On Nov 25, 2004, at 2:56 AM, Christian Geisert wrote:
The Web Maestro wrote:
[..]
On a similar note, I am 'contemplating' committing the xml-fop/build/
folder ('built' by apache-forrest-0.6). My reasoning for this is
two-fold: 1. it contains the FOP web site (which I've spent a
significant
The Web Maestro wrote:
[..]
On a similar note, I am 'contemplating' committing the xml-fop/build/
folder ('built' by apache-forrest-0.6). My reasoning for this is
two-fold: 1. it contains the FOP web site (which I've spent a
significant amount of time to re-create).
The generated website should
On Nov 24, 2004, at 5:19 PM, Peter B. West wrote:
Clay,
Let me say, Clay, thank you *very*, *very* much for taking care of the
alt-design tab. Have I drawn your attention to the fact that I am
*very happy* that you have taken care of this?
(I have thanked Clay personally out-of-band for his
Yeah, Glen...
On Nov 23, 2004, at 8:18 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
Clay,
I'm noticing a lot of .zips and .bak backup files in our cvs
directories [1] -- this seems unnecessary and a bit messy for a
version control system, as everyone who cvs checkouts or cvs
updates is now downloading these files.
On Nov 24, 2004, at 11:52 AM, The Web Maestro wrote:
On a similar note, I am 'contemplating' committing the xml-fop/build/
folder ('built' by apache-forrest-0.6). My reasoning for this is
two-fold:
1. it contains the FOP web site (which I've spent a significant amount
of time to re-create).
2.
--- The Web Maestro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 24, 2004, at 11:52 AM, The Web Maestro wrote:
On a similar note, I am 'contemplating' committing
the xml-fop/build/
folder ('built' by apache-forrest-0.6). My
reasoning for this is
two-fold:
1. it contains the FOP web site (which
-Original Message-
From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- The Web Maestro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a similar note, I am 'contemplating' committing
the xml-fop/build/ folder ('built' by apache-forrest-0.6).
My reasoning for this is two-fold:
1. it contains the FOP
On Nov 24, 2004, at 1:39 PM, The Web Maestro wrote:
On Nov 24, 2004, at 1:16 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
snip
Also, the output on minotaur should be viewable via
ViewCVS anyway, correct? (We were doing manual
updates to the website to fix the breadcrumb issue--we
went through ViewCVS to find the
-Original Message-
From: The Web Maestro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, Andreas is correct that the site is built from the source (and I
didn't forget that! ;-)).
Yeah, make them sweat at least as hard as you --that way, your effort will
be even more appreciated :-)
Greetz,
The Web Maestro wrote:
BTW -- thanks *very* much for taking care of the alt-design tab, I
greatly appreciate the effort in simplifying our site.
Glad to be of service. If there are other things which anyone thinks can
improve the site (e.g. consolidating pages, removing
10 matches
Mail list logo
