I second that so
+2
for fop-user list.
Michiel
$ -----Original Message-----
$ From: Keiron Liddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
$ Sent: maandag 25 juni 2001 10:28
$ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$ Subject: Mailing Lists (was: Out of Memory Error)
$
$
$ Speaking of sending things to mailing lists.
$
$ I think we should make the move of getting a fop-user mailing list and
$ keeping the fop-dev list of development (and someone else
$ suggested it to
$ me too).
$
$ So here's my vote:
$
$ +1
$ for fop-user list.
$
$ Keiron.
$
$ On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:04:17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ > I agree, when big patches are involved, for some reasonable
$ definition of
$ > "big".
$ >
$ > I think Alex McLintock's suggestion is best - we have 2
$ lists, one for
$ > users and
$ > the existing one for developers only. Smaller patches, I
$ think, should
$ > still go
$ > to the fop-dev list; my reasoning here is that committers are not
$ > necessarily in
$ > a position to commit instantly or even in a couple of days.
$ If it's on a
$ > list
$ > then at least individual developers can apply it themselves
$ right away if
$ > they
$ > wish. We also have better history, archiving support, visibility and
$ > non-repudiation if it goes to a list vice going to a number
$ of personal
$ > email
$ > addresses.
$
$
$ ---------------------------------------------------------------------
$ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$ For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
