Peter B. West wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 01.02.2003 00:16:30 Peter B. West wrote:
Should we reserve a directory on the web site for storing diagrams
which find their way into the Wiki?
+0. The other possibility is to put it in the public_html folder of your
cvs.apache.org account.
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hi all (and especially Peter)
I'd like to ask if and when we can integrate Peter's work into the main
redesign. If nobody is against this move in general, I'd volunteer to
help Peter integrate it. I've got some time for this and I think this
could help focus our limited
Hi all (and especially Peter)
I'd like to ask if and when we can integrate Peter's work into the main
redesign. If nobody is against this move in general, I'd volunteer to
help Peter integrate it. I've got some time for this and I think this
could help focus our limited resources.
Peter, would
Jeremias,
I shall do that, although, never having had anything to do with Wikis
before, I will be fumbling.
As you may have noticed, I have been somewhat distracted since the New
Year. Among the things that require attention are my attempts at a
pseudo-code-walkthrough style of documentation
On 23.01.2003 12:34:33 Peter B. West wrote:
Jeremias,
I shall do that, although, never having had anything to do with Wikis
before, I will be fumbling.
It's easy. You'll see. :-)
As you may have noticed, I have been somewhat distracted since the New
Year. Among the things that require
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 23.01.2003 12:34:33 Peter B. West wrote:
...
There are a couple of issues in the design of the properties code that
will require decisions from the editors. I will detail these on the
Wiki, and formulate questions for the editors in hopes of a quick reply.
I
Peter B. West wrote:
. . .
What will be interesting here is the possibility
of defining a set of structure events for integration with the structure
renderers like RTF, and I hope we can have some fruitful discussions
with Bertrand on this.
Looks promising, let me know where to look when the
Title: Integration of Peter's work
If
clear documentation of what needs to be done can be produced, I'm willing to
offer my time to it, too, though I don't know if my not having R/W access to the
CVS would make me an unsuitable candidate.
-Original Message-From: Jeremias Maerki
Processing properly generated unified diffs is not much of a problem. It
would be cool if you could help, too. We can use all the help we can get.
Just curious: Is the missing R/W access to CVS a reason for you not to
contribute?
(another little thing: Are you forced to use that particular mail
Rhett Aultman wrote:
As for my mail client...pretty much, yes, I am. It's a standard
at my company. The only other option is for me to switch to my
private email account and start using a web-based client. If
it's annoying people, I can.
If you're using Outlook, there is a checkbox on the
]
Subject: Re: mail clients (was: Integration of Peter's work)
It's not only about the HTML. It's also about the In-Reply-To and/or
References
header entry. Some mail clients have a thread view (as a tree) and not
having these header entries involves attaching mails manually to the
thread
I can't remember any. Do you know about gmane (http://www.gmane.org)?
You could try to have the FOP lists registrated there. Other Apache
projects have done the same.
On 23.01.2003 16:42:09 Patrick Dean Rusk wrote:
For my part, I've never understood why people seem to prefer mailing lists
to
On 23.01.2003 16:07:24 Rhett Aultman wrote:
Doing anything is why I have volunteered to help integrate Peter's
work. It seems like the sort of thing I could do without excessive
domain knowledge and like something I can do while I keep an eye on the
layout system and while thinking about my
...and I don't use the built-in Ant support. Doesn't work on my machine.
Lots of error with out build.xml.
On 23.01.2003 18:32:01 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
BTW, does anyone here use Eclipse as their IDE? I use it, and getting
it to play nice with FOP's source hasn't been easy for me, so I
of Peter's work
On 23.01.2003 16:07:24 Rhett Aultman wrote:
Doing anything is why I have volunteered to help integrate Peter's
work. It seems like the sort of thing I could do without excessive
domain knowledge and like something I can do while I keep an eye on the
layout system and while
Patrick Dean Rusk wrote:
For my part, I've never understood why people seem to prefer mailing lists
to NTTP newsgroups. Has there ever been a discussion about moving to a
newsgroup?
Probably security stuff, old practice and archiving. But anyway, what's wrong
with mail list? Please, no more
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
It's not only about the HTML. It's also about the In-Reply-To
and/or References
header entry. Some mail clients have a thread view (as a tree) and not
having these header entries involves attaching mails manually to the
thread.
Hmmm. I use Outlook it does this for
I use Mozilla 1.2.1 and your msgs come through fine for me.
:-)
Victor Mote wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
It's not only about the HTML. It's also about the In-Reply-To
and/or References
header entry. Some mail clients have a thread view (as a tree) and not
having these header entries
Yours are ok. You can check yourself for the In-Reply-To header.
On 23.01.2003 19:17:48 Victor Mote wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
It's not only about the HTML. It's also about the In-Reply-To
and/or References
header entry. Some mail clients have a thread view (as a tree) and not
-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Integration of Peter's work
Thread-Index: AcLC5w8EfopAYM1NRWmF6Xg3Xcc/PQAAvEbg
From Jeremias Mail
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.05.06
Peter's mail headers
User-Agent: Mozilla
20 matches
Mail list logo
