Re: [Patch 101 lesson] RTF patch problem fixed

2003-11-24 Thread Clay Leeds
Does it make sense for xml-fop dev'ers to standardize on a particular directory structure for CVS? It seems that this problem might have been averted had Glen used what I was the standard directory structure for xml-fop development: for development purposes it is best if xml-fop builds be built

Re: [Patch 101 lesson] RTF patch problem fixed

2003-11-23 Thread Christian Geisert
Glen Mazza wrote: [..] 2.) My problem with yesterday's file is that the Index was Index: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/render/rtf/rtflib/testdocs/SimpleLists.java, but I don't store FOP in an parent directory named xml-fop. I manually edited all the indices in the patch file to just start