On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 10:04, Victor Mote wrote: > Joerg, Keiron, et al: > > I want to add my congratulations for the good work on the new web site. It > not only looks good, but loads noticeably faster on my connection. I also > see (and like) the "dev" tab. > > As I understand it, the web site will eventually be updated daily > automatically. This raises the question in my mind of how we (or any other > project for that matter) will handle the differences between released > versions and versions under development. Right now, for example, we have > some doc that is basically for 0.20.4, and that we would want most users to > find. However, we also have docs that are being updated frequently that are > related to 1.0 (or the trunk or HEAD, if you will), which developers will > want to find, and which those using cvs will want to find. I think it is > useful to have both of these on our web site, perhaps on different tabs > (??).
Some of these issues have been raised with forrest, but not answered as far as I know. The "dev" tab is actually meant to be the user etc. docs for 1.0dev, maybe a better name could be used. > Also, I have an html document that pulls together our "Implemented" and > "Limitations" pages into one table with a column for each of the > implementation compliance levels, color-coded to show what is complete and > what is not. I did not see a DTD on the Forrest web site that fits this type > of information. However, it looks like we can tell it not to validate > certain documents. I'll be glad to convert it to XML with a stylesheet for > HTML, or submit it as HTML. I'll also be glad to build and submit a DTD to > Forrest, as this might be useful for other projects as well. I'm just not > sure what is easier for you guys to deal with right now. What do you prefer? With a stylesheet would probably be better. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
