simple-page-master itself - in the other, they are set inside region-body In both cases, the page width is 200 points, with left and right margin set to 50 points; so, the line width should be 100 points. In the method PageSequenceLayoutManager.getViewportRectangle(), the computed ipd is right when the margins are set in region-body, but it is 0 if they are set in simple-page-master, because relDims.ipd is already 100 and start- end-indent are 50. As this method has not been modified recently, the error (if this behaviour is really wrong) must be elsewhere ... Regards, Luca Jeremias Maerki
Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Luca, the reason for the effect you're seeing is the inheritance of start-indent and end-indent. In your exapmle, if you specify a margin-left and margin-right on the simple-page-master, this results (corresponding properties) in a start-indent and end-indent of 50pt each. Jeremias, I think I am missing something here. Margin-left and margin-right are different properties from start-indent and end-indent, so I'm unsure why inheritance between the two would be applicable in this case. How does specifying margin-left = 50pt result in the start-indent value being set to 50pt? (Corresponding properties just map ***-start to ***-left, etc. for an otherwise-same-named property so CP don't appear to be relevant to this issue. Does the spec declare margin-left and start-indent to be corresponding properties?) Thanks, Glen
Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?
On 15.02.2005 17:46:54 Glen Mazza wrote: --- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Luca, the reason for the effect you're seeing is the inheritance of start-indent and end-indent. In your exapmle, if you specify a margin-left and margin-right on the simple-page-master, this results (corresponding properties) in a start-indent and end-indent of 50pt each. Jeremias, I think I am missing something here. Margin-left and margin-right are different properties from start-indent and end-indent, so I'm unsure why inheritance between the two would be applicable in this case. How does specifying margin-left = 50pt result in the start-indent value being set to 50pt? First rule in 5.3.2 for FOs that generate reference areas: start-indent = margin-corresponding + padding-corresponding + border-corresponding-width. (Corresponding properties just map ***-start to ***-left, etc. for an otherwise-same-named property so CP don't appear to be relevant to this issue. Does the spec declare margin-left and start-indent to be corresponding properties?) Yes, also in 5.3.2: There are two more properties, end-indent and start-indent (block-level formatting objects) which correspond to the various absolute margin properties. Jeremias Maerki
Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?
Yes, I was probably not 100% correct in my explanation though my interpretation still stands. On 15.02.2005 18:02:14 Glen Mazza wrote: Oh--5.3.2 says: There are two more properties, end-indent and start-indent (block-level formatting objects) which correspond to the various absolute margin properties. I'm uncertain that that means that they are Corresponding Properties however--I wonder if you are reading too much into the word correspond. Jeremias Maerki
Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?
But if start-indent and margin-left are not Corresponding Properties, then the inheritance of 50pt. you gave in your example would not occur. IMO, if start-indent and margin-left were actually intended to be Corresponding Properties, the former would have been named margin-start. Also, margin-before and margin-after (or before-indent and after-indent) corresponding properties would also have been created. The description of Corresponding Properties, 2nd para of 5.1.2, is unfortunately vague about which properties are actually CP's. Glen --- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I was probably not 100% correct in my explanation though my interpretation still stands. On 15.02.2005 18:02:14 Glen Mazza wrote: Oh--5.3.2 says: There are two more properties, end-indent and start-indent (block-level formatting objects) which correspond to the various absolute margin properties. I'm uncertain that that means that they are Corresponding Properties however--I wonder if you are reading too much into the word correspond. Jeremias Maerki
Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?
In mid January Peter helped me understand what's going on. Please have a look at his explanation [1]. Maybe that makes it clearer. The margin properties are never used directly in the layout engine (I think and hope). I'm always working from *-indent and space-*. I think it's obvious enough from 5.3.2 that *-indent and margin are meant to be corresponding, at least through the rules established therein. Actually, I think 5.1.2 is the section I should have looked at before Peter pointed out my mistake. About corresponding properties it says The simplest example of such properties..., so in my view 5.3.2 describes a complex relationship and so my calling these properties corresponding was really correct. And the rules in 5.3.2 talk about corresponding (margin-corresponding), and to what can they correspond to if not start-indent and end-indent or space-before and space-after depending on the writing mode? If you think the current interpretation is wrong, please present your theory. However, the more I think about this, and the more I'm explaining, the more I can say that I'm sure that the interpretation is correct. [1] http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]msgId=2078791 On 15.02.2005 18:27:38 Glen Mazza wrote: But if start-indent and margin-left are not Corresponding Properties, then the inheritance of 50pt. you gave in your example would not occur. IMO, if start-indent and margin-left were actually intended to be Corresponding Properties, the former would have been named margin-start. Also, margin-before and margin-after (or before-indent and after-indent) corresponding properties would also have been created. The description of Corresponding Properties, 2nd para of 5.1.2, is unfortunately vague about which properties are actually CP's. Jeremias Maerki
Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?
Jeremias, I am wrong here. This phrase in 5.3.2: If the corresponding absolute margin property is specified on the formatting object... Clearly means that margin *is* a CP, and hence is a CP with start-indent/end-indent as appropriate. Forget that argument--never mind, and I'm sorry that you had to waste time explaining this to me. I may have more questions on your logic though, as I'm studying your original response to Luca. But thankfully we're in agreement on this point. Thanks, Glen --- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In mid January Peter helped me understand what's going on. Please have a look at his explanation [1]. Maybe that makes it clearer. The margin properties are never used directly in the layout engine (I think and hope). I'm always working from *-indent and space-*. I think it's obvious enough from 5.3.2 that *-indent and margin are meant to be corresponding, at least through the rules established therein. Actually, I think 5.1.2 is the section I should have looked at before Peter pointed out my mistake. About corresponding properties it says The simplest example of such properties..., so in my view 5.3.2 describes a complex relationship and so my calling these properties corresponding was really correct. And the rules in 5.3.2 talk about corresponding (margin-corresponding), and to what can they correspond to if not start-indent and end-indent or space-before and space-after depending on the writing mode? If you think the current interpretation is wrong, please present your theory. However, the more I think about this, and the more I'm explaining, the more I can say that I'm sure that the interpretation is correct. [1] http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]msgId=2078791
Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Luca, the reason for the effect you're seeing is the inheritance of start-indent and end-indent. In your exapmle, if you specify a margin-left and margin-right on the simple-page-master, (margin-left and margin-right of 50pt each on fo:s-p-m) this results (corresponding properties) in a start-indent and end-indent of 50pt each. via the second set of formulas, because margins are explicitly specified and fo:s-p-m does not generate any area and hence does not generate a reference area (although it is used by fo:page-sequence to do so): I agree here. Now, because start|end-indent are inherited, region-body also starts with a start-indent and end-indent of 50pt which I agree, but these properties are not explicitly specified on fo:region-body, so the first two sets of formulae are not relevant here. Nor would they be anyway because I don't believe fo:region-bodies generate reference areas. together with the parent's start-indent accumulates 100pt because each of the FOs are generating a reference area. I don't think so here--I don't believe either fo:s-p-m or fo:region-body generate reference areas--indeed, I don't think anything located outside of fo:page-sequence does. The spec says they are *used* to create a reference area, but they don't generate one themselves. So maybe your calculations here may need changing--because different formulae in 5.3.2 would hence be activated. Section 6.1 [1] says There are three kinds of formatting objects: (1) those that generate areas, (2) those that return areas, but do not generate them, and (3) those that are used in the generation of areas. fo:s-p-m and fo:region-body are type (3), not type (1). fo:s-p-m text: The fo:simple-page-master formatting object generates no area directly. It is used in the generation of pages by an fo:page-sequence. type (3) fo:r-b text: The fo:region-body formatting object is used to generate one region-viewport-area and one region-reference-area whenever an fo:simple-page-master that has an fo:region-body as a child is used to generate a page. (i.e., type 3) [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/slice6.html#fo-section So in your case you could specify a margin=0pt on the region-body which triggers the first formula given in 5.3.2. Again, I don't think so because fo:region-body never generates a reference-area. Hence, with no explicit specification of margin properites, the third set of formulas then activates: margin-corresponding = start-indent - inherited_value_of(start-indent) - padding-corresponding - border-corresponding-width with the additional rule that: If the start-indent or end-indent properties are not specified their inherited value is used in these formulae. Since start-indent and end-indent were not specified, then we have: margin-corresponding = inherited_value_of(start-indent) - inherited_value_of(start-indent) - padding-corresponding - border-corresponding-width, or zero for the margin properties on fo:region-body. (i.e., we just rely on the 50pt. on simple-page-master.) So Luca is correct that both fo:simple-page-masters should generate the same overall margins of 50 pt. each, no? Thanks, Glen
Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?
