Victor Mote wrote:
Peter B. West wrote:
(I wouldn't say it was heated.) I am curious about the impact of
someone working without any formal IDE, and just using (X)Emacs and JDEE
for development. As far as I know, XEmacs does not support Unicode, but
if the non-ASCII characters were restricted
Victor Mote wrote:
I never bit the emacs bullet, and don't directly know the impact there.
GNU emacs 21 knows about UTF-8. Unfortunately, the NT port seems to
be less rock solid than usual, I got the first emacs crashes since
I abandoned Solaris 2.1 in, well, lets say an epoch or two ago.
BTW, I
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Victor Mote wrote:
BTW, I notice the absence of you and Peter from
http://cvs.apache.org/~sgala/nightmap.html
Ok, so how do we drive this thing? Is it zoomable? I couldn't find
pietsch on there either.
Peter
--
Peter B. West http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html
J.Pietschmann wrote:
BTW, I notice the absence of you and Peter from
http://cvs.apache.org/~sgala/nightmap.html
OK, I should be on there the next time the map is regenerated. Now that you
guys know how to get here, come on over!
Victor Mote
Peter B. West wrote:
Ok, so how do we drive this thing? Is it zoomable? I couldn't find
pietsch on there either.
Sorry, I meant to show the path (it took a while to figure out):
Joerg gave us:
http://cvs.apache.org/~sgala/nightmap.html
Then (hoping to find something instructive) look at:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Sure - it is by accident that comments in the jfor source code contains
non-ASCII chars (in people's names IIRC).
OOps, I didn't think about that. We could
a) Force ISO-8859-1 for all Java source files in the build file.
Is this a discrimination of, ummm, non-western
Le Vendredi, 4 juil 2003, à 21:12 Europe/Zurich, J.Pietschmann a écrit :
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Sure - it is by accident that comments in the jfor source code
contains non-ASCII chars (in people's names IIRC).
OOps, I didn't think about that. We could
What I meant is that I think (or
J.Pietschmann wrote:
OOps, I didn't think about that. We could
a) Force ISO-8859-1 for all Java source files in the build file.
Is this a discrimination of, ummm, non-western contributors
who might want to have their names in their native script
in the files?
b) Keep a list of
Victor Mote wrote:
J.Pietschmann wrote:
OOps, I didn't think about that. We could
a) Force ISO-8859-1 for all Java source files in the build file.
Is this a discrimination of, ummm, non-western contributors
who might want to have their names in their native script
in the files?
b) Keep
Christian Geisert wrote:
Java source is whatever the platform encoding is (see file.encoding
system property) so the best thing is to avoid chars 127 at all
(use \u instead) ... uh this won't work in this case as
these are comments. Maybe there's a workaround for special french
characters
Christian Geisert wrote:
Java source is Unicode, and I don't think the encoding would matter, but
Java source is whatever the platform encoding is (see file.encoding
system property) so the best thing is to avoid chars 127 at all
(use \u instead) ... uh this won't work in this case as
Le Jeudi, 3 juil 2003, à 21:16 Europe/Zurich, J.Pietschmann a écrit :
...And, uh, comment language is *english*, guys :-)
Sure - it is by accident that comments in the jfor source code contains
non-ASCII chars (in people's names IIRC).
No problem in removing the accents!
-Bertrand
12 matches
Mail list logo
