Clay, you need to consider that this guy may not see your answer if he isn't subscribed to fop-dev. You need post answers in bugzilla which will automatically send a natification to the reporter.
BTW, it's funny. I also wondered if the xsl:include shouldn't be top-level. But after I made his text.xsl well-formed (!) the FO got generated just fine on my machine. Strange. On 03.06.2003 18:02:11 Clay Leeds wrote: <snip/> > Actually, I believe (respectfully) that the bug is in your XSL. First of > all, the xsl:include tag is not closed (although that may be just a > typo). 2ndly, according to everywhere I've read, (XML Bible, the XSL > spec, etc.): > > The xsl:include element is only allowed as a top-level element. <snip/> Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
