Glen Mazza wrote:
> Ideally, that would be mostly it. My current
> design-thinking is that once flow of control leaves
> the apps package, it does not return until has a full
> document finished.
I think we are on the same page here, or at least I see no conflict. I don't
think of the control cl
--- Victor Mote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmmm. I'm not sure how to interpret the silence. I'm
> going to press on with
> my proposals unless I get some sort of substantive
> reply.
>
> Victor Mote
>
Victor,
I apologize for the silence--I did read your email on
Sunday and more thoroughly
Victor Mote wrote:
> Because we are such a small group, I am hoping to get unanimity on all of
> the points. If I have addressed your concerns with the above
> clarifications,
> please consider changing the -1 votes to a zero (or better). If
> anybody has
> serious reservations, I need to think ab
Glen Mazza wrote:
> --- Victor Mote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1. In other words, I would
> > like to have permission to temporarily treat Driver
> > as either a singleton or
> > a location for static constructs, which can be used
> > to control the
> > interaction between the various modules,
