]
Subject: Re: mail clients (was: Integration of Peter's work)
It's not only about the HTML. It's also about the In-Reply-To and/or
References
header entry. Some mail clients have a thread view (as a tree) and not
having these header entries involves attaching mails manually to the
thread
I can't remember any. Do you know about gmane (http://www.gmane.org)?
You could try to have the FOP lists registrated there. Other Apache
projects have done the same.
On 23.01.2003 16:42:09 Patrick Dean Rusk wrote:
For my part, I've never understood why people seem to prefer mailing lists
to
Patrick Dean Rusk wrote:
For my part, I've never understood why people seem to prefer mailing lists
to NTTP newsgroups. Has there ever been a discussion about moving to a
newsgroup?
Probably security stuff, old practice and archiving. But anyway, what's wrong
with mail list? Please, no more
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
It's not only about the HTML. It's also about the In-Reply-To
and/or References
header entry. Some mail clients have a thread view (as a tree) and not
having these header entries involves attaching mails manually to the
thread.
Hmmm. I use Outlook it does this for
I use Mozilla 1.2.1 and your msgs come through fine for me.
:-)
Victor Mote wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
It's not only about the HTML. It's also about the In-Reply-To
and/or References
header entry. Some mail clients have a thread view (as a tree) and not
having these header entries
Yours are ok. You can check yourself for the In-Reply-To header.
On 23.01.2003 19:17:48 Victor Mote wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
It's not only about the HTML. It's also about the In-Reply-To
and/or References
header entry. Some mail clients have a thread view (as a tree) and not
Victor Mote wrote:
It's not only about the HTML. It's also about the In-Reply-To
and/or References
header entry. Some mail clients have a thread view (as a tree) and not
having these header entries involves attaching mails manually to the
thread.
Hmmm. I use Outlook it does this for me. Are