On second thought, Jeremias, instead of arguing this, why don't we just compromise at 75pt. margins? ;) Glen --- Glen Mazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Luca, the reason for the effect you're seeing is the inheritance of start-indent and end-indent. In your exapmle, if you specify a margin-left and margin-right on the simple-page-master, (margin-left and margin-right of 50pt each on fo:s-p-m) this results (corresponding properties) in a start-indent and end-indent of 50pt each. via the second set of formulas, because margins are explicitly specified and fo:s-p-m does not generate any area and hence does not generate a reference area (although it is used by fo:page-sequence to do so): I agree here. Now, because start|end-indent are inherited, region-body also starts with a start-indent and end-indent of 50pt which I agree, but these properties are not explicitly specified on fo:region-body, so the first two sets of formulae are not relevant here. Nor would they be anyway because I don't believe fo:region-bodies generate reference areas. together with the parent's start-indent accumulates 100pt because each of the FOs are generating a reference area. I don't think so here--I don't believe either fo:s-p-m or fo:region-body generate reference areas--indeed, I don't think anything located outside of fo:page-sequence does. The spec says they are *used* to create a reference area, but they don't generate one themselves. So maybe your calculations here may need changing--because different formulae in 5.3.2 would hence be activated. Section 6.1 [1] says There are three kinds of formatting objects: (1) those that generate areas, (2) those that return areas, but do not generate them, and (3) those that are used in the generation of areas. fo:s-p-m and fo:region-body are type (3), not type (1). fo:s-p-m text: The fo:simple-page-master formatting object generates no area directly. It is used in the generation of pages by an fo:page-sequence. type (3) fo:r-b text: The fo:region-body formatting object is used to generate one region-viewport-area and one region-reference-area whenever an fo:simple-page-master that has an fo:region-body as a child is used to generate a page. (i.e., type 3) [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/slice6.html#fo-section So in your case you could specify a margin=0pt on the region-body which triggers the first formula given in 5.3.2. Again, I don't think so because fo:region-body never generates a reference-area. Hence, with no explicit specification of margin properites, the third set of formulas then activates: margin-corresponding = start-indent - inherited_value_of(start-indent) - padding-corresponding - border-corresponding-width with the additional rule that: If the start-indent or end-indent properties are not specified their inherited value is used in these formulae. Since start-indent and end-indent were not specified, then we have: margin-corresponding = inherited_value_of(start-indent) - inherited_value_of(start-indent) - padding-corresponding - border-corresponding-width, or zero for the margin properties on fo:region-body. (i.e., we just rely on the 50pt. on simple-page-master.) So Luca is correct that both fo:simple-page-masters should generate the same overall margins of 50 pt. each, no? Thanks, Glen
Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?
90pt, no less. On 16.02.2005 05:15:36 Glen Mazza wrote: On second thought, Jeremias, instead of arguing this, why don't we just compromise at 75pt. margins? ;) Jeremias Maerki
Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?
I'm afraid that you're wrong here. It's true that s-p-m and region-body don't directly generate reference areas but they also can't, because they are only used as a template for each new page. For for each page they serve as FOs that generate reference areas. But let me give you another example where this is clearer and so you see that your argument doesn't really count in this discussion. Please open test/layoutengine/testcases/block-container3.xml. That test case I wrote specifically to demostrate the effect we're discussing here. You can't deny that block-container generates a reference area directly. So in this test case the block inside the b-c has an effective start-indent of 20pt (10pt + 10pt) much like in Luca's example. If you look at the checks at the end of block-container3.xml you will realize that there is no 2 (millipoints) anywhere. It's simply the effect from the reference area which results in the double indent. So if you wanted to have both text-generating blocks left-aligned at the same position you'd have to specify start-indent=0pt on the block-container or on its nested block to reset the start-indent to 0pt. BTW, I anticipated that I'd have this argument sooner or later. I was rather baffled when I found out how it is supposed to work. So don't worry about wasting my time in this case. I simply hope we can then put it to rest once and for all, ideally documented in a nice Wiki or Web page, so that if that question comes up again, we can simply point people to that page. (additional comments inline) On 16.02.2005 05:02:30 Glen Mazza wrote: snip/ together with the parent's start-indent accumulates 100pt because each of the FOs are generating a reference area. I don't think so here--I don't believe either fo:s-p-m or fo:region-body generate reference areas--indeed, I don't think anything located outside of fo:page-sequence does. The spec says they are *used* to create a reference area, but they don't generate one themselves. So maybe your calculations here may need changing--because different formulae in 5.3.2 would hence be activated. Section 6.1 [1] says There are three kinds of formatting objects: (1) those that generate areas, (2) those that return areas, but do not generate them, and (3) those that are used in the generation of areas. fo:s-p-m and fo:region-body are type (3), not type (1). fo:s-p-m text: The fo:simple-page-master formatting object generates no area directly. It is used in the generation of pages by an fo:page-sequence. type (3) fo:r-b text: The fo:region-body formatting object is used to generate one region-viewport-area and one region-reference-area whenever an fo:simple-page-master that has an fo:region-body as a child is used to generate a page. (i.e., type 3) [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/slice6.html#fo-section So in your case you could specify a margin=0pt on the region-body which triggers the first formula given in 5.3.2. Again, I don't think so because fo:region-body never generates a reference-area. Hence, with no explicit specification of margin properites, the third set of formulas then activates: margin-corresponding = start-indent - inherited_value_of(start-indent) - padding-corresponding - border-corresponding-width with the additional rule that: If the start-indent or end-indent properties are not specified their inherited value is used in these formulae. Since start-indent and end-indent were not specified, then we have: margin-corresponding = inherited_value_of(start-indent) - inherited_value_of(start-indent) - padding-corresponding - border-corresponding-width, This formula is only used to calculate margin-corresponding. It is not used to calculate the effective indent. Corresponding properties should not be used directly to do the actual calculations that define the layout. Ask yourself: How would you decide when to use what property to calculate the actual indents? That's why the formulas are there to derive start|end-indent from the corresponding properties. The formula you're refferring to here is actually used inside IndentPropertyMaker. It is used to create the margin-corresponding value which is used in the formula sets 1 and 2. or zero for the margin properties on fo:region-body. (i.e., we just rely on the 50pt. on simple-page-master.) So Luca is correct that both fo:simple-page-masters should generate the same overall margins of 50 pt. each, no? No. :-) Jeremias Maerki
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31063] New: - id already in this document error with no duplicate id
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31063. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31063 id already in this document error with no duplicate id Summary: id already in this document error with no duplicate id Product: Fop Version: 0.20.5 Platform: PC URL: http://tigreraye.org/essai.fo http://tigreraye.org/essai.xml OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: general AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FOP to produce PDF or PS documents (from a DocBook XML source converted to FO). For some specific documents, I always end up with the following error: [ERROR] file:/home/fevrier/essai.fo:48:206 The id id2455426 already exists in this document I tried to build the FO file with both xsltproc and xalan, with the same result each time. The attached files are the minimal DocBook XML file I was able to make that exhibit this issue and the corresponding FO file. I am able to work around this issue by adding a blank paragraph (or two) before the page break solve this issue. It would seem that this problem happens when a QANDASET (DocBook XML) is over a page border. However, since fop complains about a duplicate id in the file, and no id is duplicated in the FO file, it would seem to be a FOP issue. Thanks.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31063] - id already in this document error with no duplicate id
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31063. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31063 id already in this document error with no duplicate id [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added URL|http://tigreraye.org/essai.f|http://tigreraye.org/essai.f |o |o |http://tigreraye.org/essai.x| |ml | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-05 18:24 --- The DocBook XML file is available here: http://tigreraye.org/essai.xml
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31063] - id already in this document error with no duplicate id
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31063. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31063 id already in this document error with no duplicate id [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-05 19:33 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 14962 ***
XMLParser error with unicode characters in XML file.
