RE: FOP schema

2002-12-10 Thread Chuck Paussa
Victor Mote and Peter West wrote: I noticed from your commt that the 'country-name's had lost their spaces, e.g., MACEDONIA,THEFORMERYUGOSLAVREPUBLICOF. . . . However, the 3-letter language codes are the ones we need. I took the text for that section from one of the ISO standards. I wasn't

RE: FOP schema

2002-12-05 Thread Victor Mote
Peter B. West wrote: Victor Mote wrote: While working on an FAQ for FO dtd schema, I see that we have two schema in docs/foschema: fop4f.xsd fop4.xsd. They are similar. Does anyone know what the purpose for both is, why we have 2, or the 4 4f designations? Victor, I think that

Re: FOP schema

2002-12-05 Thread Peter B. West
Victor Mote wrote: If no one objects, I would like to move this information to fop.xsd let CVS handle the revision issues. The viewcvs program allows us to append a revision number, so we could even branch tag this to keep it tied to releases. Sounds OK. Peter -- Peter B. West [EMAIL

Re: FOP schema

2002-12-04 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Victor Mote wrote: While working on an FAQ for FO dtd schema, I see that we have two schema in docs/foschema: fop4f.xsd fop4.xsd. They are similar. Does anyone know what the purpose for both is, why we have 2, or the 4 4f designations? I think fop4f.xsd is the latest one. Anyway Chuck Paussa

Re: FOP schema

2002-12-04 Thread Peter B. West
Victor Mote wrote: While working on an FAQ for FO dtd schema, I see that we have two schema in docs/foschema: fop4f.xsd fop4.xsd. They are similar. Does anyone know what the purpose for both is, why we have 2, or the 4 4f designations? Victor, I think that Chuck was appending a letter to