Re: Ready for 0.20.5 from my side

2003-01-20 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Can't we do it in a way that the history gets copied? That way, people
downloading an old revision will have both src/org and src/java/org
locally, so it uses a bit more storage capacity but still build. Is that
doable?

On 15.01.2003 19:41:51 Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
 
  I'll continue to do the directory moves in the redesign and I'm still
  hoping for a volunteer to do the server side move/copy of the src/org
  directory to src/java/org.
 It's easy, but we'll loose ability to build old revisions then (didn't we 
 yet?). If it's not an issue, all we have to do is to move the directory within 
   the repository and massage CVSROOT/history, that's it, isn't it? Well, I'm 
 going to try on local cvs first with xml-fop module.


Jeremias Maerki


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Ready for 0.20.5 from my side

2003-01-20 Thread Peter B. West
Jeremias Maerki wrote:

Can't we do it in a way that the history gets copied? That way, people
downloading an old revision will have both src/org and src/java/org
locally, so it uses a bit more storage capacity but still build. Is that
doable?

On 15.01.2003 19:41:51 Oleg Tkachenko wrote:


Jeremias Maerki wrote:



I'll continue to do the directory moves in the redesign and I'm still
hoping for a volunteer to do the server side move/copy of the src/org
directory to src/java/org.


It's easy, but we'll loose ability to build old revisions then (didn't we 
yet?). If it's not an issue, all we have to do is to move the directory within 
 the repository and massage CVSROOT/history, that's it, isn't it? Well, I'm 
going to try on local cvs first with xml-fop module.

I already have three trees - HEAD, maint and alt.  The main thing is 
that particular distributions be reproduced.  Make sure the complete 
tree is tagged just before the move.  Then, when things are moved, you 
take the trouble to add a Moved from ... tag TAG comment to the cvs 
add phase, the trail can always be followed back from the cvs log.  I 
don't know whether the same can be said of cvs remove.  I've never tried it.

Peter

--
Peter B. West  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/
Lord, to whom shall we go?


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Ready for 0.20.5 from my side

2003-01-16 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Victor Mote wrote:


Isn't it just copying xml-fop directory back?



I don't understand. Copying it back from where? Do you mean:
1. We should make our own backup copy on the server before doing the
surgery? If so, that makes sense. Space is tight on that x1 filesystem, but
it looks like that directory is only about 97 MB  its probably very
compressible.

Yes, that's what I've meant.

--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn Technologies, Israel


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Ready for 0.20.5 from my side

2003-01-16 Thread Christian Geisert
Oleg Tkachenko wrote:

Jeremias Maerki wrote:


I'll continue to do the directory moves in the redesign and I'm still
hoping for a volunteer to do the server side move/copy of the src/org
directory to src/java/org.


It's easy, but we'll loose ability to build old revisions then (didn't 
we yet?). If it's not an issue, all we have to do is to move the 

I think it's an issue and therefore I'm favouring local moving
(which will lose history and revision numbers, see
http://www.loria.fr/~molli/cvs/doc/cvs_7.html#SEC64 )

But is it worth the effort?

Christian


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Ready for 0.20.5 from my side

2003-01-15 Thread Arnd Beißner
If you could give me little more time...

I just checked out the current CVS maintenance branch and planned
to post a diff this evening containing my PS renderer fixes/optimizations 
regarding
current position handling...

Do you want to wait?
--
Cappelino Informationstechnologie GmbH
Arnd Beißner

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Ready for 0.20.5 from my side

2003-01-15 Thread Victor Mote
Jeremias Maerki wrote:

 I'll continue to do the directory moves in the redesign and I'm still
 hoping for a volunteer to do the server side move/copy of the src/org
 directory to src/java/org.

I'll be glad to help with the server side move/copy. AFAIK, a simple Unix
mv/cp should do the trick on the server side. My preference is to use cp 
then move the old stuff to the attic after the dust settles (that will cost
us only about 21 MB of disk space). The real issue is that /everyone's/
sandbox is messed up by this, so it is worthwhile to coordinate this so that
everyone can get changes checked in (or moved aside), blow away their
sandbox,  get a clean sandbox after the surgery. Also, it would be good to
know that we could get our repository restored if something went wrong -- do
we know how to do that?

Victor Mote


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Ready for 0.20.5 from my side

2003-01-15 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Victor Mote wrote:


us only about 21 MB of disk space). The real issue is that /everyone's/
sandbox is messed up by this, so it is worthwhile to coordinate this so that
everyone can get changes checked in (or moved aside), blow away their
sandbox,  get a clean sandbox after the surgery.

+1 probably prior we have to make sure that everybody agrees with it.

 Also, it would be good to

know that we could get our repository restored if something went wrong -- do
we know how to do that?

Isn't it just copying xml-fop directory back?

--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn Technologies, Israel


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Ready for 0.20.5 from my side

2003-01-15 Thread Victor Mote
Oleg Tkachenko wrote:

 It's easy, but we'll loose ability to build old revisions then (didn't we
 yet?). If it's not an issue, all we have to do is to move the
 directory within
   the repository and massage CVSROOT/history, that's it, isn't
 it? Well, I'm
 going to try on local cvs first with xml-fop module.

If something needs to be done to CVSROOT/history, then you are way ahead of
me.

Victor Mote


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Ready for 0.20.5 from my side

2003-01-15 Thread Victor Mote
Oleg Tkachenko wrote:

   Also, it would be good to
  know that we could get our repository restored if something
 went wrong -- do
  we know how to do that?
 Isn't it just copying xml-fop directory back?

I don't understand. Copying it back from where? Do you mean:
1. We should make our own backup copy on the server before doing the
surgery? If so, that makes sense. Space is tight on that x1 filesystem, but
it looks like that directory is only about 97 MB  its probably very
compressible.
2. Copying back from a sandbox? All history would be lost.

Victor Mote


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Ready for 0.20.5 from my side

2003-01-15 Thread Peter B. West
Victor Mote wrote:

Jeremias Maerki wrote:



I'll continue to do the directory moves in the redesign and I'm still
hoping for a volunteer to do the server side move/copy of the src/org
directory to src/java/org.



I'll be glad to help with the server side move/copy. AFAIK, a simple Unix
mv/cp should do the trick on the server side. My preference is to use cp 
then move the old stuff to the attic after the dust settles (that will cost
us only about 21 MB of disk space). The real issue is that /everyone's/
sandbox is messed up by this, so it is worthwhile to coordinate this so that
everyone can get changes checked in (or moved aside), blow away their
sandbox,  get a clean sandbox after the surgery. Also, it would be good to
know that we could get our repository restored if something went wrong -- do
we know how to do that?


Victor, Oleg,

My distinct preference would be to do this in the boring, staid old 
fuddy-duddy way (that's the kind of guy I am.)   Go through the motions 
of local move, cvs remove, cvs add and cvs ci.  This is the way with the 
least complications.

If the issue is 100Mb of disc space, then the system desperately needs 
another 50Gb or so of disc.  We can all donate $5 and give it to the ASF.

Peter
--
Peter B. West  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/
Lord, to whom shall we go?


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]