I am getting a XML parsing error from weblogic.apache.xerces when I parse a XML document which contains accented characters. This is what I am doing 1) Some database columns have accented data for spanish,japanese etc languages like Nmero de identificao: and nmero de identificacin. 2) I am reading this data and creating a XML file using some processing and then writing the file on the disc using weblogic.xml.stream.XMLOutputStream flush() method. 3) Then I am using FOP to render this XML in PDF. In the rendering process the weblogic.apache.xerces.XMLparser gets called to parse the XML. Here the parser throws a org.xml.sax.SAXParserException ( An invalid XML character (Unicode: 0xfa) was found in the element content of the document). I was under the impression that XMLParser should take care of the accented characters. When I open the XML file which I created in XML SPY I see box characters like cliente n de identificaci. Please let me know how should i handle my code here. Thanks Manoj Thanks
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29459] - Error in processing xml-file with xsl-stylesheet
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29459. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29459 Error in processing xml-file with xsl-stylesheet [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|general |pdf renderer
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29459] New: - Error in processing xml-file with xsl-stylesheet
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29459. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29459 Error in processing xml-file with xsl-stylesheet Summary: Error in processing xml-file with xsl-stylesheet Product: Fop Version: 0.20.5 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT/2K Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: general AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] If I run fop with: fop.bat -xml daten.xml -xsl daten.xsl daten.pdf I got the error: [ERROR] org.apache.fop.apps.FOPException: A table cell must be child of fo:table-row, not fo:table-body I chekc th fo-output with xalan.bat and all looks fine. If I run fop with: fop.bat xalanout.fo daten.pdf it works. I assume the probleme is located in the following codesnip: xsl:if test=position() mod 2 xsl:text disable-output-escaping=yeslt;fo:table-row height=quot;14cmquot; gt; /xsl:text /xsl:if xsl:call-template name=RezeptCell/ xsl:if test=not(position() mod 2) xsl:text disable-output-escaping=yeslt;/fo:table-rowgt; /xsl:text /xsl:if xsl:if test=position()=last() and position() mod 2 xsl:text disable-output-escaping=yeslt;/fo:table-rowgt; /xsl:text /xsl:if
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29459] - Error in processing xml-file with xsl-stylesheet
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29459. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29459 Error in processing xml-file with xsl-stylesheet [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-09 13:16 --- This is *not* a bug. It is not valid to generate the start tag in one template and the end tag in another template. If this becomes necessary to achieve what you want then you need to re-think your XSL stylesheet design. Using xsl:text with disable-output-escaping=yes is a trick that only works when the result of the XSL tranform is serialized to disk. When you supply xsl and xml files as input to the command line, the transform result is not serialized but rather passed as SAX events to FOP. Hence your trick fails. If you are having difficulties then you should ask on the fop-user mailing list before raising a bug.
Database #Error
-- Partial message is available! -- Error: llegal signs in Mail-Routing -- Mail Server: ESMTP VX32.9 Version Betha Alpha Norton AntiVirus gelöscht1.txt Description: plain/text
Re: Compile error in HEAD
Glen, On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 01:54:35PM -0800, Glen Mazza wrote: Simon, I can't duplicate the problem on my machine but I think I see the issue: there is *no* more org.apache.fop.fo.properties.Constants interface anymore, it's been gone for a month or so. I think you just need to clear it out (delete the file), and make sure you have the newest build.xml--it is the script that formerly created that properties.Constants interface (but doesn't anymore). What I do before a full build is delete the BUILD directory, then type ant--this forces everything to be created from scratch. That solves the problem. I usually do an incremental build with 'ant compile'. This is the second time I have been bitten by the fact that that is not always sufficient. What seems to have happened is this: The incremental build does not remove the files fo.Constants.java/class and fo.properties.Constants.java/class as previously generated from codegen. The former of these causes ant not to rebuild the class fo.Constants from the corresponding new code in src, thus leaving out the new constants that were declared in the latter. Thanks, Simon -- Simon Pepping email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl public key: http://www.leverkruid.nl/personal/sp.asc fingerprint: E3BF 7295 9AA8 8B8A C01A 219D FAAC 088C 6B28 F549
Compile error in HEAD
Hi, The code that I checked out this evening from CVS HEAD generates compile errors, for example, [javac] /fsd/source/xml-fop/build/gensrc/org/apache/fop/fo/properties/BorderBottomStyleMaker.java:21: cannot resolve symbol [javac] symbol : variable PR_BORDER_AFTER_STYLE [javac] location: interface org.apache.fop.fo.properties.Constants [javac] p= propertyList.getExplicitOrShorthand(propertyList.wmMap(Constants.PR_BORDER_AFTER_STYLE, Constants.PR_BORDER_AFTER_STYLE, Constants.PR_BORDER_END_STYLE)); [javac] ^ The cause is that the import section is not sufficient: package org.apache.fop.fo.properties; import org.apache.fop.fo.*; import org.apache.fop.apps.FOPException; With these import statements the compiler applies interface org.apache.fop.fo.properties.Constants instead of interface org.apache.fop.fo.Constants. An explicit statement import org.apache.fop.fo.Constants; should be added. I did it as follows: --- properties.xsl.~1.30.~ Sat Jan 10 20:02:04 2004 +++ properties.xsl Sat Jan 10 21:53:43 2004 @@ -329,7 +329,8 @@ import org.apache.fop.datatypes.*;/xsl:text /xsl:if xsl:text -import org.apache.fop.fo.*;/xsl:text +import org.apache.fop.fo.*; +import org.apache.fop.fo.Constants;/xsl:text xsl:if test=not( (./datatype and ./datatype[. ='List']) or ./class-name[.='GenericCondPadding'] @@ -338,10 +339,6 @@ xsl:text import org.apache.fop.apps.FOPException;/xsl:text /xsl:if - xsl:if test=.//enumeration and @type='generic' -xsl:text -import org.apache.fop.fo.Constants;/xsl:text -/xsl:if xsl:text public class /xsl:text The old code applies a precise test for the inclusion of the import statement. My change includes the import statement in all property makers. Not sure what a more precise test would look like, and if there can be any. Regards, Simon -- Simon Pepping email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl public key: http://www.leverkruid.nl/personal/sp.asc fingerprint: E3BF 7295 9AA8 8B8A C01A 219D FAAC 088C 6B28 F549
Re: Compile error in HEAD
--- Simon Pepping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The cause is that the import section is not sufficient: package org.apache.fop.fo.properties; import org.apache.fop.fo.*; import org.apache.fop.apps.FOPException; With these import statements the compiler applies interface org.apache.fop.fo.properties.Constants instead of interface org.apache.fop.fo.Constants. Simon, I can't duplicate the problem on my machine but I think I see the issue: there is *no* more org.apache.fop.fo.properties.Constants interface anymore, it's been gone for a month or so. I think you just need to clear it out (delete the file), and make sure you have the newest build.xml--it is the script that formerly created that properties.Constants interface (but doesn't anymore). What I do before a full build is delete the BUILD directory, then type ant--this forces everything to be created from scratch. Another note: cvs update -dPC will overwrite and replace your work (actually, moves them to other files), but should remove unneeded files and also get you in sync with HEAD completely. An explicit statement import org.apache.fop.fo.Constants; should be added. I did it as follows: Yes, but the Eclipse warnings of unneeded imports drives Peter West and a few others crazy. If the above does not work, our only other solution would be a fully qualified import statement. Thanks always! Glen __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
Re: Compile error in HEAD
--- Glen Mazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, but the Eclipse warnings of unneeded imports drives Peter West and a few others crazy. If the above does not work, our only other solution would be a fully qualified import statement. oops...I mean fully qualifying the Constants variables. Glen __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
Error in junit tests (was: [Bug 25828] - [PATCH] fop.sh/bat should use java.endorsed.dirs)
