On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 03:50:44PM -0700, Glen Mazza wrote:
I agree; however we are none the worse off for Simon's
SAXParser example, and we even got a more powerful
DefaultHandler object in our API as a bonus.
Glen
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I simply think that the
On 20.07.2004 00:50:44 Glen Mazza wrote:
I agree; however we are none the worse off for Simon's
SAXParser example,
I didn't want to imply such a thing, just stating my opinion. I'm sorry.
and we even got a more powerful
DefaultHandler object in our API as a bonus.
Glen
--- Jeremias
I don't think there's a considerable difference. The identity
transformer in Xalan-J is essentially a SAXParser and a 1:1
piping-through of SAX events. It's just a bit more setup code for the
Transformer variant, I think. The choice about what to use is really
personal preference. I simply think
I agree; however we are none the worse off for Simon's
SAXParser example, and we even got a more powerful
DefaultHandler object in our API as a bonus.
Glen
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I simply think that the
Transformer pattern is very
universal and quite easy to use and
