Re: Fix for fo:leader

2003-02-03 Thread J.Pietschmann
Peter B. West wrote: public final static int JUSTIFY = 54; This indicates a missing break in the JUSTIFY case... bingo, right! I'm humilated. :-/ J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: Fix for fo:leader

2003-02-03 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
J.Pietschmann wrote: May be creating -outfo param for fop.bat/sh is better? Certainly, but this is real work. Even better would be fop -xml foo.xml -xsl foo.xsl -fo foo.fo but this requires even more work (because the FO file is no longer automatically an input)/ Yeah, lets leave that

Re: Fix for fo:leader

2003-02-03 Thread J.Pietschmann
Oleg Tkachenko wrote: Yeah, lets leave that command line stuff alone. btw, what about moving it to CLI in the trunk? I've been thinking about it, it seems to me CLI doesn't support such optional options like our -fo, but the rest looks okay. Certainly an idea. However, I'd like to have the

Re: Fix for fo:leader

2003-02-03 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
J.Pietschmann wrote: Yeah, lets leave that command line stuff alone. btw, what about moving it to CLI in the trunk? I've been thinking about it, it seems to me CLI doesn't support such optional options like our -fo, but the rest looks okay. Certainly an idea. However, I'd like to have the

Re: Fix for fo:leader

2003-02-01 Thread Christian Geisert
J.Pietschmann wrote: Hi, I more or less fixed the leader generation causing all sorts of problems and specifically #15936. Some issues: - The state machine detecting line breaks is brittle. It will probably cause problems if leaders are mixed with graphics on the same line I'm again tempted

RE: Fix for fo:leader

2003-01-29 Thread Victor Mote
J.Pietschmann wrote: 3. Distribute any slack space left equally on the resizable spaces (subject to round off, should use a Bresenham-like algo for perfection :-) Can anybody come up with an algorithm to distribute slack space over several leaders which can deal with