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 10:59:54PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25828 [PATCH] fop.sh/bat should use java.endorsed.dirs --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-02 22:59 --- Q I found today that the JUnit tests run well with the jar files from the SDK, but I have problems when I substitute newer jar files for them. This makes me hesitate about my patch. /Q I'm assuming you mean newer JARs but *not* the ones we distribute? If newer versions than ours create errors not found in our supplied versions, rather than hesitate this might actually strengthen the argument for applying your patch! I did the junit tests with various combinations of xercesImpl.jar, xml-apis.jar, xalan.jar. These cause various errors. Most of them may be ascribed to incompatible combinations of versions of these three jar files. I paid special attention to the jar files that come with SDK 1.4.2_01, those that come with FOP CVS HEAD and those that come with Xalan 2.5.2; these should be compatible combinations. No error occurs with the jar files from the SDK. One error occurs with each of the other two combinations. In both cases the error occurs in: [junit] TEST org.apache.fop.BasicDriverTestSuite FAILED and is similar (line numbers differ). Below an extract from the test report for FOP's jar files: Testsuite: org.apache.fop.BasicDriverTestSuite Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 10.26 sec Testcase: testFO2PDFWithDOM took 0.696 sec Caused an ERROR org.w3c.dom.DOMException: NAMESPACE_ERR: An attempt is made to create or change an object in a way which is incorrect with regard to namespaces. javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: org.w3c.dom.DOMException: NAMESPACE_ERR: An attempt is made to create or change an object in a way which is incorrect with regard to namespaces. at org.apache.xalan.transformer.TransformerIdentityImpl.transform(TransformerIdentityImpl.java:469) at org.apache.fop.BasicDriverTestCase.loadDocument(BasicDriverTestCase.java:133) at org.apache.fop.BasicDriverTestCase.testFO2PDFWithDOM(BasicDriverTestCase.java:149) ... Caused by: org.w3c.dom.DOMException: NAMESPACE_ERR: An attempt is made to create or change an object in a way which is incorrect with regard to namespaces. at org.apache.xml.utils.DOMBuilder.startElement(DOMBuilder.java:351) at org.apache.xalan.transformer.TransformerIdentityImpl.startElement(TransformerIdentityImpl.java:1020) org.w3c.dom.DOMException: NAMESPACE_ERR: An attempt is made to create or change an object in a way which is incorrect with regard to namespaces. at org.apache.xml.utils.DOMBuilder.startElement(DOMBuilder.java:351) at org.apache.xalan.transformer.TransformerIdentityImpl.startElement(TransformerIdentityImpl.java:1020) ... org.w3c.dom.DOMException: NAMESPACE_ERR: An attempt is made to create or change an object in a way which is incorrect with regard to namespaces. at org.apache.xerces.dom.CoreDocumentImpl.checkDOMNSErr(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.dom.AttrNSImpl.setName(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.dom.AttrNSImpl.init(Unknown Source) Regards, Simon -- Simon Pepping email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl public key: http://www.leverkruid.nl/personal/sp.asc fingerprint: E3BF 7295 9AA8 8B8A C01A 219D FAAC 088C 6B28 F549
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16713] - Hyphenation error in tables
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16713. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16713 Hyphenation error in tables --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-21 19:01 --- The attachments require other files which are not attached: three xsl files and an external graphic.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16626] - Hyphenation causing java.io.IOException error
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16626. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16626 Hyphenation causing java.io.IOException error [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-15 22:41 --- We will not get this fixed for the maintenance branch, however a fix on this problem was applied to development so this should not occur in our next release. Thanks, Glen *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25512 ***
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25411] New: - [WARNING] Error while constructing image from XML -- throws IOE
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25411. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25411 [WARNING] Error while constructing image from XML -- throws IOE Summary: [WARNING] Error while constructing image from XML -- throws IOE Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: general AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Formatting test/resources/fop/image/errors.fo using command-line Fop encounters an error, then throws an IOException and produces a stack trace followed by more of the error. Shouldn't we skip the Exception.printStackTrace() where the root cause is well-understood and handled by the program ? Command to cause this problem: == java -Xms100m -Xmx200m -cp .:build/fop.jar:lib/avalon-framework-4.1.4.jar:lib/batik.jar:lib/commons-io-dev-20030703.jar org.apache.fop.apps.Fop -fo test/resources/fop/image/errors.fo -pdf /tmp/12610.pdf [INFO] 1.0dev [WARNING] Error while constructing image from XML java.io.IOException: Stream closed ... stack trace deleted ... [ERROR] No ImageReader for this type of image (file:corrupt.svg) ... more stack trace deleted ... the same error is repeated (I think),
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25411] - [WARNING] Error while constructing image from XML -- throws IOE
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25411. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25411 [WARNING] Error while constructing image from XML -- throws IOE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-10 17:24 --- Created an attachment (id=9499) Log of messages including the error and stack trace
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19851] - Error while opening the distribution file
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19851. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19851 Error while opening the distribution file [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-27 23:39 --- fop-0.20.5rc2-bin.tar.gz isn't there anymore (and wasn't broken anyway) Besides, FOP 0.20.5 is also available as ZIP.
Re: Break-before ERROR
Alberto Rodriguez Reyes wrote: the break-before=even-page doesn't work if last page it's even page and i put this label in fo:table into fo:static-content flow-name=xsl-region-before. If last page it's odd page then insert a blank page--- it's work Break-before shouldn't work in static content at all, it only works in the flow. Surely you mean something else? J.Pietschmann
OutOfMemory error
Hi, my name is Alberto and i'm from spain, my english is not very well but i try to tell you what it happens. I'm developed a single system fop based: i received a xml input and a pdf is returned, but if xml is very large the application return a OutOfMemory error. I tried to modify JVM's memory and it's run, but I think that it is not the best solution. Is there any other solution for this? Thank's *** ** Alberto Rodríguez Reyes *** ***
Re: OutOfMemory error
From: Alberto Rodriguez Reyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, my name is Alberto and i'm from spain, my english is not very well but i try to tell you what it happens. I'm developed a single system fop based: i received a xml input and a pdf is returned, but if xml is very large the application return a OutOfMemory error. I tried to modify JVM's memory and it's run, but I think that it is not the best solution. Is there any other solution for this? Thank's Have you read the following advice regarding FOP memory usage on the web site? http://xml.apache.org/fop/running.html#memory A polite request: Please post questions on using FOP to the FOP-User list. The fop-dev list is a development forum. Thanks, Chris _ Tired of 56k? Get a FREE BT Broadband connection http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/btbroadband
RE: OutOfMemory error
Hi, i've read this document and that's only really solution.i think that must have other solution to free memory. Thanks -Mensaje original- De: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: viernes, 26 de septiembre de 2003 11:08 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: OutOfMemory error From: Alberto Rodriguez Reyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, my name is Alberto and i'm from spain, my english is not very well but i try to tell you what it happens. I'm developed a single system fop based: i received a xml input and a pdf is returned, but if xml is very large the application return a OutOfMemory error. I tried to modify JVM's memory and it's run, but I think that it is not the best solution. Is there any other solution for this? Thank's Have you read the following advice regarding FOP memory usage on the web site? http://xml.apache.org/fop/running.html#memory A polite request: Please post questions on using FOP to the FOP-User list. The fop-dev list is a development forum. Thanks, Chris _ Tired of 56k? Get a FREE BT Broadband connection http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/btbroadband
RE: OutOfMemory error
From: Alberto Rodriguez Reyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, i've read this document and that's only really solution.i think that must have other solution to free memory. Thanks I dont quite understand, increasing the amount of memory available to the JVM is the not the only solution suggested on the FOP web site. One other method is to break up your document into multiple page-sequences. Are you saying it is not possible to break up your XSL-FO into multiple page-sequences? If not then explain why you think so, and maybe show us a small example of your XSL-FO. Chris _ Hotmail messages direct to your mobile phone http://www.msn.co.uk/msnmobile
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23256] - Page reference bug - id repeat error.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23256. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23256 Page reference bug - id repeat error. [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-18 21:52 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3497 ***
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3497] - id already exists error when using span=all attribute
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3497. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3497 id already exists error when using span=all attribute [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-18 21:52 --- *** Bug 23256 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3497] - id already exists error when using span=all attribute
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3497. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3497 id already exists error when using span=all attribute --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-11 19:56 --- Created an attachment (id=8169) Updated patch for FOP 0.20.5
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3497] - id already exists error when using span=all attribute
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3497. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3497 id already exists error when using span=all attribute --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-11 19:58 --- I have attached an updated version of the patch for 0.20.5. Is there a reason this patch hasn’t made it into the main releases? It seems to, at least partly, solve a quite major bug.
