RE: FOP developer's style guide? (Was: interface instead of implementation)

2002-11-06 Thread Rhett Aultman
You get my +1. A Wiki for a draft, followed by a vote for commitment to a less malleable form, is the best way I could see for us to do this. -Original Message- From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacretaz;codeconsult.ch] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 10:48 AM To: [EMAIL

Re: FOP developer's style guide? (Was: interface instead of implementation)

2002-11-06 Thread Jeremias Maerki
+1 On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 16:48:11 +0100 Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Wednesday 06 November 2002 16:31, Rhett Aultman wrote: . . . Maybe we should seriously consider a FOP developer coding standard and start writing it down and putting it on the site. I'd offer to help with that. . . .

RE: FOP developer's style guide? (Was: interface instead of implementation)

2002-11-06 Thread Sauyet, Scott (OTS-HAR)
How about using a wiki page [ ... ] +1 -- Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: FOP developer's style guide? (Was: interface instead of implementation)

2002-11-06 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Wow, that's a quick vote... I have setup the page at http://codeconsult.ch/wiki/index.php/FopDevelopersStyleGuide with a most basic style guide skeleton. I have to run now, but feel free to work on it. Make sure you keep copies of what you write, I cannot guarantee backups on this server yet.