Sorry for the delay.
On 16.07.2004 19:00:25 Victor Mote wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Making these parts into separate components is in line with
what I have in mind when can talk about a shared repository
between Batik and FOP. I hope I can take a good look into
Good. I think it
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I'm simply thinking that adding statics is a lot easier than
removing them again. I usually create non-static classes and
create singletons around them if necessary or convenient.
That's basically it.
One of the main purposes of
FontServer was to share as much
Chris, Jeremias, and anyone else looking at FOray code:
I have created the following branch in FOray's CVS that you will want to use
for your evaluation:
rel_0_1_branch
I have started some other changes in the root that should probably be
evaluated separately.
I apologize for the
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Making these parts into separate components is in line with
what I have in mind when can talk about a shared repository
between Batik and FOP. I hope I can take a good look into
Good. I think it has potential to be useful to many applications.
what you did later.
Making these parts into separate components is in line with what I have
in mind when can talk about a shared repository between Batik and FOP. I
hope I can take a good look into what you did later. From a quick look,
however, I wasn't very pleased that you propose to use a lot of statics
in the
Victor Mote wrote:
FOP Devs:
I am pleased to announce the release of FOray 0.1 alpha 1. This release is
only useful to FOP developers. Some useful information about the release can
be found in these places:
http://foray.sourceforge.net/module/font/index.html