Re: FOP error log idea
May be a good idea. Xalan has something similar (it's the only other class in the package that has its main Process class, I believe.) Glen --- Clay Leeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would it be possible and/or would it make sense to output the following information at the top of the ERROR/Log? - fop version - jdk version - platform on which error occurred (or where FOP is being run) I don't know if there's any other information (total RAM; RAM in use by FOP/Java, etc.; RAM available; hard drive space available)... Just a thought! Web Maestro Clay - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
FOP error log idea
Would it be possible and/or would it make sense to output the following information at the top of the ERROR/Log? - fop version - jdk version - platform on which error occurred (or where FOP is being run) I don't know if there's any other information (total RAM; RAM in use by FOP/Java, etc.; RAM available; hard drive space available)... Just a thought! Web Maestro Clay - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22216] - bug in processMessage(), doesn't work for ERROR
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216 bug in processMessage(), doesn't work for ERROR --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-08 11:14 --- A 2nd solution is to stop the processing. This may be more useful in many cases. I changed org.apache.fop.fo.flow.ExternalGraphic.layout(): ... catch (MalformedURLException urlex) { // bad URL log.error(Error while creating area : + urlex.getMessage()); throw new FOPException (Error while creating area : + urlex.getMessage()); } catch (FopImageException imgex) { // image error log.error(Error while creating area : + imgex.getMessage()); throw new FOPException (Error while creating area : + imgex.getMessage()); } ... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22216] New: - bug in processMessage(), doesn't work for ERROR
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216 bug in processMessage(), doesn't work for ERROR Summary: bug in processMessage(), doesn't work for ERROR Product: Fop Version: 0.20.5 Platform: PC OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: Other Component: images AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] processMessage() retrieves no information about errors when images, that are included within the xsl, are missing. This error is serious, because it is not possible to implement an own logger (extending log4j logger) that overwrites the error()-method. We need the information when pictures are missing. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22216] - bug in processMessage(), doesn't work for ERROR
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216 bug in processMessage(), doesn't work for ERROR --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-08 08:41 --- An idea to solve the problem: Put some additional actions into the contructors of class FopImageException, like this: public class FopImageException extends Exception { public FopImageException() { super(); // JUN 2003-08-08 -- appended lines MessageHandler.error(No message text available. + this.getMessage()); // JUN 2003-08-08 } public FopImageException(String message) { super(message); // JUN 2003-08-08 -- appended lines MessageHandler.error(message); // JUN 2003-08-08 } } - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22101] New: - linearGradient render error
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22101. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22101 linearGradient render error Summary: linearGradient render error Product: Fop Version: 0.20.5 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT/2K Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: pdf renderer AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The error described in bug 2909 still exists in FOP 0.20.5. Any idea when this issue will be solved? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22101] - linearGradient render error
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22101. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22101 linearGradient render error [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-04 08:32 --- This will be solved with the redesign. Progress is slow though, want to lend a hand? Anyway, please don't use Bugzilla to ask questions, use the mailing lists. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 2909 *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2909] - Gradient render error
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2909. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2909 Gradient render error [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-04 08:32 --- *** Bug 22101 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21946] - [ERROR] svg graphic could not be built: null when running fop embedded
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21946. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21946 [ERROR] svg graphic could not be built: null when running fop embedded --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-29 12:28 --- Please upgrade to FOP 0.20.5 and use the Batik version that comes with FOP. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21946] New: - [ERROR] svg graphic could not be built: null when running fop embedded
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21946. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21946 [ERROR] svg graphic could not be built: null when running fop embedded Summary: [ERROR] svg graphic could not be built: null when running fop embedded Product: Fop Version: 0.20.4 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: Other Component: svg AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am having a big problem with fop when trying to use the code below. Whenever I run it with this code, I get the exceptions listed at the bottom of the message. Whenever I run it with the commented code instead (using Fop.main), it runs fine. I figured the problem is because my svg has references such as 'url(#clipPath2)' inside, and the way I am running below is not allowing fop to resolve these uri's properly, or not finding the path to the input source either. Is there something I am missing? Thanks, Igor. /** * Creates the final pdf document * @throws Exception in case something goes wrong */ protected void createPDF() throws Exception { Logger logger = new ConsoleLogger(ConsoleLogger.LEVEL_INFO); org.apache.fop.messaging.MessageHandler.setScreenLogger(logger); InputHandler inputHandler = new FOInputHandler( new File( fTempOut.getAbsolutePath() ) ); XMLReader parser = inputHandler.getParser(); Driver driver = new Driver(); driver.setLogger(logger); driver.setRenderer(Driver.RENDER_PDF); driver.setErrorDump(true); driver.setOutputStream( osDest ); driver.render( parser, inputHandler.getInputSource() ); /* String args[] = new String[4]; args[0] = -fo; args[1] = fTempOut.getAbsolutePath(); args[2] = -pdf; args[3] = /tmp/test.pdf; org.apache.fop.apps.Fop.main( args );*/ } Error dump: [INFO] building formatting object tree [INFO] [1] [INFO] [2] [INFO] [3] [INFO] [4] [INFO] [5] [ERROR] svg graphic could not be built: null java.lang.NullPointerException at java.net.URL.init(URL.java:328) at java.net.URL.init(URL.java:253) at java.net.URL.init(URL.java:276) at org.apache.batik.util.ParsedURLData.buildURL(Unknown Source) at org.apache.batik.util.ParsedURLData.openStreamInternal(Unknown Source) at org.apache.batik.util.ParsedURLData.openStream(Unknown Source) at org.apache.batik.util.ParsedURL.openStream(Unknown Source) at org.apache.batik.dom.svg.SAXSVGDocumentFactory.createDocument(Unknown Source) at org.apache.batik.bridge.DocumentLoader.loadDocument(Unknown Source) at org.apache.batik.bridge.URIResolver.getNode(Unknown Source) at org.apache.batik.bridge.URIResolver.getElement(Unknown Source) at org.apache.batik.bridge.BridgeContext.getReferencedElement(Unknown Source) at org.apache.batik.bridge.CSSUtilities.convertClipPath(Unknown Source) at org.apache.batik.bridge.AbstractGraphicsNodeBridge.buildGraphicsNode(Unknown Source) ... a lot more exceptions - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21946] - [ERROR] svg graphic could not be built: null when running fop embedded
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21946. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21946 [ERROR] svg graphic could not be built: null when running fop embedded [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-29 03:16 --- Usually best to post to FOP-USER ML first, for guidance, and then submit as a bug only when it's apparent the error is with FOP. That will give you the widest possible help for your issue. It's certainly possible, but less likely FOP is in error, given that the command line option works and what you're trying to do is quite common. Offhand, your declaration of inputHandler to be of type InputHandler (instead of FOInputHandler), may be a problem. Also, check the examples on the http://xml.apache.org/fop/embedding.html page, there may be simpler ways of doing what you're trying to accomplish. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
error compiling HEAD (need GraphicsConfiguration.java)
I can't compile the CVS - HEAD of FOP. Unless I've gotten something wrong, this file: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/svg/PDFGraphicsConfiguration.java?rev=1.1content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup is extending a GraphicsConfiguration.java that apparently needs to be added to CVS. Thanks, Glen __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: error compiling HEAD (need GraphicsConfiguration.java)
Never mind. xml-fop/src/java-1.4 directory needed updating. Had to do a cvs update w/ -d option first. Glen --- Glen Mazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't compile the CVS - HEAD of FOP. Unless I've gotten something wrong, this file: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/svg/PDFGraphicsConfiguration.java?rev=1.1content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup is extending a GraphicsConfiguration.java that apparently needs to be added to CVS. Thanks, Glen __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20621] New: - getting Error while recovering Image Informations exception with nested Stream closed exception
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20621. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20621 getting Error while recovering Image Informations exception with nested Stream closed exception Summary: getting Error while recovering Image Informations exception with nested Stream closed exception Product: Fop Version: 0.20.4 Platform: Other OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: Other Component: images AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We are occasionally generating PDFs that are missing images. It doesn't happen all of the time, and is very difficult to reproduce. Our logs files display the following line: [ERROR] Error while creating area : Error while recovering Image Informations (file:/prod/folio/p1/config/common/img/logo_big.jpg) : Stream closed The file does exist (and has the necessary file permissions), and most of the time it is included on in the PDF without any problems. We generate a large number of PDFs during a batch process when this happens, usually a couple hundred of them. We run 4 threads at once to generate them, all running within a shared weblogic context (version 5.1). I am not sure if this is a threading issue or not. Any ideas how to resolve this? Or at the very least, are there any ways that I can identify when this occurs so that we can at least try and regenerate it (the exception is currently just logged, and the report is generated without any errors being thrown). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20621] - getting Error while recovering Image Informations exception with nested Stream closed exception
