Peter B. West wrote:
> > 1. improved property handling
> > 2. pull-parsing instead of an FO Tree (but with some data
> stored in memory)
> > 3. a different layout approach
...
> > Re #2: this is the one that I don't yet understand. Peter and I
> had a thread
> > about six months ago that tried t
John Austin wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 15:22, Victor Mote wrote:
John Austin wrote:
to work on this but I don't want to walk in to a firefight.
FWIW, I don't think there is really a firefight. Our discussions are usually
at least robust, maybe even rowdy, but AFAICT, there is a large amount of
Victor Mote wrote:
John Austin wrote:
I offered (off-line) to look merging the Alt-Design code
in to the main branch but I suspect that there are some
different directions associated with this. Perhaps this
is the reason it has not been done so far. I am still willing
to work on this but I don't w
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 15:22, Victor Mote wrote:
> John Austin wrote:
> > to work on this but I don't want to walk in to a firefight.
>
> FWIW, I don't think there is really a firefight. Our discussions are usually
> at least robust, maybe even rowdy, but AFAICT, there is a large amount of
> mutua
John Austin wrote:
> I just spent a while trying to understand PropertyList
> and PropertyListBuilder and found out that I need to
> understand Property and Property.Maker as well. I think
> I am going to have to help with this part of the project
> but it is going to take a while.
Yes, this stuf
