Re: A C XSL-FO processor

2001-09-12 Thread Arved Sandstrom
At 04:32 PM 9/12/01 +1000, Peter West wrote: I concur with much of what you have said here, and I am much more comfortable in C than in Java. C++ I have always avoided. That said, I would personally prefer to pursue the Java development for career reasons - I have much more chance of getting

Re: A C XSL-FO processor

2001-09-12 Thread Mick Farmer
Dear Arved others, I'm willing to volunteer to help with the C implementation. I would also like to see a data structures + algorithms approach to the project. At least it will provide some interesting comparisons! Regards, Mick /\ \ /

Re: A C XSL-FO processor

2001-09-11 Thread Frank Chen
Hello: When I see XSL-FO, I know the time of personal publishers is coming. It is a very important technology I've ever seen around XML,... This project sounds very attractive. I am very interested in Python bindings, and I would like to giving it a try. Frank - Original Message -

Re: A C XSL-FO processor

2001-09-11 Thread Arved Sandstrom
Hi, Frank Carlos reminded me that there are no project mailing lists yet, so I set one up. It should be active sometime today. I'll announce it when it's up, so we can transfer discussion over to it. I am not a Python guru, although I've used it off and on. I _have_ done some straight C

RE: A C XSL-FO processor

2001-09-10 Thread Jason Bodnar
I'm very interested but I haven't done alot of C programming so I may not be of much help in the beginning. I'd especially be interested in Perl bindings for such a project and could definitely help out in that area as I've done some XS stuff in the past. On 10-Sep-2001 Arved Sandstrom wrote:

RE: A C XSL-FO processor

2001-09-10 Thread Darren Munt
This is for all those developers out there that like the technology (XSL) but aren't turning cartwheels over Java. That includes me. And me. Now you're speaking my language. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For