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20621. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20621 getting Error while recovering Image Informations exception with nested Stream closed exception [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-09 18:51 --- 0.20.4 was not thread safe in this respect. The current version should be a bit better. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20453] New: - FOP ends with error when xsl:include tag used in xsl
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20453. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20453 FOP ends with error when xsl:include tag used in xsl Summary: FOP ends with error when xsl:include tag used in xsl Product: Fop Version: 0.20.4 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT/2K Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: Other Component: pdf renderer AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] When I put xsl:include href=testinclude.xsl tag in xsl stylesheet, fop ends with following error: [INFO] FOP 0.20.4 [ERROR] null Fop is used from command prompt: fop -xml test.xml -xsl test.xsl -pdf test.pdf I can send complete examples of test.xsd, if needed. ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? xsl:stylesheet version=1.0 xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format; xmlns:nsdc=http://www.rtf2fo.com/NSDC; xmlns:xsl=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform;xsl:template match=nsdc:data fo:root /fo:root /xsl:template xsl:include href=testempty.xsl /xsl:stylesheet - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20453] - FOP ends with error when xsl:include tag used in xsl
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20453. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20453 FOP ends with error when xsl:include tag used in xsl --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-03 15:45 --- Created an attachment (id=6614) Examples of xsd and xsl files used for generating PDF - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20453] - FOP ends with error when xsl:include tag used in xsl
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20453. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20453 FOP ends with error when xsl:include tag used in xsl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-03 16:02 --- This is no FOP problem. Your test.xsl is not well-formed. Change: xsl:include href=testempty.xsl to: xsl:include href=testempty.xsl/ If you run into problems like this, run the XSL transformation alone (without FOP), check for error messages and check if the output from the XSL transformation is the output you expect. More information here: http://xml.apache.org/fop/faq.html#NullPointerException - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20453] New: - FOP ends with error whenxsl:include tag used in xsl
Howdy! On 6/3/2003 8:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [INFO] FOP 0.20.4 [ERROR] null [..] ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? xsl:stylesheet version=1.0 xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format; xmlns:nsdc=http://www.rtf2fo.com/NSDC; xmlns:xsl=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform;xsl:template match=nsdc:data fo:root /fo:root /xsl:template xsl:include href=testempty.xsl /xsl:stylesheet Actually, I believe (respectfully) that the bug is in your XSL. First of all, the xsl:include tag is not closed (although that may be just a typo). 2ndly, according to everywhere I've read, (XML Bible, the XSL spec, etc.): The xsl:include element is only allowed as a top-level element. That means it should be something like this: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? xsl:stylesheet version=1.0 xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format; xmlns:nsdc=http://www.rtf2fo.com/NSDC; xmlns:xsl=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform; xsl:include href=testempty.xsl/ xsl:template match=nsdc:data fo:root /fo:root /xsl:template /xsl:stylesheet Hope this helps! Web Maestro Clay -- Clay Leeds - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Developer - Medata, Inc. - http://www.medata.com PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/cleeds.asc - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20453] New: - FOP ends with error when xsl:include tag used in xsl
Clay, you need to consider that this guy may not see your answer if he isn't subscribed to fop-dev. You need post answers in bugzilla which will automatically send a natification to the reporter. BTW, it's funny. I also wondered if the xsl:include shouldn't be top-level. But after I made his text.xsl well-formed (!) the FO got generated just fine on my machine. Strange. On 03.06.2003 18:02:11 Clay Leeds wrote: snip/ Actually, I believe (respectfully) that the bug is in your XSL. First of all, the xsl:include tag is not closed (although that may be just a typo). 2ndly, according to everywhere I've read, (XML Bible, the XSL spec, etc.): The xsl:include element is only allowed as a top-level element. snip/ Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20453] New: - FOP ends with error whenxsl:include tag used in xsl
Jeremias, Thanks for the note! I'll POST it... BTW... On 6/3/2003 9:09 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: BTW, it's funny. I also wondered if the xsl:include shouldn't be top-level. But after I made his text.xsl well-formed (!) the FO got generated just fine on my machine. Strange. I'm guessing, that it was well-formed however, it probably did not validate... at least not if he used a DTD or proper(?) SCHEMA which had xsl:include in the proper place (at the top level of xsl:stylseheet). [OT] This type of well-formed-ness/valid issue bit me in the rear, as I was under the impression Internet Explorer validated XML files if a DTD were attached. It does *not* (one beta version of 5--or was it 5.5?--did, but they ended up shipping versions of IE 5+ checking only for well-formedness). I ended up getting our programmers (who write the code which output the XML which I apply XSL-FO stylesheets to generate PDF print, etc.) to install XMLValidator on their Windows boxen: http://www.uni-giessen.de/club/misc/xmlvalid101/xmlvalid.html I could've had them use xalan or some other JAVA tool, but opted for this tool as an alternative to my Windows running brethren... -- Clay Leeds - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Developer - Medata, Inc. - http://www.medata.com PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/cleeds.asc - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20453] - FOP ends with error when xsl:include tag used in xsl
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20453. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20453 FOP ends with error when xsl:include tag used in xsl --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-03 18:09 --- Actually, I believe (respectfully) that the bug is in your XSL. First of all, the xsl:include tag is not closed (although that may be just a typo). 2ndly, according to everywhere I've read, (XML Bible, the XSL spec, etc.): The xsl:include element is only allowed as a top-level element. That means it should be something like this: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? xsl:stylesheet version=1.0 xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format; xmlns:nsdc=http://www.rtf2fo.com/NSDC; xmlns:xsl=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform; xsl:include href=testempty.xsl/ xsl:template match=nsdc:data fo:root /fo:root /xsl:template /xsl:stylesheet Hope this helps! Web Maestro Clay - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Error printing from servlet
Hi All, I was using the attached servlet(based in example supplied with FOP) to print some reports. It was running OK with Tomcat, but when i changed my aplication server to Oracle 9IAS, it is not working anymore. The printer is already configured in the server. Does somebodyknow what is the problem? Thanks, Paulo Benfatti The error generated is: 500 Internal Server Errororg.apache.fop.apps.FOPException: Unable to print: java.awt.print.PrinterException: No printer found. at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.render(Driver.java:462) at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.run(Driver.java:524) at FopPrintServlet.renderFO(Unknown Source) at FopPrintServlet.doGet(Unknown Source) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:740) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.ResourceFilterChain.doFilter(ResourceFilterChain.java:65) at oracle.security.jazn.oc4j.JAZNFilter.doFilter(JAZNFilter.java:283) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:560) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:306) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:767) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.AJPRequestHandler.run(AJPRequestHandler.java:148) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.AJPRequestHandler.run(AJPRequestHandler.java:72) at EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.PooledExecutor$Worker.run(PooledExecutor.java:803) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) - java.io.IOException: Unable to print: java.awt.print.PrinterException: No printer found. at org.apache.fop.apps.StreamRenderer.stopRenderer(StreamRenderer.java:157) at org.apache.fop.fo.FOTreeBuilder.endDocument(FOTreeBuilder.java:200) at oracle.xml.parser.v2.NonValidatingParser.parseDocument(NonValidatingParser.java:269) at oracle.xml.parser.v2.XMLParser.parse(XMLParser.java:147) at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.render(Driver.java:457) at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.run(Driver.java:524) at FopPrintServlet.renderFO(Unknown Source) at FopPrintServlet.doGet(Unknown Source) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:740) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.ResourceFilterChain.doFilter(ResourceFilterChain.java:65) at oracle.security.jazn.oc4j.JAZNFilter.doFilter(JAZNFilter.java:283) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:560) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:306) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:767) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.AJPRequestHandler.run(AJPRequestHandler.java:148) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.AJPRequestHandler.run(AJPRequestHandler.java:72) at EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.PooledExecutor$Worker.run(PooledExecutor.java:803) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) java.io.IOException: Unable to print: java.awt.print.PrinterException: No printer found. at FopPrintServlet$PrintRenderer.stopRenderer(Unknown Source) at org.apache.fop.apps.StreamRenderer.stopRenderer(StreamRenderer.java:152) at org.apache.fop.fo.FOTreeBuilder.endDocument(FOTreeBuilder.java:200) at oracle.xml.parser.v2.NonValidatingParser.parseDocument(NonValidatingParser.java:269) at oracle.xml.parser.v2.XMLParser.parse(XMLParser.java:147) at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.render(Driver.java:457) at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.run(Driver.java:524) at FopPrintServlet.renderFO(Unknown Source) at FopPrintServlet.doGet(Unknown Source) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:740) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.ResourceFilterChain.doFilter(ResourceFilterChain.java:65) at oracle.security.jazn.oc4j.JAZNFilter.doFilter(JAZNFilter.java:283) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:560) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:306) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:767) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18559] - Not enough error messages (Marformed format string)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18559. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18559 Not enough error messages (Marformed format string) [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-01 11:10 --- This is a Xalan problem. Try running the XSL transformation only (without FOP). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
