Thanks, Greg and Nicola, for your answers. I've already sent the form to
the person I mentioned. Now that most of my questions have been resolved
I'm off to "distribute" quite a bunch of these forms to all the various
copyright holders.
After it has been suggested that every single file submitted
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> And then there's the files from the original TeX distribution by Donald
> Knuth which are assumed to be in the public domain but with certain
> restrictions (modified file shall not contain the same filename as the
> original). Problem there is that there is not really som
I've just received that email. The original author is willing to fax in
a grant. Question now: Where can I find the form? I've only found the
one for committers. Thanks a lot!
On 17.03.2003 15:23:55 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> I've received an email a few minutes ago from a FOP contributor telling
>
There's another IMO: Clause 7 expects a restriction that the ASL can't
provide.
On 17.03.2003 14:32:16 Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> See below the Latex License.
>
> http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.html
>
> It seems to me that clause '8.B" makes this license more restrictive than
> the
Thanks, Steven and Dirk for responding!
On 17.03.2003 14:28:44 Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
>
> > > Before we start here's a little background on the hyphenation stuff:
> > > Our hyphenation file are XML files that are derived from TeX hyphenation
>
> Under what license where the original TeX fi
Folks,
See below the Latex License.
http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.html
It seems to me that clause '8.B" makes this license more restrictive than
the ASF license - and we thus should not allow code(fragements) which are
under this license in downloads from ASF infrastructure.
Or am
> > Before we start here's a little background on the hyphenation stuff:
> > Our hyphenation file are XML files that are derived from TeX hyphenation
Under what license where the original TeX files ?
> > 2. If the former (of [1]) is true, we need a grant from the copyright
> > holder of the orig
I haven't received any reactions to my post. We still have our pending
release on hold until the issues are resolved. I wonder if I have taken
the wrong approach. Can anybody advise? Thanks!
On 06.03.2003 11:10:28 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Hello all (licensing specialists, XML PMC people, fop-devs)