email virus error
Has anyone ever seen a situation where a pdf created using FOP and xsl:fo is sent in an email directly from Internet Explorer (File - Send - Page by Email), and the recipient gets this email virus warning when they receive the email? Found virus EMail_Flaw_MIME_Tag_Overflow in file The file is deleted. When the pdf is saved locally, then emailed, it works fine. I am using Apache version 0.20.2. Thanks for your help, Mark Drake Principal Financial Group - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18058] New: - Error fetching Image from URL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18058. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18058 Error fetching Image from URL Summary: Error fetching Image from URL Product: Fop Version: 0.20.4 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows NT/2K Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: images AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In our production environment we create images for userdefined advertisements on the fly. The path to the stored images depends on the user input. That means if the user has an order with key: MyOrder#001 the produced image will be stored in ..some_path/MyOrder#001/MyAdPict01.eps If the (relative) path to an Image contains a '#' the Image will not be found due to the URL is constructed in FOPImageFactory (line:111) as followed: new URL( Configuration.getStringValue( baseDir ) + absoluteURL.getFile() ) The URL , created before, has interpreted the content after the '#' as a anchor reference and this information will be lost on constructing the new URL so that the Image will never appear in the output. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wrong operand type error in ASV 3.0
The error still persists even after I changed the width to 1. Swapan. --- Keiron Liddle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: !-- If I remove this line, everything seems to work fine -- svg:line x1=58 y1=179 x2=403 y2=179 stroke=#00 stroke- width=0.5 / IIRC It is probably an error caused by this line being 0.5 width. In PDF lines can only be whole numbers and it might wrongly be inserting 0.5 in the PDF causing the error. Try making it width 1. If you need a 0.5 width line it can be scaled. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wrong operand type error in ASV 3.0
Hi All, I have written a small svg document and embedding this svg document in an FO document to covert to pdf. I guess the FOP completely depends on batik for SVG2PDF conversion. When I try to open the resulting pdf, it says wrong operand type. Can anybody help ? Thanks in advance, Swapan. ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? fo:root xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format; fo:layout-master-set fo:simple-page-master margin-right=1.5cm margin-left=1.5cm margin-bottom=2cm margin-top=1cm page-width=21cm page-height=29.7cm master-name=first fo:region-body margin-top=0cm margin-bottom=0cm/ fo:region-before extent=0cm/ fo:region-after extent=0cm/ /fo:simple-page-master /fo:layout-master-set fo:page-sequence master-reference=first fo:static-content flow-name=xsl-region-before fo:block line-height=14pt font-size=10pt text-align=endEmbedding SVG examples/fo:block /fo:static-content fo:static-content flow-name=xsl-region-after fo:block line-height=14pt font-size=10pt text-align=endPage fo:page-number//fo:block /fo:static-content fo:flow flow-name=xsl-region-body fo:block fo:instream-foreign-object svg:svg width=16.1925cm height=20.955cm viewBox=0 0 8.5 11 version=1.1 xmlns:svg=http://www.w3.org/2000/svg; svg:g transform=matrix(1 0 0 1 0 0) /svg:g svg:g transform=matrix(0.01041667 0 0 0.01041667 0 0) svg:text x=48 y=108 font-family=Times New Roman font- size=20pt font-weight=bold fill=#00 stroke=none text- anchor=start svg:tspan x=48 y=108 textLength=57 ABC/svg:tspan svg:tspan x=116 y=108 textLength=114 Company/svg:tspan /svg:text svg:text x=628 y=66.53516 font-family=Times New Roman font- size=15.6pt fill=#00 stroke=none text-anchor=start svg:tspan x=628 y=66.53516 O/svg:tspan /svg:text svg:text x=644 y=66.53516 font-family=Times New Roman font- size=12pt fill=#00 stroke=none text-anchor=start svg:tspan x=644 y=66.53516 textLength=107 RGANIZATION/svg:tspan /svg:text !-- If I remove this line, everything seems to work fine -- svg:line x1=58 y1=179 x2=403 y2=179 stroke=#00 stroke- width=0.5 / /svg:g /svg:svg /fo:instream-foreign-object /fo:block /fo:flow /fo:page-sequence /fo:root __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wrong operand type error in ASV 3.0
!-- If I remove this line, everything seems to work fine -- svg:line x1=58 y1=179 x2=403 y2=179 stroke=#00 stroke- width=0.5 / IIRC It is probably an error caused by this line being 0.5 width. In PDF lines can only be whole numbers and it might wrongly be inserting 0.5 in the PDF causing the error. Try making it width 1. If you need a 0.5 width line it can be scaled. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16996] New: - build.bat script fails with javac error.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16996. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16996 build.bat script fails with javac error. Summary: build.bat script fails with javac error. Product: Fop Version: 0.20.4 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT/2K Status: NEW Severity: Blocker Priority: Other Component: general AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Ant build script for FOP 0.20.4 (when run via the provided 'build.bat') file, failed in the compile target with two javac compiler errors. The distribution in question was from http://xml.apache.org/dist/fop/fop-0.20.4- src.tar.gz (i.e the current stable source release). Detail from download page: fop-0.20.4-src.tar.gz 08-Jul-2002 04:52 7.8M FOP downloads The compile problem is that the PDFGraphicsConfiguration class is being instantiated (new) when it is abstract. This in turn seems to be caused by the fact the PDFGraphicsConfiguration is extending GraphicsConfiguration but not implementing createCompatibleVolatileImage(). This is a bit odd, since you'd expect that this is the sort of problem that would prevent the distribution from ever compiling. Surely someone has downloaded and compiled this sucessfully? Thought: could this be a CLASSPATH problem? Maybe with two versions of that class in the build path? (However build.bat seems to configure the CLASSPATH for the build, so this seems unlikely.) Alternatively, is the bundled version of Batik the right one? Ant output shown below (javac errors at bottom): C:\java\fop-0.20.4build.bat Fop Build System Building with classpath c:\java\j2sdk1.4.1\lib\tools.jar;c:\java\j2sdk1.4.1\lib\ classes.zip;lib\ant-1.4.1.jar;lib\batik.jar;lib\buildtools.jar;lib\xercesImpl-2. 0.1.jar;lib\xml-apis.jar;lib\xalan-2.3.1.jar;lib\bsf.jar;lib\jimi-1.0.jar;lib\av alon-framework-cvs-20020315.jar Starting Ant... Buildfile: build.xml init-avail: init-filters-xalan2: init: [echo] --- Fop 0.20.4 [1999-2002] prepare: [echo] Preparing the build directories [mkdir] Created dir: C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\org\apache\fop\fo\properti es [mkdir] Created dir: C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\org\apache\fop\render\pdf\ fonts [mkdir] Created dir: C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\org\apache\fop\svg [mkdir] Created dir: C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\classes\conf [mkdir] Created dir: C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\classes\hyph [copy] Copying 3 files to C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\classes\conf codegen: [echo] Resetting codegen directory [copy] Copying 37 files to C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\codegen [echo] Generating the java files from xml resources [style] Processing C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\codegen\allprops.xml to C:\j ava\fop-0.20.4\build\src\org\apache\fop\fo\properties\Constants.java [style] Loading stylesheet C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\codegen\genconst.xsl [style] Processing C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\codegen\foproperties.xml to C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\org\apache\fop\fo\properties\fo_ignore_this.java [style] Loading stylesheet C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\codegen\properties.x sl [style] Processing C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\codegen\foproperties.xml to C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\org\apache\fop\fo\properties\FOPropertyMapping.java [style] Loading stylesheet C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\codegen\propmap.xsl [style] Processing C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\codegen\foproperties.xml to C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\org\apache\fop\fo\properties\foenums_ignore_this.ja va [style] Loading stylesheet C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\codegen\enumgen.xsl [style] Processing C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\codegen\extproperties.xml to C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\org\apache\fop\fo\properties\ExtensionPropertyMapp ing.java [style] Loading stylesheet C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\codegen\propmap.xsl [style] Processing C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\codegen\encodings.xml to C:\ java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\org\apache\fop\render\pdf\CodePointMapping.java [style] Loading stylesheet C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\codegen\code-point-m apping.xsl [style] Processing C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\codegen\Courier.xml to C:\ja va\fop-0.20.4\build\src\org\apache\fop\render\pdf\fonts\Courier.java [style] Loading stylesheet C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\codegen\font-file.xs l [style] Processing C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\codegen\Courier-Oblique.xml to C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\org\apache\fop\render\pdf\fonts\CourierOblique.j ava [style] Loading stylesheet C:\java\fop-0.20.4\build\src\codegen\font-file.xs l [style] Processing C:\java\fop
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16996] - build.bat script fails with javac error.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16996. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16996 build.bat script fails with javac error. --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-12 14:24 --- Follow-up note: I worked around the problem - at least as far as getting a completed build is concerned - by providing an 'implemention' of this method in org.apache.fop.svg.PDFGraphicsConfiguration. However, I've just made this method return null, so this may cause further problem later. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16996] - build.bat script fails with javac error.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16996. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16996 build.bat script fails with javac error. --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-12 14:56 --- Does not occur with source for fop-0.20.5rc downloaded from previously mentioned distribution page, only fop-0.20.4. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16996] - build.bat script fails with javac error.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16996. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16996 build.bat script fails with javac error. [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-12 14:59 --- This is a problem with JDK 1.4. Please use FOP 0.20.5 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16713] New: - Hyphenation error in tables
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16713. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16713 Hyphenation error in tables Summary: Hyphenation error in tables Product: Fop Version: 0.20.4 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT/2K Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: page-master/layout AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] When using soft-hyphenation in tables in order to fit text in columns, the hyphenation has no effect. Thus resulting in text floating over cells. In general it doesn't seem that there's any handling for text floating over cells. Regards, Mathias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16713] - Hyphenation error in tables
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16713. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16713 Hyphenation error in tables --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-03 15:42 --- Created an attachment (id=4687) Example xml-file - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16713] - Hyphenation error in tables
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16713. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16713 Hyphenation error in tables --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-03 15:44 --- Created an attachment (id=4688) Example xsl-file - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SVG size error in PDFRenderer
Hi, the size of SVG is wrong when rendered by org.apache.fop.render.pdf.PDFRenderer in FOP 0.20.4. The method renderSVGDocument uses BridgeContext.getDocumentSize().getWidth() etc, which returns an integer instead of a float. This works fine when rendering to PostScript but not to PDF. I looked at the FOP 0.20.1 sources (which we're currently using) and there the size was fetched via SVGSVGElement.getWidth().getBaseVal().getValue() and this seem to work fine when used in FOP 0.20.4 after some initial tests. I'm not very familiar with the code so hopefully someone at this list has some good answers to this behaviour. Thanx, Christer. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16626] New: - Hyphenation causing java.io.IOException error
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16626. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16626 Hyphenation causing java.io.IOException error Summary: Hyphenation causing java.io.IOException error Product: Fop Version: 0.20.4 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: pdf renderer AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The behavior of setting hyphenation to true seems a little buggy with double quote character (quot;) fo:block hyphenate=true hyphenation-push-character-count=2 hyphenation- remain-character-count=2 language=envalue/fo:block Problem 1: -- If value is 80070 - CASH:HOTL TRANS/CTM quot;PALMSTAR ROSEquot;, it did hyphenate properly, but put the quote in the wrong place. The value was displayed as 80070 - CASH:HOTL TRANS/CTM PALM- STAR ROSE Notice that the quote has moved to enclose STAR ROSE and not PALMSTAR ROSE. Problem 2: - This is a more serious one as it causes a java.io.IOException Try a value of 80070 - CASH:HOTL TRANS/CTM quot;ASOPOSquot; for a table- cell of width 171pt. It caused the exception, it seems like the no. of chars remaining is 2 or less and it being a quot is problematic. As introducing a few more characters in the above value or taking out the quotes seemed to work fine. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12565] - Embedding SVG tags like font-face causes error message and will be ignored
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12565. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12565 Embedding SVG tags like font-face causes error message and will be ignored [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-01-26 20:34 --- *** Bug 16430 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16318] New: - NoSuchMethod - Error when embedding SVG
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16318. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16318 NoSuchMethod - Error when embedding SVG Summary: NoSuchMethod - Error when embedding SVG Product: Fop Version: 0.20.4 Platform: PC OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: images AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Embedding a simple SVG: fo:block fo:external-graphic src=w:/vw-bank/prj/Onlinekontoauszug/images/Test.svg width=82.6mm height=28.7mm/ /fo:block Test.svg: ?xml version=1.0 standalone=yes? svg width=583 height=360 rect x=10 y=10 width=30 height=30 fill=blue/ /svg I obtain: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.batik.bridge.UnitProcessor.createContext (Lorg/apache/batik/bridge/BridgeContext;Lorg/w3c/dom/Element;) Lorg/apache/batik/util/UnitProcessor$Context; at org.apache.fop.image.analyser.SVGReader.loadImage(Unknown Source) at org.apache.fop.image.analyser.SVGReader.verifySignature(Unknown Source) at org.apache.fop.image.analyser.ImageReaderFactory.Make(Unknown Source) at org.apache.fop.image.FopImageFactory.Make(Unknown Source) I include the Batik version 1.1.1. All classes are in the classpath. Is createContext a static Method? Regards, Joachim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16318] - NoSuchMethod - Error when embedding SVG
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16318. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16318 NoSuchMethod - Error when embedding SVG [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-01-22 11:25 --- You must use the Batik jar from the FOP distribution. I think in case of the 0.20.4 it is *not* 1.1.1 but some 1.5 beta release. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16318] - NoSuchMethod - Error when embedding SVG
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16318. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16318 NoSuchMethod - Error when embedding SVG --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-01-22 11:57 --- Thank You! It works with batik from fop distribution. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4569] - FOP 0.20.1 : Error while loading TTF fonts for PDF rendering
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4569. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4569 FOP 0.20.1 : Error while loading TTF fonts for PDF rendering [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-01-09 13:01 --- This is fixed now in the redesign. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14765] New: - Error using IE5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14765. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14765 Error using IE5 Summary: Error using IE5 Product: Fop Version: 0.20.4 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT/2K Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: Other Component: pdf renderer AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] When using FOP and fo file to convert into PDF using Internet Explorer 5 I get a blank page. Any ideas? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11838] - Error when use a user configuartion font file in embedded FOP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11838. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11838 Error when use a user configuartion font file in embedded FOP [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-21 17:04 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 14319 *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6238] - Error when opening pdf in acrobat reader
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6238. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6238 Error when opening pdf in acrobat reader [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-19 18:02 --- Probably broken font file, try another one or send it to me privately and I'll check it out. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6539] - Poor error recovery from invalid FO; wrong exit status
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6539. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6539 Poor error recovery from invalid FO; wrong exit status [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-14 17:55 --- System.exit stuff fixed already and the rest is a dublicate of the bug #5010. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 5010 *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5010] - Better error reporting needed
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5010. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5010 Better error reporting needed [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-14 17:55 --- *** Bug 6539 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4569] - FOP 0.20.1 : Error while loading TTF fonts for PDF rendering
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4569. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4569 FOP 0.20.1 : Error while loading TTF fonts for PDF rendering [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-14 22:37 --- I'm not sure what class are you talking about, but at least 0.20.5cvs version of org.apache.fop.fonts.FontFileReader reads file using 2048 bytes buffer. I'll close the bug, but if you are still experiencing the problem, feel free to reopen it and provide more detailed explanation. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4569] - FOP 0.20.1 : Error while loading TTF fonts for PDF rendering
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4569. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4569 FOP 0.20.1 : Error while loading TTF fonts for PDF rendering [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-15 07:46 --- Right. I've changed the loader code during some refactoring work because it was very unclear and too complicated. I still need to fix this in the redesign, though. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10031] - FOP error handling: return codes not set
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10031. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10031 FOP error handling: return codes not set [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-13 19:36 --- Fixed in 0.20.4. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9235] - FOP Servlet Error
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9235. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9235 FOP Servlet Error [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-13 19:43 --- Not enough information to identify the problem. Save generated pdf to a disk before sending it to a browser and check if it's ok. Excuse me, but I'll resovle the bug as invalid, but feel free to reopen it if you think that's really FOP bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: External Image error
Venkata Rao Nadella wrote: Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.init(Unknown Source) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.init(Unknown Source) H, looks too bizarre, NoClassDefFoundError in the constructor of sun.net.www.http.HttpClient. Are you sure your java installation is ok? What is your java environment? fo:external-graphic src=http://www.cafeconleche.org/cup.gif/ That works fine for me. -- Oleg Tkachenko eXperanto team Multiconn Technologies, Israel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]